Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound ; 46(5): 361-7, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16250391

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to compare direct (analog) viewing of thoracic radiographs with digitized images obtained with a radiographic scanner and seven digital cameras for detection of pulmonary nodules. Direct viewing of the analog radiographs was significantly better than all digitized methods (P<0.01). Significant variations exist between the radiographic scanner and the digital cameras. The scanner (Kodak LS75) was significantly better than the Kodak DC 4800 and the Sony DSC-707 cameras (P<0.05). The Nikon 995, Canon EOS-D30, and Ricoh i500 were significantly better than the Sony DSC-707 (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the Kodak DC 3800, Kodak DC 4800, and the Sony DSC-707. For pairwise comparison of raters (when evaluating the radiographs individually compared with the consensus), the raters matched the consensus rating from 85% to 92% with no significant difference between raters.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/veterinária , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica/instrumentação , Animais , Gatos , Cães , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Radiografia Torácica/veterinária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...