Pre-exposure prophylaxis program in the Community of Madrid: Two years of experience.

INTRODUCTION: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is an effective and safe preventive measure. However, it has not reached all target users who could benefit from it. The study aimed to understand the sociodemographic, clinical and behavioral baseline characteristics of PrEP users. As a secondary objective, the use of concomitant medication and drug consumption were described. METHODOLOGY: Observational, retrospective and descriptive study of the sociodemographic, clinical and behavioral characteristics of the users who were included in the PrEP program of the Community of Madrid during the first two years of experience. RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred fifty-six PrEP users were included, 99.0% men, with a mean age of 36.9 years (SD 8.68). 33.1% presented a sexually transmitted infection (STI) on the first visit, highlighting chlamydiasis and rectal gonococci. 70.4% reported using drugs associated with sex, and 42.4% participated in chemsex sessions in the last 3 months. A high percentage of users with concomitant medication was observed (37.6%), highlighting drugs related to mental health and alopecia. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary approach is required to cover all the needs of PrEP users, including mental health evaluation measures and addiction treatment with the clinical approach.

Estudio transversal sobre la percepción de los factores favorecedores de la actividad investigadora en enfermedades infecciosas / Cross-sectional study on the perception of factors favoring research activity in infectious diseases

Introducción: La implicación de los médicos asistenciales en tareas de investigación clínica presenta grandes diferencias entre las diversas instituciones. Material y método: Estudio transversal basado en una encuesta enviada a los miembros del Grupo de Trabajo de Enfermedades Infecciosas (GTei) de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI) durante el mes de mayo de 2022. Resultados: De 1.789 miembros del GTei, 169 miembros (9,45%) cumplimentaron la encuesta. La percepción de la conveniencia de participación de cada facultativo en una o varias líneas de investigación fue de 8 puntos (P25:7; P75: 9 puntos). La percepción sobre el estímulo para investigar del sistema sanitario o de la dirección del hospital fue de 2 puntos (1-4), respectivamente. El apoyo a la investigación fue valorado con de 5 (2-7) y 6 (3-7) puntos en relación con el jefe de servicio y los compañeros del departamento, respectivamente. Otros factores evaluados fueron la falta de tiempo por no poder reducir la actividad asistencial (9; 7-10 puntos), la priorización de las actividades de ocio durante el tiempo libre disponible (7; 5-8 puntos), la organización de la carga asistencial (6; 3-9 puntos), las dificultades en la coordinación con otros servicios clínicos o centrales (6; 5-7 puntos y 6; 5-8 puntos, respectivamente). Conclusiones: La investigación clínica es muy bien valorada por los internistas dedicados a la patología infecciosa. Las principales necesidades percibidas son un mayor apoyo institucional y de la dirección del hospital, una mejor organización del departamento, la coordinación interdepartamental y disponer de más tiempo para esta actividad.(AU)

Background: The involvement of attending physicians in clinical research activities differs greatly among institutions. Method: Cross-sectional study based on a survey submitted to the members of the Working Group on Infectious Diseases (GTei) of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) during the month of May 2022. Results: Out of 1,789 members of the GTei, 169 members (9.45%) completed the survey. The perception of the convenience of participation of each physician in one or more lines of research was 8 points (P25:7; P75: 9 points). The perception of encouragement to do research by the health system or hospital management was 2points (1-4), respectively. Support for research was rated at 5 (2-7) and 6 (3-7) points inrelation to the head of service and colleagues in the department, respectively. Other factors evaluated were the lack of time due to not being able to reduce the care activity (9; 7-10 points), prioritization of leisure activities during available free time (7; 5-8 points), organization of the care load (6; 3-9 points), difficulties in coordinating with other clinical or central services (6; 5-7 points and 6; 5-8 points, respectively). Conclusions: Clinical research is highly valued by internists dedicated to infectious diseases. The main perceived needs are greater institutional and hospital managementsupport, better organization of the department, interdepartmental coordination and more time for this activity. (AU)

Código sepsis: el problema de la identificación / Code sepsis: The detection problem

No disponible