Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anesteziol Reanimatol ; (6): 25-31, 2002.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12611153

RESUMO

The paper presents the results of a study of the impact of autoPEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) on gas exchange in the lungs, their biomechanical characteristics, the transport and consumption of oxygen by inverting the inspiration/expiration ratio under the volume-controlled mechanical ventilation of the lung (VCMVL) in patients with acute parenchymatous lung lesion, as well as how to choose the optimum inspiration/expiration ratio in VCMVL by analyzing the pattern of total PEEP (the sum of positioning and autoPEEP) in this group of patients.


Assuntos
Pneumopatias/fisiopatologia , Respiração por Pressão Positiva Intrínseca/fisiopatologia , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/métodos , Mecânica Respiratória/fisiologia , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz , Feminino , Humanos , Pneumopatias/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxigênio/sangue , Respiração por Pressão Positiva Intrínseca/etiologia , Circulação Pulmonar/fisiologia , Troca Gasosa Pulmonar/fisiologia
2.
Anesteziol Reanimatol ; (2): 50-3, 2000.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10833838

RESUMO

Mechanical ventilation of the lungs (MVL) with positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is difficult in patients with unilateral lung damage because of uneven distribution of volumes and pressures in the involved and intact lungs. Harmful effects are easier manifested under such conditions. Selective MVL with selective PEEP is widely used abroad for optimizing MVL, but this method is rather expensive and is not devoid of shortcomings. Our study carried out in 32 patients with unilateral lung involvement showed that traditional MVL with general PEEP can effectively (in 75% cases) regulate gaseous exchange and decrease its untoward effects if MVL is performed with the patient lying on the healthy side and not supine. MVL in patients with unilateral lung injury lying on the healthy side can be a simpler and cheaper alternative to selective MVL with selective PEEP.


Assuntos
Drenagem Postural/métodos , Lesão Pulmonar , Pneumonia/terapia , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/métodos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/terapia , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Drenagem Postural/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/fisiopatologia , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/fisiopatologia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/fisiopatologia
3.
Anesteziol Reanimatol ; (1): 18-23, 1999.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10199039

RESUMO

The relationship between the mean pressure in the trachea, generated in mechanical ventilation of the lungs (Ptr.m), and normal arterial oxygenation is linear in ventilated patients with severe bilateral acute parenchymatous damage to the lungs. Under conditions of mechanical ventilation of the lungs (MVL) with regulated volume, constant end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and inspiratory pause (eIP) are effective methods for regulating Ptr.m. However, the efficacy of regulating Ptr.m by PEEP and IF for each clinical case is different. The algorithm of using PEEP and IF for optimizing the respiratory pattern in this category of patients is not clear, too. The results indicate that optimization of MVL with controlled volume should be started with selecting the optimal level of PEEP for each patient. The level of Ptr.m should not be increased immediately at by of prolonging eIP, because the probability of compromising the hemodynamics is higher in such a case than the probability of improving blood oxygenation. Only after selecting the optimal PEEP is it permissible to try to improve arterial oxygenation by prolonging xx, because under such conditions the efficacy of prolonged inspiration is notably increased. Our data indicate that eIP no higher than 30% of the respiratory cycle (inspiration/expiration = 1.5/1) is the optimal. A further increase of eIP gives rise to a tendency towards decrease of arterial oxygenation and oxygen transport to tissues.


Assuntos
Pneumopatias/terapia , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Algoritmos , Humanos , Respiração com Pressão Positiva Intermitente , Pneumopatias/fisiopatologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Circulação Pulmonar , Análise de Regressão , Testes de Função Respiratória , Síndrome
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...