Endoscopic Septoplasty Versus Traditional Septoplasty for Treating Deviated Nasal Septum: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

IMPORTANCE: This is the first randomized study to compare the quality of life of patients undergoing endoscopic septoplasty compared to traditional trans-nasal trans-speculum (TNTS) septoplasty. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical outcomes and quality of life results of endoscopic versus TNTS septoplasty in patients with septal deviation and nasal obstruction. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing 2 approaches of septoplasty: endoscopic and TNTS septoplasty performed in a single institution during the years 2016 to2017. The follow-up time was 3 months. SETTING: A single institution study in a tertiary health-care referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent primary surgery for repairing deviated nasal septum due to nasal obstruction, were older than 18 years old, and were eligible for study inclusion. Sixty-five patients were enrolled in this study, 34 in the endoscopic arm and 31 in the TNTS septoplasty arm. The overall follow-up rate was 94% at the first visit (2 weeks) and 92% at the last visit (12 weeks). Thus, the final cohort consisted of 60 patients, 30 in each study arm. The patients ranged in age from 18 to 71 years (mean 27 years) old. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) score. Secondary outcomes were the Short Form 36 (SF36) QOL score and complication rates. Both questionnaires were administered at 2 weeks and 3 months following surgery. RESULTS: Sixty patients completed this study, 30 in each study arm. Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 scores were improved after 3 months, with no difference between the study arms. There were no cases of septal perforation or profound bleeding requiring repeated surgery. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Endoscopic septoplasty and TNTS show similar results for treatment of nasal septum deviation. Trial Registration: Traditional Septoplasty versus Endoscopic Septoplasty for Treating Deviated Nasal Septum, NCT02653950. https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0005ZOR&selectaction=Edit&uid=U00021YC&ts=2&cx=-2w7hot.

[Frontal sinus fractures: five years of treatment experience].

BACKGROUND: Frontal sinus fractures are commonly encountered in major trauma centers. They are almost exclusively seen in young adults and are usually caused by high velocity impacts. The intimate association of the frontal sinuses with structures such as frontal lobes and the eyes makes the appropriate management of this injury essential. PURPOSE: To review patients that suffered from frontal sinus fractures and underwent surgery, and to evaluate the efficacy and complications of this treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. The study population included all the patients that suffered from frontal sinus fracture and underwent a surgical intervention between the years 1998-2002. The data that was collected included demographic parameters, cause of injury, timing and kind of surgery, postoperative complications and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were operated on due to frontal sinus fractures during the years 1998-2002. Only 38 had adequate follow-up. Seventy percent of the patients suffered from bitable fractures. The other 30% had only anterior wall fractures. A total of 47% of the patients had additional facial fractures and 39% had intracranial injuries. Most of the patients were operated on during the first 24 hours (50%). The incidence of major postoperative complications was 2.5% (1 patient had meningitis). Minor complications occurred in 15% of the patients (mainly decreased forehead sensation). CONCLUSIONS: Frontal sinus fractures are commonly seen in major trauma centers. High index of suspicion, careful physical examination and imaging assistance are essential for accurate diagnosis. Lack of appropriate treatment can lead to serious intracranial complications. The surgical intervention achieves good cosmetic and functional outcomes in a majority of the patients.