Ex vivo model for renal fracture in cryoablation.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the formation of fractures due to cryoablative therapy in a controlled model and validate the new model for the study of the complication of fractures during renal cryoablation. METHODS: Endocare PERC-17 (1.7 mm) and Galil 17 ga IceRod (1.47 mm) probes were selected because of similar diameter and reported ice-ball size. The ex vivo model used here was a porcine kidney obtained at the supermarket. The kidneys were subsequently bivalved. The cryoprobes were inserted running just underneath the cut surface, entering the lateral surface of the kidney, and directed toward the medial surface of either the upper or lower pole. In this manner, we avoided the major calyces and involved the most parenchyma. Freeze-thaw-freeze cycles of various durations were performed. The probes were frozen parallel to each other at a distance of 20 mm apart. RESULTS: Evidence of cryoablation-induced fracture included popping sounds noted during thaw and cracks that became visible during the phase of second freeze. Cracks were noted to extend from the probe through the parenchyma. In multiple probe freezes, the intervening zone between the 2 ice-balls had smoother ice and the fractures that appeared there originated at either probe. Fracture formation was only observed with the Endocare probes, with single or parallel freezes. No fractures were noted in the IceRod freezes. CONCLUSION: The bivalved ex vivo kidney is an inexpensive, representative, and demonstrative model for study of fracture during cryoablation.

Are multiple cryoprobes additive or synergistic in renal cryotherapy?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between multiple cryoprobes was investigated to determine whether they work in an additive or synergistic fashion in an in vivo animal model because 1.47 mm (17-gauge) cryoprobes have been introduced to the armamentarium for renal cryotherapy. METHODS: Laparoscopic-guided percutaneous cryoablation was performed in both renal poles of 3 pigs using 3 IceRod cryoprobes. These 12 cryolesions were compared with 12 cryolesions using a single IceRod cryoprobe. Each cycle consisted of two 10-minute freeze cycles separated by a 5-minute thaw. The iceball volume was measured using intraoperative ultrasonography. The kidneys were harvested, and cryolesion surface area was calculated. The lesions were fixed and excised to obtain a volume measurement. Statistical analysis was used to compare the single probe results multiplied by 3 to the multiple probe group for iceball volume, cryolesion surface area, and cryolesion volume. RESULTS: The iceball volume for the first freeze cycle for the single cryoprobe multiplied by 3 was 8.55 cm3 compared with 9.79 cm3 for the multiple cryoprobe group (P=.44) and 10.01 cm3 versus 16.58 cm3 for the second freeze (P=.03). The cryolesion volume for the single cryoprobe multiplied by 3 was 11.29 cm3 versus 14.75 cm3 for the multiple cyroprobe group (P=.06). The gross cryolesion surface area for the single cryoprobe multiplied by 3 was 13.14 cm2 versus 13.89 cm2 for the multiple probe group (P=.52). CONCLUSION: The cryolesion created by 3 simultaneously activated 1.47-mm probes appears to be larger than that of an additive effect. The lesions were significantly larger as measured by ultrasonography and nearly so (P=.06) as measured by the gross cryolesion volume.

In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo isotherms for renal cryotherapy.

PURPOSE: Preoperative planning for renal cryotherapy is based on isotherms established in gel. We replicated gel isotherms and correlated them with ex vivo and in vivo isotherms in a porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PERC-17 CryoProbes (1.7 mm) and IceRods (1.47 mm) underwent trials in gel, ex vivo and in vivo porcine kidneys. Temperatures were recorded at 13 predetermined locations with multipoint thermal sensors. RESULTS: At the cryoprobe temperatures were not significantly different along the probe in any medium for either system (p = 0.0947 to 0.9609). However, away from the probe ex vivo and in vivo trials showed warmer temperatures toward the cryoprobe tip for each system (p = 0.0003 to 0.2141). Mean +/- SE temperature 5 mm distal to the cryoprobe tip in vivo was 19.2C +/- 16.1C for CryoProbes and 27.3C +/- 11.2C for IceRods. Temperatures were consistently colder with CryoProbes than with IceRods in gel (p <0.00005), ex vivo (p <0.00005) and in vivo (p = 0.0014). At almost all sites temperatures were significantly colder in gel and in ex vivo kidney than in in vivo kidney for CryoProbes (p = 0.0107 and 0.0008, respectively) and for IceRods (each p <0.00005). CONCLUSIONS: Gel and ex vivo isotherms do not predict the in vivo pattern of freezing. Thus, they should not be used for preoperative planning. The cryoprobe should be passed 5 mm beyond the tumor border to achieve suitably cold temperatures. Multipoint thermal sensor probes are recommended to record actual temperature during renal cryotherapy.

Impact of pneumoperitoneum on renal cryotherapy.

PURPOSE: Pneumoperitoneum is known to decrease blood flow to the kidney during laparoscopy. We investigated if this change in blood flow would increase the size of the cryolesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve Yorkshire swine underwent laparoscopy-guided percutaneous cryoablation of the upper and lower pole of each kidney at four randomized pneumoperitoneum pressures (10, 15, 20, and 25 mm Hg). Cryolesions were made with a 1.47-mm IceRod (Galil Medical, Plymouth Meeting, PA). Each site underwent two 10-minute freeze cycles separated by a 5-minute active thaw with pressurized helium gas. At the conclusion of each freeze cycle, the iceball volume was measured with intraoperative ultrasound. After completion of the four cryolesions, the kidneys were harvested, and the cryolesion surface area was calculated. The lesions were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and then excised with a 1-mm margin to obtain a volume measurement using fluid displacement. RESULTS: Iceball volume was 3.41, 2.85, 3.44, and 2.36 cm(3) for freeze cycle 1 (p = 0.16) and 3.67, 3.34, 4.88, 3.95 cm(3) for freeze cycle 2 (p = 0.20) at 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm Hg, respectively. Cryolesion volume by fluid displacement was 4.06, 3.77, 3.97, and 3.93 cm(3) (p = 0.86) and cryolesion surface area was 4.55, 4.38, 4.39, and 4.20 cm(2) (p = 0.71) at 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, pneumoperitoneum pressure between 10 and 25 mm Hg did not affect iceball size as measured by intraoperative ultrasound, cryolesion volume by fluid displacement, or cryolesion surface.