Anticoagulants versus Antiplatelet Treatment in the Medical Management of Carotid Floating Thrombus.

BACKGROUND: Carotid free-floating thrombus (CFT) is a rare cause of stroke describing an intraluminal thrombus that is loosely associated with the arterial wall and manifesting as a filling defect fully surrounded by flow on vascular imaging. Unfortunately, there is no clear consensus among experts on the ideal treatment for this pathology. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients diagnosed with CFT on computed tomography angiogram (CTA) between January 2015-March 2023. We aimed to compare two treatment regimens: anticoagulation (ACT) and antiplatelet (APT) in the treatment of CFT. APT regimens included the use of dual or single antiplatelets (DAPT or SAPT; aspirin, clopidogrel and ticagrelor) and ACT regimens included the use of direct oral anticoagulants, warfarin, heparin or low molecular weight heparin +/- ASA. Patients that underwent mechanical thrombectomy were excluded. RESULTS: During study time there were 8252 acute ischemic stroke hospitalizations, of which 135 (1.63 %) patients were diagnosed with CFT. Sixty-six patients were included in our analysis. Patients assigned to APT were older (60.41years ± 12.82;p < 0.01). Other demographic variables were similar between ACT and APT groups. Complete CFT resolution on repeat vascular imaging was numerically higher at 30 days (58.8 vs 31.6 %, respectively; p = 0.1) and at latest follow-up (70.8 vs 50 %; p = 0.1) on ACT vs APT, respectively without reaching statistical significance. Similarly, there was numerically higher rates of any ICH with ACT compared to APT but it did not achieve statistical significance (27.6 % vs 13.5 %; p = 0.5). There were similar rates of PH1/2 hemorrhagic transformation, independence at discharge and similar hospital length of stay between ACT and APT groups. Patients assigned to APT were more likely to be discharged on their assigned treatment compared to those assigned to ACT (86.5 vs 55.2 %; p < 0.001). The rate of 30-day recurrent stroke was comparable among ACT and APT at 30 days (3.4 vs 0 %; p = 0.1, respectively). Subgroup analysis comparing exclusive ACT vs Dual APT lead to similar results. CONCLUSION: Our study showed comparable efficacy and safety outcomes in CFT patients who were exclusively managed medically with ACT vs APT. Larger prospective studies are needed.

Comparative analysis of stenting for carotid web and atherosclerotic disease.

INTRODUCTION: Carotid Web (CaW) is an increasingly recognized etiology of ischemic stroke, and has been shown to be amenable to endovascular stenting. The technical complexity of stenting for CaW may be lower than for carotid atherosclerotic disease (CAD). We aimed to assess procedural characteristics of stenting for CaW as compared to CAD. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of consecutive patients at a single comprehensive stroke center from 2014 to 2021, who had undergone elective endovascular stent placement for symptomatic CAD or CaW. RESULTS: In total, 118 patients underwent elective stent placement following ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack; 88 patients had CAD and 30 patients had CaW. CAD patients were older (63.2 vs 51.2 years, p < 0.001), less likely to be female (28.4% vs 73.3%, p < 0.001), and more likely to have pre-existing vascular risk factors. Procedure time (73.0 vs 57.5 min, p = 0.007), radiation exposure (1482 vs 1125 milliGray, p = 0.03), filter time (24 vs 14 min, p = 0.04), and use of pre-stent (68.2% vs 0%, p < 0.001) and post-stent (34.1% vs 3.3%, p < 0.001) balloon angioplasty were higher in CAD cases. There was no significant difference between groups in the rate of periprocedural complications such as hypotension, use of vasopressors, or bradycardia. Recurrent stroke/TIA was reported in five CAD patients and 0 CaW patients by the end of the follow-up period (8.3% vs 0%, p = 0.12). In-stent restenosis was detected in seven CAD patients and 0 CaW patients (10.1% vs 0%, p = 0.09) at a median follow-up of 4 vs 16 months (p = 0.01), respectively. Periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage was not observed in either group. CONCLUSION: Stenting for CaW was found to be technically simpler than CAD and not to confer increased risk of baroreceptor dysregulation. Intimal hyperplasia was uncommon in CaW cases.

Tofacitinib-induced Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy with Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) with subsequent immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) is a rare disease associated with compromised immune systems. It has never been described in a patient taking tofacitinib. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old woman with history of systemic lupus erythematous treated with tofacitinib presented with several weeks of intermittent fevers and altered mental status. MRI revealed multifocal T2-weighted FLAIR hyperintensities in the subcortical white matter, including the subcortical U-fibers, without mass effect or contrast enhancement, compatible with PML. Tofacitinib was stopped and the patient's symptoms initially improved. However, the patient presented again less than a week after discharge with three days of left arm weakness, left facial droop, dysarthria, and one day of confusion. Repeat MRI demonstrated interval progression in T2/FLAIR hyperintensities with development of patchy gadolinium enhancement on T1-post contrasted sequences, consistent with development of IRIS in the setting of tofacitinib cessation. DISCUSSION: This is the first case describing PML-IRIS in the setting of administration and subsequent cessation of tofacitinib.

Carotid web: an under-recognized and misdiagnosed ischemic stroke etiology.

BACKGROUND: Carotid web (CaW) constitutes a possible cause of ischemic stroke, particularly large vessel occlusion syndromes. We aim to evaluate misdiagnosis rates and diagnosis trends for CaW. METHODS: Based on CT angiography (CTA), we prospectively identified a cohort of patients with symptomatic CaW treated at two comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) from 2014 to 2020 to assess misdiagnosis. Official CTA reports from the CSCs and referring hospitals were then reviewed for mention of CaW. For diagnosis trends, we retrospectively analyzed a CSC electronic medical record, identifying patients with CaW mentioned in an official CTA report from 2011 to 2020. RESULTS: For misdiagnosis, 56 patients with symptomatic CaW were identified in the CSCs; 16 (28%) had bilateral CaW, totaling 72 CaWs. Only one CaW (5.5%) was reported at referring facilities, from 14 patients/18 CaWs imaged with CTA. Conversely, 43 (69%) CaWs were reported from 49 patients/62 CaWs at the CSC (p<0.01). For diagnosis trends, from 2011 to 2020, 242 patients at a CSC accounted for 266 CTA reports mentioning CaW. The majority of these reports (n=206, 77%) were associated with stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) ICD-9/ICD-10 codes. The rate of CaW diagnosis adjusted per 1000 patients with stroke/TIA increased over time, 2015 being the most significant point of change ('joinpoint'; p=0.01). The analysis of CaW mentions normalized per 1000 CTA reports also showed increasing rates of diagnosis over time (joinpoint:2014; p<0.02). CONCLUSION: CaW was predominantly identified in patients with strokes/TIAs rather than asymptomatic patients. CaW was commonly overlooked in facilities with lower levels of cerebrovascular certification. Recognition of CaW at a CSC has significantly increased over time, independent of overall imaging and stroke patient volume.

Clot composition in retrieved thrombi after mechanical thrombectomy in strokes due to carotid web.

BACKGROUND: The association of carotid webs (CaW) and ischemic stroke is being increasingly recognized. Data on the histologic clot architecture in strokes caused by CaW has not been previously described. Understanding thrombi histopathology may provide insight into the pathophysiology of CaW-related strokes. METHODS: This case series presents three patients with acute ischemic stroke thought to be caused by ipsilateral CaW. Thromboemboli were retrieved from the middle cerebral artery (MCA) by mechanical thrombectomy and histologic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Three patients aged between 41 and 55 years with few to no vascular risk factors presented with symptoms concerning for an acute MCA territory infarction (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) range 10-17). Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) range was 7-8 and all patients had hyperdense vessel sign. Initial CT angiogram was concerning for CaW with no superimposed thrombus, later confirmed with conventional angiography. All patients underwent thrombectomy with full reperfusion. Comprehensive stroke workup failed to reveal other etiologies besides ipsilateral CaW. The histopathologic appearance was of typical fresh mixed thrombi. Qualitative thrombus composition analysis of clot from Case #1 yielded 42.5% fibrin, 50.0% red blood cells (RBC), and 7.5% white blood cells (WBC); Case #2 yielded 46.9% fibrin, 43.4% RBC, and 9.7% WBC; and Case #3 yielded 61.5% fibrin, 31.8% RBC, and 6.7% WBC. CONCLUSIONS: The clot composition of large vessel occlusion strokes from CaW is comparable to the histopathology of previously reported clots from other stroke etiologies. Advanced staining techniques may aid in further characterizing the thrombi of this poorly understood condition.