Long-term survival after thoracoscopic lung volume reduction: a multiinstitutional review.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that bilateral thoracoscopic lung volume reduction (BTLVR) yields significantly better long-term survival than unilateral thoracoscopic lung volume reduction (UTLVR). METHODS: All perioperative data were collected at the time of the procedure. Follow-up data were obtained during office visits or by telephone. RESULTS: A total of 673 patients underwent thoracoscopic LVR: 343 had either simultaneous or staged BTLVR and 330, UTLVR. As of July 1998, follow-up was available on 667 (99%) of the 673 patients with a mean follow-up of 24.3 months. The patients in the BTLVR group were significantly younger (62.6+/-8.0 years versus 65.4+/-8.1 years; p < 0.0001), had a higher preoperative arterial oxygen tension (69.7+/-12 mm Hg versus 65.3+/-11 mm Hg; p < 0.0001), and had a superior preoperative 6-minute walk performance (279.9+/-93.6 m [933+/-312 feet] versus 244.5+/-101.4 m [815+/-338 feet] p < 0.0001). There was no difference in the operative mortality rate between the two groups (UTLVR, 5.1%, and BTLVR, 7%). Actuarial survival rates for the UTLVR group at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 86%, 75%, and 69%, respectively versus 90%, 81%, and 74%, respectively, for the BTLVR group (p = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous reports, survival after BTLVR was not superior to that after UTLVR even though the former group appeared to have a lower risk preoperatively because of younger age, higher arterial oxygen tension, more advantageous anatomy, and better functional status. Despite thoracoscopic LVR, the actuarial mortality rate approached 30% at 3 years, and this calls into question whether this procedure offers any survival advantage to patients with end-stage emphysema.

Nursing care of the thoracoscopic lung volume reduction patient.

BACKGROUND: Several methods to surgically enhance pulmonary function and improve the quality of life in patients with bullous emphysema are currently being evaluated. One of these methods, lung volume reduction, is performed in patients with bullous emphysema that can no longer be well managed with medical therapy. OBJECTIVES: The focus of this article is to review bullectomy via unilateral thoracoscopy with an endoscopic stapler in the management of end-stage pulmonary emphysema, and to discuss nursing care of these patients. METHODS: An experimental study was used, including review of the literature and analysis of clinical experience using chi-square and t test analyses of pre- and postoperative variables. RESULTS: At 3-month follow-up there were significant improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, minute volume ventilation, partial pressure of oxygen, residual volume, and 6-minute walk when pre- and postoperative parameters were compared. Operative mortality was 4%, with the most common complication being prolonged air leak, occurring in 30% of patients studied. CONCLUSIONS: There is now consistent preliminary information to support the concept that lung volume reduction improves pulmonary function and quality of life in a significant percentage of patients.

Unilateral video-assisted thoracic surgical lung reduction.

BACKGROUND: Lung reduction has been demonstrated to be a promising treatment for end-stage emphysema when performed on both lungs via sternotomy. The role for a thoracoscopic approach has not yet been determined. METHODS: Unilateral video-assisted thoracic surgical lung reduction was performed on 50 patients for the treatment of end-stage emphysema. There were 34 men and 16 women with a mean age of 61.5 years (range, 31 to 78 years). Emphysema was secondary to smoking in 45 patients (90%), and alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency in 5 patients (10%), 4 of whom had smoked in the past. Lung reduction was performed unilaterally using a thoracoscope and a stapled resection without the routine use of bovine pericardium. The side to be operated on and site of resection were determined preoperatively by examination of the perfusion and computed tomographic scans of the lungs. The average amount of lung removed was 59 +/- 15 g (range, 29 to 111 g). RESULTS: Morbidity included prolonged air leak in 15 patients (30%), bleeding in 3 (6%), pneumonia requiring reintubation in 3 (6%), myocardial infarction in 1 (2%), and perforated ulcer in 1 (2%). Seven patients (14%) required a second thoracic procedure for management of these complications. Two patients died, for an operative mortality of 4%. Follow-up obtained between 1 and 3 months in 25 patients revealed significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (0.71 to 0.95 L; p < 0.001), forced vital capacity (2.24 to 2.58 L; p < 0.01), and oxygen tension (59 to 67 mm Hg; p < 0.01). The improvement in functional capacity as measured by 6-minute walk approached statistical significance (771 to 923 ft; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Significant subjective improvement in dyspnea has been noted in 41 of 48 hospital survivors (85%). For patients with end-stage emphysema, unilateral video-assisted thoracic surgical lung reduction appears to be a preferable alternative to standard medical management.

Critical pathways as an effective tool to reduce cardiac transplantation hospitalization and charges.

A critical pathway is a component of managed care focusing on outcome-oriented, cost-effective care. This retrospective review of 74 cardiac transplants in 72 patients evaluated the influence of critical pathways on clinical management, length of hospitalization, and hospital charges. Transplant patients were divided into group 1 (n = 51), which received standard primary nursing care, and group 2 (n = 23), which received nursing case management using a critical pathway. The number of intensive care unit days for group 2 was significantly smaller than for group 1, as were duration of hospitalization and hospital charges. The critical pathway provided for systematic delivery of care and decreased length of hospitalization and charges without compromising safety or quality.