Non-traumatic pediatric intracranial hypertension: key points for different etiologies, diagnosis, and treatment.

Intracranial hypertension can be an acute life-threatening event or slowly deteriorating condition, leading to a gradual loss of neurological function. The diagnosis should be taken in a timely fashioned process, which mandates expedite measures to save brain function and sometimes life. An optimal management strategy is selected according to the causative etiology with a core treatment paradigm that can be utilized in various etiologies. Distinct etiologies are intracranial bleeds caused by traumatic brain injury, spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (e.g., neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage), or the rare pediatric hemorrhagic stroke. The other primary pediatric etiologies for elevated intracranial pressure are intracranial mass (e.g., brain tumor) and hydrocephalus related. Other unique etiologies in the pediatric population are related to congenital diseases, infectious diseases, metabolic or endocrine crisis, and idiopathic intracranial pressure. One of the main goals of treatment is to alleviate the growing pressure and prevent the secondary injury to brain parenchyma due to inadequate blood perfusion and eventually inadequate parenchymal oxygenation and metabolic state. Previous literature discussed essential characteristics of the treatment paradigm derived mainly from pediatric brain traumatic injuries' treatment methodology. Yet, many of these etiologies are not related to trauma; thus, the general treatment methodology must be tailored carefully for each patient. This review focuses on the different possible non-traumatic etiologies that can lead to intracranial hypertension with the relevant modification of each etiology's treatment paradigm based on the current literature.

Rhabdomyolysis after spinal fusion surgery: management schema and prevention of a catastrophic complication.

PURPOSE: Rhabdomyolysis is a clinical syndrome with the potential to cause cardiac arrhythmias, renal failure, and even death. Currently, there are no studies regarding risk factors for developing post-operative rhabdomyolysis (POR) after spinal fusion surgeries. Our objective was to study risk factors associated with, and to develop a decision-making framework for post-operative rhabdomyolysis after spinal fusion surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all spinal fusions of three or more levels over 2.25 years by a single surgeon at two centers. POR was defined as a creatine phosphokinase (CPK) greater than 2000 IU/L. RESULTS: 76 surgical procedures on 72 patients were identified. Rate of POR in our cohort was 22% (17/76). Male sex was associated with POR (p < 0.05). Previously validated risk factors: younger age, lower ASA score, elevated BMI, higher pre-operative creatinine, increased intraoperative blood loss, specific surgical positions, and length of surgery, were not associated with POR. In a logistic regression model, male gender increases the odds of POR in all patients 5.82-fold (p = 0.047). In patients without a second surgery within seven days, a logistic regression model suggests each additional level fused via transpsoas approach, and male gender, increases the risk of POR 1.81-times (p = 0.015), and 6.26-times (p = 0.047), respectively. In patients with posterior fusions, a logistic regression model suggests increasing the number of lateral levels fused via transpsoas approach in the same surgery, and male gender, increases the risk of POR 1.68-times and 6.34-times, respectively. In these same subgroups, increased thickness of the psoas major in lateral transpsoas fusions increased risk of POR (p = 0.023, p = 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In spinal fusions, increasing the number of lateral levels fused via transpsoas approach, and male gender, predispose patients to increased risk of POR in those without a second surgery within seven days, and in those with a simultaneous posterior fusion.

Adolescent Disc Disease: Risk Factors and Treatment Success-Related Factors.

OBJECTIVE: A paucity of literature is available discussing the associated risk factors, treatment options (including the use of minimally invasive surgery), and outcomes related to lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in children. We have discussed the risk factors for disc disease among pediatric patients and evaluated the efficacy of the minimally invasive approach. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients with lumbar disc disease who had undergone microdiscectomy at our institution from 2005 to 2016 was conducted. The preoperative presentation, hospital course, postoperative course, and follow-up data (≥3 years) were reviewed. We evaluated the risk factors for LDH and the surgical outcomes for both groups. RESULTS: A total of 52 pediatric patients had undergone 61 lumbar disc surgeries for LDH in our department from 2005 to 2016. Their average age at surgery was 16.65 years. Of the 61 procedures, 48 (78.7%) had been performed via the minimally invasive spine microdiscectomy approach and 13 (21.3%) via the open microdiscectomy approach. The average body mass index for all cases was 29.3 kg/m2. The average interval to diagnosis was 7.9 months. Of the 61 cases, 21 (34.4%) had been required for patients who were competitive athletes. In addition, 15 had been for LDH related to trauma (24.6%). In 46 of the 61 cases, complete resolution of the symptoms had occurred at the 1-year follow-up visit (79.2% of minimally invasive spine microdiscectomy vs 61.5% of open microdiscectomy). CONCLUSION: Risk factors similar to those for adult LDH, such as an elevated body mass index, can be seen in the pediatric population. However, some unique risk factors such as post-traumatic LDH were found in the pediatric age group. Minimally invasive techniques are demonstrably safe and useful in this patient population.

Foraminal Ligaments Tether Upper Cervical Nerve Roots: A Potential Cause of Postoperative C5 Palsy.

Background Nerve root tethering upon dorsal spinal cord (SC) migration has been proposed as a potential mechanism for postoperative C5 palsy (C5P). To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate this relationship by anatomically comparing C5-C6 nerve root translation before and after root untethering by cutting the cervical foraminal ligaments (FL). Objective The aim of this study is to determine if C5 root untethering through FL cutting results in increased root translation. Methods Six cadaveric dissections were performed. Nerve roots were exposed via C4-C6 corpectomies and supraclavicular brachial plexus exposure. Pins were inserted into the C5-C6 roots and adjacent foraminal tubercle. Translation was measured as the distance between pins after the SC was dorsally displaced 5 mm before and after FL cutting. Clinical feasibility of FL release was examined by comparing root translation between standard and extended (complete foraminal decompression) foraminotomies. Translation of root levels before and after FL cutting was compared by two-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results Significantly more nerve root translation was observed if the FL was cut versus not-cut, p = 0.001; no difference was seen between levels, p = 0.33. Performing an extended cervical foraminotomy was technically feasible allowing complete FL release and root untethering, whereas a standard foraminotomy did not. Conclusion FL tether upper cervical nerve roots in their foramina; cutting these ligaments untethers the root and increases translation suggesting they could be harmful in the context of C5P. Further investigation is required examining the value of root untethering in the context of C5P.

Novel Titanium Cages for Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: First Assessment of Subsidence.

INTRODUCTION: Implant subsidence is a potential complication of spinal interbody fusion and may negatively affect patients subjected to procedures relying on indirect decompression such as minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). The porous architecture of a recently developed titanium intervertebral cage maximizes bone-to-implant contact and minimizes stress shielding in laboratory experiments; however, its subsidence rate in patients has not yet been evaluated. The goal of this current study was to evaluate implant subsidence in patients subjected to LLIF. METHODS: Our institutional review board-approved single-center experience included 29 patients who underwent 30 minimally invasive LLIF from July 2017 to September 2018 utilizing the novel 3D-printed porous titanium implants. Radiographs, obtained during routine postoperative follow-up visits, were reviewed for signs of implant subsidence, defined as any appreciable compromise of the vertebral endplates. RESULTS: Radiographic subsidence occurred in 2 cases (6.7%), involving 2 out of 59 porous titanium interbody cages (3.4%). Both cases of subsidence occurred in four-level stand-alone constructs. The patients remained asymptomatic and did not require surgical revision. Ten surgeries were stand-alone constructs, and 20 surgeries included supplemental posterior fixation. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient cohort, subsidence of the porous titanium intervertebral cage occurred in 6.7% of all cases and in 3.4% of all lumbar levels. This subsidence rate is lower compared to previously reported subsidence rates in patients subjected to LLIF using polyetheretherketone implants.