Does maintaining the number of present and functional teeth benefit the longevity of life in older people requiring nursing care?: A prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: This prospective cohort study examined the effects of the number of present and functional teeth on mortality among older Japanese adults requiring nursing care in an environment of comprehensive oral hygiene and nutritional management. METHODS: The study included 174 older adults (mean age: 84.4 ± 8.3 years; male/female: 49/125) in need of support or long-term care, who resided in either a local specialized healthcare facility or their own homes, and received daily oral hygiene and nutritional support at facilities in Okayama, Japan. The initial clinical oral examination along with assessment of general physical condition and nursing environment of the participants were performed in July 2013 and followed up for one year. RESULTS: All-cause mortality occurred in 28 (mean age: 88.7 ±13.4 years; male/female: 6 /22) individuals during the follow-up period. Cox proportional hazard analysis indicated that older age, low performance in activities of daily living (Barthel Index <40), and underweight status (body mass index <18.5) were significant risk factors for mortality. The number of present and functional teeth were not found to be significant risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: During the one-year follow-up period, the number of present and functional teeth did not have a significant impact on mortality among older Japanese adults requiring nursing care in a well-managed environment of oral hygiene and nutritional status.

Risk factors for root caries annual incidence and progression among older people requiring nursing care: A one-year prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine root caries annual incidence (RCAI) and root caries annual progression (RCAP) and risk factors for them among older people requiring nursing care. METHODS: The target population comprised 186 dentate individuals aged ≥ 65 years who required nursing care while living in nursing homes (NHs) or their own homes (OHs) in Okayama, Japan. Survey items included presence/absence and severity of root caries, age, sex, living environment (NH or OH), the Clinical Dementia Rating, and the Barthel Index (BI). Baseline surveys were conducted from 2015 to 2017; subjects were followed up for one year. RCAI and RCAP per tooth and per person were calculated, and risk factors for them were identified using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: In total, 104 individuals (mean age: 82.0 ± 12.4 years) completed the follow-up survey. RCAIs per tooth and per person were 14.6% (173/1188) and 59.6% (62/104), respectively. RCAP per tooth was 22.5% (51/227 teeth with root caries at baseline). Significant risk factors for RCAI were living environment (OH, odds ratio [OR]: 2.14), sex (male, OR: 1.84), clasped tooth (OR: 1.82), and older age (OR: 1.05) at baseline. Significant risk factors for RCAP were sex (male, OR: 5.20), regular dental checkup (OR: 2.74), and high BI score (OR: 1.02) at baseline. CONCLUSION: At one-year follow-up, 59.6% of the subjects developed at least one root caries. Risk factors for RCAI were living environment (OH), male, clasped tooth, and older age, whereas those for RCAP were male, regular dental checkup, and high BI score.

Six-year follow-up assessment of prosthesis survival and oral health-related quality of life in individuals with partial edentulism treated with three types of prosthodontic rehabilitation.

Purpose The purpose of the study was to compare the long-term performance of three prostheses for partial edentulism: implant-supported, fixed denture (IFD), fixed partial denture (FPD), and removable partial denture (RPD), in terms of prosthesis survival and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).Methods The 138 patients in our previous study (Kimura et al., 2012) received one of the three prosthetic treatments and answered a validated OHRQoL questionnaire before and immediately after treatment. In the present study, the patients were followed up six years after treatment using medical records and OHRQoL examinations to evaluate prosthesis survival and change in OHRQoL. The cumulative survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Steel-Dwass test was used to compare the median OHRQoL scores at the three time points.Results For the 105 patients (66.8 ± 10.8 years, IFD/FPD/RPD: 58/27/20 patients) who successfully completed the follow-up assessments, the six-year estimated cumulative survival rates of the IFDs, FPDs, and RPDs were 94.7%, 77.4%, and 33.3%, respectively. The log-rank tests indicated that the survival curves were significantly different (IFDs vs. FPDs: p = 0.01; RPDs vs. IFDs, FPDs: p < 0.01). The median OHRQoL scores of the IFD group immediately after treatment and six years after treatment were significantly higher than those observed before treatment (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the median OHRQoL scores among the three time points in the RPD or FPD groups.Conclusions IFDs showed significantly longer survival rates than FPDs and RPDs in partially edentulous patients. Only in the IFD patients was the OHRQoL level six years after treatment significantly higher than that before treatment.