Biomechanics of Different Types of PEEK as Implant Materials for Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical behavior of different types of PEEK as implant materials for mandibular implant-retained overdentures. MATERIALS & METHODS: Virtual models of mandibular overdentures retained by two interforaminal implants were simulated. In each model, one implant material was assumed resulting in four models; titanium, carbon-reinforced PEEK, ceramic-filled PEEK and unfilled PEEK models. Unilateral vertical and oblique loads were applied separately. Von-Mises stresses and maximum equivalent strain values were computed. RESULTS: All PEEK implant models induced higher stresses in the cervical portion of peri-implant bone compared to the titanium model. A more homogenous stress distribution pattern along the whole length of the titanium implants was observed compared to PEEK implants. The highest amount of strain values was recorded in the unfilled PEEK implants. CONCLUSIONS: Titanium remains to be the most optimum material for dental implants. Unfilled and ceramic filled PEEK might not be recommended as a dental implant material due to the high stresses generated within the implant bodies and cervical part of peri-implant bone under oblique load which might contribute to an increased probability of implant body fracture and marginal bone loss.

Mode of bond failure between 3D-printed denture teeth and printed resin base material: effect of fabrication technique and dynamic loading. An in-vitro study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the failure load of 3D-printed denture resin material and teeth before and after dynamic loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 specimens were fabricated following ISO/TS 19736 and were divided into two equal groups. In the test group, the cylindrical base and denture teeth were 3D printed separately and then luted together. In the control group, the specimens were fabricated from conventional heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and commercially available denture teeth using the compression-molding technique. Ten specimens from each group were subjected to dynamic load of 50 N for 250,000 cycles in a chewing simulator. All specimens were subjected to static load of 50 N using Instron machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute until fracture. The fractured surfaces were analyzed using field emission scanning electron microscopy. The failure loads were calculated and compared using analysis of variance (P < .05). RESULTS: All specimens survived the loading, undergoing 250,000 cycles without fracture. The mean failure load was influenced by fabrication technique and was significantly higher for the 3D-printed test group (P = .028). 3D-printed teeth showed a mixed mode of fracture, whereas in the control group, the specimens showed cohesive fracture within the teeth. CONCLUSION: The fabrication technique has an influence on the mode of failure between acrylic teeth and resin base material. Cohesive failure in teeth was predominant in the conventional group, suggesting possibly higher bond strength between the teeth and resin base in this group. The observed failure modes reveal that both fabrication techniques exhibited satisfactory bond strength. Chewing simulation did not significantly influence the bond strength of any of the tested groups.

Does build angle have an influence on surface roughness of anterior 3D-printed restorations? An in-vitro study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of build direction on the surface roughness (Ra) of stereolithography (SLA) printed full-coverage anterior dental restorations before and after surface polishing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 45 full-coverage dental restorations were 3D printed using the SLA additive manufacturing technique. Five groups were defined based on the build angles: 90, 120, 135, 150, and 180 degrees. The Ra was measured with the contact profilometer to evaluate the arithmetic average of the absolute Ra value on the labial surface before and after polishing procedures. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, and statistical significance was set at α = .05. RESULTS: The highest Ra was recorded in specimens printed with the 90-degree build angle, whereas the lowest values were recorded in specimens printed with the 180-degree build angle (P = .000). In all groups, the Ra values measured after polishing were significantly lower than prepolished values (P = .000), with no difference among the different build angles. CONCLUSION: Build angle significantly influenced the Ra of the SLA-printed full-coverage restorations. Polishing minimized the effect of build angle on the Ra. The 180-degree build angle is recommended when SLA printing an anterior restoration, as it provides the lowest Ra values and also requires a minimal support area and minimal number of support structures.