Training Health Professions preceptors in rural practices: A challenge for Interprofessional practice and education.

The ever-increasing mandate for interprofessional practice and education (IPE) faces challenges in rural settings. Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) launched a preceptor development program as part of its commitment to training interprofessional student groups in rural settings. The objectives of the program were to (1) encourage preceptors to exemplify team behaviors; (2) characterize contemporary learners and learning styles of trainees; (3) encourage interprofessional precepting skills, and (4) apply practical teaching tools in the clinical setting. This was a qualitative observational project performed at OHSU rural faculty primary care clinics. Subjects were a convenience sample of rural interprofessional preceptors who volunteered to participate. Each educational session was based on a prior interview identifying their specific training needs. Data analysis was based on results from an evaluation survey and comments from providers at these sites. Key factors such as dedicated time for preceptor development, good communication between the rural practices and the academic health center, and concerns about billing revenue were discovered to be critical to the success of the program.

Differences in US Regional Healthcare Allocation Guidelines During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals faced unprecedented scarcity of resources without parallel in modern times during the COVID-19 pandemic. This scarcity led healthcare systems and states to develop or modify scarce resource allocation guidelines that could be implemented during "crisis standards of care" (CSC). CSC describes a significant change in healthcare operations and the level of care provided during a public health emergency. OBJECTIVE: Our study provides a comprehensive examination of the latest CSC guidelines in the western region of the USA, where Alaska and Idaho declared CSC, focusing on ethical issues and health disparities. DESIGN: Mixed-methods survey study of physicians and/or ethicists and review of healthcare system and state allocation guidelines. PARTICIPANTS: Ten physicians and/or ethicists who participated in scarce resource allocation guideline development from seven healthcare systems or three state-appointed committees from the western region of the USA including Alaska, California, Idaho, Oregon, and California. RESULTS: All sites surveyed developed allocation guidelines, but only four (40%) were operationalized either statewide or for specific scarce resources. Most guidelines included comorbidities (70%), and half included adjustments for socioeconomic disadvantage (50%), while only one included specific priority groups (10%). Allocation tiebreakers included the life cycle principle and random number generators. Six guidelines evolved over time, removing restrictions such as age, severity of illness, and comorbidities. Additional palliative care (20%) and ethics (50%) resources were planned by some guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Allocation guidelines are essential to support clinicians during public health emergencies; however, significant deficits and differences in guidelines were identified that may perpetuate structural inequities and racism. While a universal triage protocol that is equally accepted by all communities is unlikely, the lack of regional agreement on standards with justification and transparency has the potential to erode public trust and perpetuate inequity.

Economic models for sustainable interprofessional education.

Limited information exists on funding models for interprofessional education (IPE) course delivery, even though potential savings from IPE could be gained in healthcare delivery efficiencies and patient safety. Unanticipated economic barriers to implementing an IPE curriculum across programs and schools in University settings can stymie or even end movement toward collaboration and sustainable culture change. Clarity among stakeholders, including institutional leadership, faculty, and students, is necessary to avoid confusion about IPE tuition costs and funds flow, given that IPE involves multiple schools and programs sharing space, time, faculty, and tuition dollars. In this paper, we consider three funding models for IPE: (a) Centralized (b) Blended, and (c) Decentralized. The strengths and challenges associated with each of these models are discussed. Beginning such a discussion will move us toward understanding the return on investment of IPE.

Improvements in hospice utilization among patients with advanced-stage lung cancer in an integrated health care system.

BACKGROUND: Hospice, a patient-centered care system for those with limited life expectancy, is important for enhancing quality of life and is understudied in integrated health care systems. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 21,860 decedents with advanced-stage lung cancer diagnosed from January 2007 to June 2013 in the national US Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Trends over time, geographic regional variability, and patient and tumor characteristics associated with hospice use and the timing of enrollment were examined. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2013, 70.3% of decedents with advanced-stage lung cancer were enrolled in hospice. Among patients in hospice, 52.9% were enrolled in the last month of life, and 14.7% were enrolled in the last 3 days of life. Hospice enrollment increased (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.07; P < .001), whereas the mean time from the cancer diagnosis to hospice enrollment decreased by 65 days (relative decrease, 32%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.04; P < .001). Relative decreases in late hospice enrollment were observed in the last month (7%; AOR, 0.98; P = .04) and last 3 days of life (26%; AOR, 0.95; P < .001). The Southeast region of the United States had both the highest rate of hospice enrollment and the lowest rate of late enrollment. Patient sociodemographic and lung cancer characteristics were associated with hospice enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced-stage lung cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System, overall and earlier hospice enrollment increased over time. Considerable regional variability in hospice enrollment and the persistence of late enrollment suggests opportunities for improvement in end-of-life care. Cancer 2018;124:426-33. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Communication by nurses in the intensive care unit: qualitative analysis of domains of patient-centered care.

BACKGROUND: High-quality communication is a key determinant and facilitator of patient-centered care. Nurses engage in most of the communication with patients and patients' families in the intensive care unit. OBJECTIVE: To perform a qualitative analysis of nurses' communications. METHODS: Ethnographic observations of 315 hours of interactions and 53 semistructured interviews with 33 nurses were conducted in a 26-bed cardiac-medical intensive care unit in an academic hospital and a 26-bed general intensive care unit in a Veterans Affairs hospital in Portland, Oregon. Communication interactions were categorized into 5 domains of patient-centered care. Interviews were analyzed to identify major themes in nurses' roles and preferences for communicating with patients and patients' families within the domains. RESULTS: Most communication occurred in the domains of biopsychosocial information exchange, patient as person, and clinician as person. Nurses endorsed the importance of the domains of shared power and responsibility and therapeutic alliance but had relatively few communication interactions in these areas. Communication behaviors were strongly influenced by the nurses' roles as translators of information between physicians and patients and the patients' families and what the nurses were and were not willing to communicate to patients and patients' families. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care, including communication, is a collaborative effort. Understanding how nurses engage in patient-centered communication in the intensive care unit can guide future interventions to improve patient-centered care.

Assessing future need for acute care in adult asthmatics: the Profile of Asthma Risk Study: a prospective health maintenance organization-based study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To develop simple clinical tools predictive of acute asthma care and to identify modifiable risk factors. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A large health maintenance organization (430,000 members). PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Adult members (18 to 55 years old) with asthma. INTERVENTIONS: Data from a questionnaire, skin-prick testing for inhalant allergens, and spirometry were collected at the baseline visit. Acute care utilization data were obtained from administrative databases for a subsequent 30-month period. METHODS: This two-phase study first identified and performed a split-sample validation on three clinical tools to determine their predictive ability by employing data from a questionnaire, questionnaire plus spirometry, and questionnaire plus spirometry and skin-prick testing. Second, it identified modifiable independent risk factors. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The 554 study participants generated 173 episodes of acute care over 1,258 person-years of follow-up (0.14 episodes per person per year). Of these, 101 participants had at least one episode, and one third of this group had two or more episodes. Clinical scoring into risk groups was done by reverse stepwise regression analyses. Using relative risks (RRs) as a guide, high-risk, moderate-risk, and low-risk groups were identified. The high-risk groups, 13 to 21% of the validation sample, had a 7- to 11-fold increased risk for hospital care compared to the low-risk groups. The moderate-risk groups, 46 to 50% of the validation sample, had a twofold- to fourfold-increased risk. FEV(1) was the most significant predictor (RR, 4.33). Of the four potentially modifiable risk factors identified, current cigarette smoke exposure (RR, 1.6) and ownership and skin-prick test positivity to cat or dog (RR, 1.5) were the most significant. CONCLUSIONS: These models stratify asthma patients at risk for acute care. Patients with lower FEV(1) values are at significantly higher risk, underscoring the importance of spirometry in asthma care.

Survival, mortality, and location of death for patients seen by a hospital-based palliative care team.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about patient outcomes after discharge planning by inpatient palliative care teams. A major difficulty is that successful discharge planning often effectively limits or ends the team's relationship with the patient and family. The goal of this study was to gather a clearer picture of what happened to our palliative care consult patients after discharge. METHODS: This was a longitudinal survey of all patients seen over a one year period by the inpatient palliative care team at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU). Data were recorded by team members at the time of consultation and supplemented by data from administrative databases and death certificates. RESULTS: The team provided consults to 292 unique patients: 60% were younger than age 65, 39% were female, and 16% were members of an ethnic or racial minority. Almost three quarters of patients carried a non-cancer diagnosis. Of the 292 patients, 37% died in hospital and 63% were discharged alive, either to home (54%), nursing facilities (20%), or inpatient hospice (26%). Of the 183 patients discharged alive, 38% died within 2 weeks, 32% died between 2 weeks and 6 months, 25% were alive at 6 months, and 4% were unknown. Of note, only 10% of patients seen by the consult service were readmitted to OSHU within 30 days, and only 5% of those discharged alive from OHSU ultimately died in an acute care hospital. DISCUSSION: We characterized patient outcomes following inpatient palliative care consultation: where patients are discharged, how long they live, and where they die. Two thirds of patients were able to be discharged, even when death occurred within two weeks. The low rates of readmission and death in an acute care hospital support that the decision to discharge the patients was reasonable and the discharge plan was adequate. Hospital based palliative care teams can play an important and unique role in discharge planning--allowing even patients very near death to leave the hospital if they wish.

Quality of dying in the ICU: ratings by family members.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To explore the quality of the dying experience and associations to higher quality ratings for people who died in an ICU. DESIGN: Retrospective study using medical record review and surveys of family members with the Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) instrument. SETTING: Four ICUs affiliated with a university and a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four family members of 38 ICU decedents. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We explored associations between components of the ICU experience and the overall rating of the quality of the dying experience. Overall, family members reported that symptoms were poorly controlled: pain under control most or all of the time in 47%, and breathing comfortably most or all of the time in 3% of patients. Families expressed a moderate and variable view of the quality of dying resulting in an overall ICU QODD score of 60 +/- 14 (on a scale of 0 to 100) [mean +/- SD]. Higher ICU QODD scores were associated with control of pain (r = 0.42, p = 0.009), control of events (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), a "preparation for death" aspect of the dying experience--feeling at peace with dying (r = 0.69, p < 0.001), and a "whole-person concern"--keeping one's dignity and self-respect (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for symptom and personal care scores, certain whole-person and preparation-for-death aspects of the dying process, and not aggressiveness of end-of-life care, remained the most associated to quality ratings. While future research should explore the important predictors of quality of dying in the ICU, this study suggests that care at the end of life in the ICU include not only managing pain, but also supporting dignity, respect, and peace, and maximizing patient control.

Use of a clinical pathway to manage unsuspected radiographic findings.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe our 5-year experience with a clinical pathway used to ensure the timely communication and evaluation of unsuspected radiologic findings (URFs) noted on clinically requested chest imaging. DESIGN: Prospective data collection on clinical practice. SETTING: Academically affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Pulmonary physicians, nurses, and radiologists. RESULTS: Over a period of 5 years, 1,629 URFs were referred to the pathway (from chest radiographs, 1,359 [83.4%]; from CT scans, 270 [16.6%]). Most URFs (78%) were nodules, with a specific diagnosis made in one third of URFs, and with a specific diagnosis thought to be clinically significant in another one third of URFs. The most common diagnosis was neoplasm, with over two thirds of these diagnoses being lung cancer. One third of lung cancers detected were either stage 1 or 2, with 1 in 17 of all URFs being stage IA lung cancer. The cost of the pathway was estimated at 28,600 dollars per year. CONCLUSIONS: URFs noted on chest imaging are frequently clinically significant, and a systematic approach to managing URFs, such as a clinical pathway, can significantly improve care in a large teaching hospital.

End-of-life care in the critically ill geriatric population.

As the geriatric population in the United States increases and better management of chronic diseases improves survival, more elderly will become critically ill and potentially require treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU). Dan Callahan has written, "... we will live longer lives, be better sustained by medical care, in return for which our deaths in old age are more likely to be drawn out and wild." Although no health care provider hopes for a drawn out and wild death for elderly patients, many geriatric persons will succumb to disease and die after having chosen and received ICU care. Recent data suggest that, on average, 11% of Medicare recipients spend more that 7 days in the ICU within 6 months before death.