Beam monitor calibration of a synchrotron-based scanned light-ion beam delivery system.

PURPOSE: This paper presents the implementation and comparison of two independent methods of beam monitor calibration in terms of number of particles for scanned proton and carbon ion beams. METHODS: In the first method, called the single-layer method, dose-area-product to water (DAPw) is derived from the absorbed dose to water determined using a Roos-type plane-parallel ionization chamber in single-energy scanned beams. This is considered the reference method for the beam monitor calibration in the clinically relevant proton and carbon energy ranges. In the second method, called the single-spot method, DAPw of a single central spot is determined using a Bragg-peak (BP) type large-area plane-parallel ionization chamber. Emphasis is given to the detailed characterization of the ionization chambers used for the beam monitor calibration. For both methods a detailed uncertainty budget on the DAPw determination is provided as well as on the derivation of the number of particles. RESULTS: Both calibration methods agreed on average within 1.1% for protons and within 2.6% for carbon ions. The uncertainty on DAPw using single-layer beams is 2.1% for protons and 3.1% for carbon ions with major contributions from the available values of kQ and the average spot spacing in both lateral directions. The uncertainty using the single-spot method is 2.2% for protons and 3.2% for carbon ions with major contributions from the available values of kQ and the non-uniformity of the BP chamber response, which can lead to a correction of up-to 3.2%. For the number of particles, an additional dominant uncertainty component for the mean stopping power per incident proton (or the CEMA) needs to be added. CONCLUSION: The agreement between both methods enhances confidence in the beam monitor calibration and the estimated uncertainty. The single-layer method can be used as a reference and the single-spot method is an alternative that, when more accumulated knowledge and data on the method becomes available, can be used as a redundant dose monitor calibration method. This work, together with the overview of information from the literature provided here, is a first step towards comprehensive information on the single-spot method.

Characterization of the PTW-34089 type 147 mm diameter large-area ionization chamber for use in light-ion beams.

A newly-designed large-area plane-parallel ionization chamber (of type PTW 34089), denoted BPC150, with a nominal active volume diameter of 147 mm is characterized in this study. Such chambers exhibit benefits compared to smaller chambers in the field of scanned light-ion beam dosimetry because they capture a larger fraction of the laterally-spread beam fragments and ease positioning with respect to small fields. The chamber was characterized in 60Co, 200 kV x-ray, proton and carbon ion beams. The chamber-specific beam-quality correction factor kQ,Q0 was determined. To investigate the homogeneity of the chamber's response, a radial response map was acquired. An edge correction was applied when the proton beam only partly impinged on the chamber's active surface. The measured response map showed that the response in the chamber's center is 3% lower than the average response over the total active area. Furthermore, percentage depth dose (PDD) curves in carbon ions were acquired and compared to those obtained with smaller-diameter chambers (i.e. 81.6 mm and 39.6 mm) as well as with results from Monte Carlo simulations. The measured absorbed dose to water cross calibration coefficients resulted in a kQ,Q0 of 0.981 ± 0.020. Regarding carbon ion PDD curves, relative differences between the BPC150 and smaller chambers were observed, especially for higher energies and in the fragmentation tail. These differences reached 10%-22% in the fragmentation tail (compared to the 81.6 mm diameter chamber). Differences increased when comparing to a chamber with 39.6 mm diameter. The provided results characterize the BPC150 thoroughly for usage in scanned light-ion beam dosimetry and demonstrate its advantage of capturing a larger fraction of the laterally-integrated dose in the fragmentation tail.

A GATE/Geant4 beam model for the MedAustron non-isocentric proton treatment plans quality assurance.

PURPOSE: To present a reference Monte Carlo (MC) beam model developed in GATE/Geant4 for the MedAustron fixed beam line. The proposed model includes an absolute dose calibration in Dose-Area-Product (DAP) and it has been validated within clinical tolerances for non-isocentric treatments as routinely performed at MedAustron. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The proton beam model was parametrized at the nozzle entrance considering optic and energy properties of the pencil beam. The calibration in terms of absorbed dose to water was performed exploiting the relationship between number of particles and DAP by mean of a recent formalism. Typical longitudinal dose distribution parameters (range, distal penumbra and modulation) and transverse dose distribution parameters (spot sizes, field sizes and lateral penumbra) were evaluated. The model was validated in water, considering regular-shaped dose distribution as well as clinical plans delivered in non-isocentric conditions. RESULTS: Simulated parameters agree with measurements within the clinical requirements at different air gaps. The agreement of distal and longitudinal dose distribution parameters is mostly better than 1 mm. The dose difference in reference conditions and for 3D dose delivery in water is within 0.5% and 1.2%, respectively. Clinical plans were reproduced within 3%. CONCLUSION: A full nozzle beam model for active scanning proton pencil beam is described using GATE/Geant4. Absolute dose calibration based on DAP formalism was implemented. The beam model is fully validated in water over a wide range of clinical scenarios and will be inserted as a reference tool for research and for independent dose calculation in the clinical routine.