Patient-Level Factors Associated with Oncology Provider-Delivered Brief Tobacco Treatment Among Recently Diagnosed Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: A cancer diagnosis is seen as a "teachable moment" for patients to consider changing their behavioral risk factors, such as smoking. It also offers an opportunity for oncology providers to engage in a dialogue about how they can support patients changing their smoking behaviors. Brief, evidence-based tobacco cessation treatment delivered by oncology providers through the 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist Arrange) model is recommended, but provision to cancer patients remains suboptimal. AIM: Explore patient-level factors associated with 5As receipt among current smokers with a newly diagnosed cancer. METHOD: A total of 303 patients self-reported whether they received each of the 5As during their most recent oncology care visit. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to identify patient-level factors associated with 5As receipt. RESULTS: Oncology provider-delivered 5As rates ranged from 81.5% (Ask) to 30.7% (Arrange). 5As receipt was associated with: reporting lower illness-related stigma, diagnosis of a comorbid smoking-related disease, diagnosis of a smoking-related cancer, and diagnosis of a non-advanced cancer. CONCLUSION: Findings support previous literature in which smoking-related diagnoses were associated with greater receipt of 5As; however, disparities in the receipt of 5As existed for patients with more advanced cancer diagnoses and illness-related stigma. Inequities in the provision of quit assistance may further decrease treatment effectiveness and survival expectancy among certain patient populations. These findings are, therefore, important as they identify specific patient-level factors associated with lower 5As receipt among newly diagnosed cancer patients.

Barriers to mental health service use among distressed family caregivers of lung cancer patients.

Although family caregivers of patients with lung and other cancers show high rates of psychological distress, they underuse mental health services. This qualitative study aimed to identify barriers to mental health service use among 21 distressed family caregivers of lung cancer patients. Caregivers had not received mental health services during the patient's initial months of care at a comprehensive cancer centre in New York City. Thematic analysis of interview data was framed by Andersen's model of health service use and Corrigan's stigma theory. Results of our analysis expand Andersen's model by providing a description of need variables (e.g. psychiatric symptoms), enabling factors (e.g. finances), and psychosocial factors associated with caregivers' non-use of mental health services. Regarding psychosocial factors, caregivers expressed negative perceptions of mental health professionals and a desire for independent management of emotional concerns. Additionally, caregivers perceived a conflict between mental health service use and the caregiving role (e.g. prioritising the patient's needs). Although caregivers denied stigma associated with service use, their anticipated negative self-perceptions if they were to use services suggest that stigma may have influenced their decision to not seek services. Findings suggest that interventions to improve caregivers' uptake of mental health services should address perceived barriers.

Smoking cessation following CT screening for early detection of lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess the impact of lung cancer screening participation on smoking cessation. METHODS: Individuals (n = 134) who reported active smoking at the time of enrollment in our Early Lung Cancer Action Program (ELCAP) completed a brief, follow-up telephone interview assessing any changes in smoking patterns following lung cancer screening. Using logistic regression, we estimated the probability of decreasing or quitting smoking using each enrollee's background information and computed tomography (CT) scan results. RESULTS: Most survey respondents (74%) agreed that participation in the ELCAP increased their motivation for quitting smoking. In terms of self-reported changes in smoking behavior, 31 (23%) reported that they had quit and 35 (27%) decreased their smoking patterns. Several significant covariates of smoking cessation were identified: perceived benefit of quitting (OR 4.02), cancer anxiety (OR 2.49), younger age (OR 2.47), and abnormal CT finding (1.97). CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses suggest that low-dose helical CT scanning may serve as a strong catalyst for smoking cessation and that delivery of effective smoking cessation interventions along with CT scanning represents a potential opportunity to increase the overall cancer prevention benefit of lung cancer screening.

Dental students' attitudes toward smoking cessation guidelines.

Dentists can be effective in helping their patients achieve smoking cessation. To plan a didactic program, we explored the smoking cessation attitudes and practices of dental students and identified barriers to service provision in the dental setting. We assessed 244 fourth-year dental students at New York University College of Dentistry through a self-report survey. The instrument included a twenty-nine-item measure assessing attitudes towards tobacco-use counseling and adherence to National Cancer Institute tobacco cessation guidelines. The survey also assessed demographics, tobacco use history, and level of preparation to provide services. Generally, students endorsed tobacco prevention practices, but perceived barriers to service provision. Students provided counseling inconsistently, with 69 percent asking about smoking, 58 percent advising cessation, 24 percent offering assistance, and 22 percent providing followup on a routine basis. Those who provided more counseling were more likely to have undergone formal training in smoking cessation, did not feel time was a barrier to counseling, and had more favorable beliefs about dentists' role in promoting smoking cessation. Study findings indicate great receptivity among students as well as a critical need and opportunity to include comprehensive cessation counseling training in the dental curriculum.

A survey of smoking status and cancer risk perceptions among participants attending a hospital-based head and neck screening program.

Abstract Screening for head and neck cancer is underutilized. Given that lack of knowledge of the risk factors may partially account for screening underutilization. we surveyed subjective risk and knowledge of risk factors for head and neck cancer among 124 individuals who attended a free. hospital-based head and neck cancer screening. Few participants were current smokers. Most attendees perceived their risk as similar to others of their age and sex. Personal health habits comprised almost all of the risk-decreasing factors, yet less than half of the risk-increasing factors. generated. Personal habits were less frequently endorsed than factors such as pollution and heredity. Those who mentioned a risk behavior, or a family cancer history, reported higher subjective risk. Those who mentioned a personal health habit reported lower subjective risk. Results highlight needed efforts to increase screening among high-risk individuals through targeted education messages.

Nicotine dependence and withdrawal in an oncology setting: a risk factor for psychiatric comorbidity and treatment non-adherence.

Highly nicotine dependent oncology patients are at high risk for psychiatric morbidity when they enter the medical care setting where smoking restrictions apply. Nicotine withdrawal symptoms exacerbate cancer-related distress as well as common physical side effects of cancer treatment. This case report illustrates the management of a patient whose ongoing treatment for bladder cancer was jeopardized as a result of nicotine dependence and withdrawal. Several associated complications are described, the most serious of which were his acute anxiety and non-adherence to medical recommendations. A short-term management approach that included anxiolytics and nicotine replacement was effectively used to reduce this patient's excessive anxiety and thus facilitate compliance with stressful treatments. The severity of complications that can result from untreated nicotine dependence and withdrawal underscores the importance of assessing and monitoring smoking status in every patient. Greater staff awareness of the clinical practice guidelines regarding the diagnosis and treatment of nicotine dependence will likely result in improved patient care and compliance.

Motivating smoking cessation among dental patients: smokers' interest in biomarker testing for susceptibility to tobacco-related cancers.

This study examined interest in receiving biomarker testing for tobacco-related cancer susceptibility among 148 smokers seeking routine oral health care in a public dental clinic. Patients completed a brief, self-report survey assessing their smoking history, tobacco-related illness history, readiness to quit smoking, perceived risk and worry about cancer, and their interest in being tested for genetic susceptibility for tobacco-related cancers. Participants were socioeconomically and ethnically diverse, and were primarily long-standing, nicotine-dependent smokers. Most reported (83%) interest in biomarker feedback, and most (86%) understood that a certain genetic make-up could place them at increased risk for tobacco-related cancers. Those participants who felt that quitting smoking would reduce future cancer risk, were at least in the contemplation stage of quitting readiness, felt more worried and more at risk for developing cancer, women and younger smokers were more interested in genetic testing (all ps < 0.20). Multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that gender and risk perceptions were associated with interest in testing. The public dental clinic setting holds potential for innovative smoking cessation interventions using personalized risk feedback.

Smoking history and cancer patient survival: a hospital cancer registry study.

While tobacco use is clearly the most preventable cause of cancer, little is known about whether smoking adversely influences cancer patients' survival. The goal of this study was to examine the effect of smoking history on survival among cancer patients. Data from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center's tumor registry was used to identify 25,436 cases of cancer (12,447 male patients and 12,989 female patients). Information regarding smoking and alcohol consumption, histologic grade, tumor stage, and survival time was available. Proportional hazard analysis was used to examine the effect of smoking on the death from all causes among patients. Patients who had a history of smoking were found to have a lower rate of survival than nonsmokers. After controlling for age, race, alcohol use, and histologic grade, the risk ratios were 1.55 for males and 1.43 for females. A dose-response relationship was found between ever-smoking and cancer patient survival. The predictive effect of smoking on survival was significant for patients with oral, pancreatic, breast, and prostate cancers, but not for esophageal, stomach, colon, rectum, laryngeal, lung, cervix uteri, urinary bladder, and kidney cancers. Black patients with oral or breast cancer had a poorer prognosis associated with smoking compared with white and other nonwhite patients. The strongest effect of smoking on survival was found mainly among patients with breast cancer with a distant tumor stage or with prostate cancer with a regional tumor stage. Alcohol use alone was associated with a higher risk of death for nonsmokers with oral and pancreatic cancers than for similar cancer patients without a history of alcohol use. Smoking history plays a critical role in influencing cancer patient survival, especially for patients diagnosed with oral, pancreatic, breast, or prostatic cancers. In addition, alcohol consumption is independently related to survival in patients with oral and pancreatic cancers. Our study suggests that a potential means of improving cancer patient survival, especially from oral, pancreatic, breast, and prostatic cancers, may be achieved through smoking cessation.

Novel approaches to the prevention of head and neck cancer.

Head and neck cancer represents a paradigm for the prevention of environmentally induced diseases. Etiologic factors, including tobacco and alcohol, have been well established. Furthermore, disease development may depend not only upon such exposures but also upon a genetically defined susceptibility to exposure-induced DNA damage. As discussed in this review, the ability to identify etiologic factors, both external and host related, will lead to improved identification of individuals at risk. The development of novel strategies for cancer prevention will be promoted, among which lifestyle alteration will arguably play the most significant role. Therefore, this review places special emphasis on the translation of the understanding of disease into more effective behavioral modification strategies.

Prevalence and predictors of continued tobacco use after treatment of patients with head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with head and neck cancer who continue to smoke after diagnosis and treatment are more likely than patients who quit to experience tumor recurrence and second primary malignancies. Therefore, information about patients' smoking status and the factors associated with continued tobacco use are important considerations in the comprehensive care patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Study participants were 144 patients with newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract who underwent surgical treatment, with or without postoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy, 3-15 months before assessment of their postoperative tobacco use. RESULTS: Among the 74 patients who had smoked in the year before diagnosis, 35% reported continued tobacco use after surgery. Compared with patients who abstained from smoking, patients who continued to use tobacco were less likely to have received postoperative radiotherapy, to have had less extensive disease, to have had oral cavity disease, and to have had higher levels of education. Hierarchical regression analysis indicated that most of the explained variance in smoking status could be accounted for on the first step of analysis by disease site. Interest in smoking cessation was high, and most patients made multiple attempts to quit. CONCLUSIONS: Although the diagnosis of a tobacco-related malignancy clearly represents a strong catalyst for smoking cessation, a sizable subgroup of patients continue to smoke. Patients with less severe disease who undergo less extensive treatment are particularly at risk for continued tobacco use. These data highlight the importance of developing smoking cessation interventions designed to meet the demographic, disease, treatment, and tobacco-use characteristics of this patient population.

Lives in a balance: perceived family functioning and the psychosocial adjustment of adolescent cancer survivors.

Childhood cancer patients have a greater likelihood of long-term survival than ever before. This study examined both the perceived family functioning of adolescents who had successfully completed treatment for pediatric cancer and the relationship between family functioning and post-treatment adjustment. Eighty-eight adolescent survivors of hematologic malignancies were assessed regarding their family functioning, mental health, self-esteem, global competence, and problem behaviors. Contrary to expectations about the influence of cancer on these families, adolescent cancer survivors reported lower levels of family cohesion than the normative sample of healthy adolescents and their families. While current age, gender, age at diagnosis, and time since treatment completion were generally not associated with adolescents' adjustment, perceived family cohesion and adaptability were strongly related to post-treatment psychological adjustment.

Long-term psychological adjustment of acute leukemia survivors: impact of bone marrow transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy.

As increasing numbers of patients survive acute leukemia, it has become important to study the long-term psychological and social adjustment of patients who have successfully completed their leukemia treatment. An important aspect of this inquiry is comparing the long-term psychosocial impact of two treatments for acute leukemia: chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. This study examines the psychosocial adjustment of 70 acute leukemia survivors who received either conventional chemotherapy alone (N = 49) or chemotherapy and an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (N = 21). At the time of assessment, patients were an average of 31 years old, had completed treatment 5 years ago and were physically healthy (mean Karnofsky score of 97). Psychometrically sound, self-report questionnaires assessed global and illness-specific psychological distress and social adjustment. Despite the additional strain and longer hospitalization associated with bone marrow transplantation, there was no difference found between BMT survivors and those treated with conventional chemotherapy alone in current psychological and social functioning. Both groups, however, had significantly greater levels of distress than that observed in normal physically healthy samples. The distress neither reached a psychiatric threshold nor significantly interfered with social adjustment. These data suggest that, irrespective of treatment, acute leukemia survivors experience overall psychological well-being and social adjustment even though they still carry a psychological burden that should be recognized in their continuing follow-up and care.