Preference of elderly patients' to oral or intravenous chemotherapy in heavily pre-treated recurrent ovarian cancer: final results of a prospective multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Palliative systemic treatment in elderly gynaecological cancer patients remains a major challenge. In recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), treosulfan an active alkylating drug showed similar cytotoxicity whether as oral (p.o.) or intravenous (i.v.) application. The aim of this innovative trial was to evaluate the preference of elderly patients (≥65 years) for p.o. or i.v. chemotherapy focusing compliance, outcome, toxicities, and geriatric aspects as secondary endpoints. METHODS: Patients with ROC had the free choice between treosulfan i.v. (7000 mg/m2 d1, q29d) or p.o. (600 mg/m2 daily d1-28, q57d). Only indecisive participants were randomized. RESULTS: Overall 123 patients with 2nd to 5th recurrence were registered and 119 received at least one cycle of chemotherapy. 85.7% preferred treosulfan i.v. and 14.3% oral, where only three patients were randomized. Main reasons for i.v. preference associated with individual expectations of lower rate of gastrointestinal disorders, higher activity and tolerability of treatment. Median of applied chemotherapies was three (range 1-12 cycles), with most common grade 3/4 toxicities thrombopenia (18.7%), leukopenia (15.7%), ascites (7.6%), bowel obstruction (6.7%), and abdominal pain (4.2%). Median time until progression/overall survival was 5.2/7.8 months (i.v.), and 5.6/10.4 months (p.o.), respectively, without significant differences in efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer asked and demonstrated active participation in the decision-making process of their oncological treatment and favoured predominantly the i.v. application. Treosulfan was generally well-tolerated despite comorbidities and heavy pre-treatment. Our study demonstrates that patients' preference did not influence prognosis negatively and remains important in gynaecologic oncology decision practice. EUDRACT NR: 2004-000719-25; NCT 00170690.

NADIR: A Non-Interventional Study on the Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia Using Lipegfilgrastim - First Interim Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The non-interventional study (NIS) NADIR was designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of lipegfilgrastim, a novel glycopegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, in reducing the risk of both febrile and severe neutropenia. METHODS: Here, the interim analysis of NIS Nadir performed under real-world conditions at 80 oncology practices across Germany is reported. For a patient to be included, lipegfilgrastim at a subcutaneous single dose of 6 mg had to be administered during at least 1 cycle of the chemotherapy under consideration. RESULTS: The interim analysis included 224 patients. Median patient age was 61.1 years (interquartile range 51.2-70.2 years). Main tumor type was breast cancer followed by lung cancer, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (46.0, 13.4, and 10.7%, respectively). When lipegfilgrastim was given as primary prophylaxis, no patient developed febrile neutropenia (FN). 1.3% of patients developed FN when primary prophylaxis was withheld. Only 68.6% of patients undergoing chemotherapy and at high risk (> 20%) of developing FN were treated with lipegfilgrastim during the first cycle, exposing disparity between real-world practices and current treatment guidelines. Lipegfilgrastim was well tolerated. The only grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event was anemia in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Lipegfilgrastim was effective and safe when administered for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia under real-world conditions.

ABC transporter gene expression in benign and malignant ovarian tissue.

OBJECTIVE: ATP-binding Cassette (ABC) transporters are thought to cause multiple drug resistance (MDR) in various carcinomas. Gene expression data from individual transporters in ovarian cancer tissue is contradictory and also scarce for some of them. RNA levels of a panel of ABC transporters were collected and analyzed to get a more detailed overview which transporters are of importance in resistance to chemotherapeutic agents in ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: Real-time PCR was used to determine RNA expression levels of 9 ABC transporters in 50 benign tissue samples and 50 recurrent ovarian cancer samples. Genes exhibiting a significant difference between those two groups were further evaluated in 50 primary cancer samples. Data were analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and multiple Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U-tests with Shaffer correction. RESULTS: Gene expression of four transporters (ABCC1, ABCC2, ABCC3, and ABCB3) was significantly elevated in recurrent cancer lesions compared to benign tissue. Expression levels of these 4 ABC transporters were further analyzed in primary ovarian cancer lesions. A significant difference between primary and recurrent tumor tissue was found in all four genes. Changes in gene expression between benign samples and primary lesions were minor and not relevant. CONCLUSIONS: Four of the examined ABC transporters are likely to play a role in the MDR of ovarian carcinoma. Gene expression of these transporters seems only up regulated through chemotherapy. The thesis that MDR in ovarian cancer is acquired through therapy itself and not present ab initio is supported by these findings.

Carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with oral enzastaurin in advanced ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer: results from a safety lead-in study.

INTRODUCTION: This safety lead-in study examined the pharmacokinetic and adverse event profile of combining enzastaurin with paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy for the treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer and primary peritoneal carcinoma. The specific objectives of this study were to assess safety and tolerability after 2 cycles of treatment, to determine if enzastaurin alters paclitaxel and carboplatin pharmacokinetics, and to determine if enzastaurin pharmacokinetics is affected by paclitaxel and carboplatin. METHODS: After debulking surgery, patients with previously untreated epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma received sequential paclitaxel (175 mg/m) and carboplatin (area under the curve, 5 mg x min/mL) on day 1 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Patients ingested an oral loading dose of 1125 mg enzastaurin on day 4 of cycle 1, followed by oral 500-mg enzastaurin daily until the end of therapy. Adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. RESULTS: There were 5 serious adverse events in 4 of 11 patients: soft tissue injury, wound infection, intestinal fistula, clostridial infection, and anemia. Coadministration with enzastaurin did not significantly alter paclitaxel and carboplatin pharmacokinetics (area under the curve ratio of treatment comparison asymptotically equal to 1.05 and 1.06, respectively). Enzastaurin exposures were unchanged (Cav,ss ratio of treatment comparison asymptotically equal to 0.95 for average steady-state total analyte concentrations of enzastaurin and its metabolite). CONCLUSIONS: Adding enzastaurin to paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy is feasible for advanced ovarian cancer after radical cytoreduction. Enzastaurin did not alter paclitaxel or carboplatin pharmacokinetics, and enzastaurin exposures were not significantly changed by carboplatin and paclitaxel.