Mammographically and sonographically occult male DCIS seen only on breast MRI.

Male breast cancer is a rare entity consisting of less than 1% of all breast cancer diagnoses, in which pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without an invasive component accounts for approximately 10% of these diagnoses. Early diagnosis and appropriate management are essential to ensure favorable outcomes. We present a rare case of mammographically and sonographically occult pure DCIS in a male patient presenting with unilateral bloody nipple discharge, highlighting imaging features and the potential utility of breast MRI that aided diagnosis and management.

Abbreviated Breast MRI for Screening High-risk Women: Comparison with the Full Clinical Protocol.

OBJECTIVE: To compare cancer detection rate (CDR), patient recall, and interpretation time of a full protocol MRI (fpMRI) to an abbreviated MRI protocol (abMRI) in high-risk women. METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the IRB. All sequential high-risk screening MRI examinations performed between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, were included. Breast radiologists reviewed patient history, prior images, and abMRI images and recorded their interpretation. Time for interpretation reflected review of the MRI study but not dictation or report generation. Following a minimum 30-day washout period, radiologists interpreted the fpMRI, with interpretation and timing recorded. Data collected included CDR, interpretation time, and patient recall rate. Statistical analyses utilized were Cohen's kappa coefficient, Student's t-test, and McNemar's test. RESULTS: Included were 334 MRI examinations of 286 women. Interpretation time was 60.7 seconds for the abMRI compared to 99.4 seconds for the fpMRI, with an average difference of 38.7 ± 5.4 seconds per patient (P < 0.0001). Recall rates were comparable: the abMRI recall rate was 82/334 (24.6%) and the fpMRI 81/334 (24.3%). All five cancers included were detected by both protocols with equal recall rate. However, there were more recommendations for biopsy with the fpMRI, although this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The abMRI demonstrated comparable CDR to fpMRI, with shortened interpretation time and similar recall rates. Implementing an abMRI to screen high-risk women reduces imaging and interpretation time, thereby improving cost-effectiveness and the patient experience without reduction in cancer detection.