Lung Oligometastasis of Breast Cancer: Prospective Cohort Study of Treatment Strategies (SBP-06).

While local treatment of metastases is considered to be unrelated to prognosis, previous studies have suggested that local treatment of isolated lung metastases may have positive prognostic impact. We designed this prospective cohort study to investigate the clinical situation and its outcomes. We enrolled patients with fewer than 3 lung nodules suspected of being oligometastases after curative breast cancer surgery. Treatments, including local and systemic therapy, were selected by the physician and patient in consultation. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes were the efficacy and the safety of the surgery for lung oligometastases. Between May 2015 and May 2019, 14 patients were enrolled. Resection of lung nodules (metastasectomy) was performed in 11 (78.6%) of 14 patients, and one of these cases was diagnosed as primary lung cancer. Metastasectomies were all performed employing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) without perioperative complications. Systemic therapies were administered to all patients except one. The respective 3-year and 5-year OS rates of patients with lung oligometastases were 91.6% and 81.5%, respectively. Progression occurred in 6 patients: 3 of the 10 with metastasectomy and all 3 without this surgical procedure. Lung metastasectomy was worthwhile as a diagnostic evaluation and may provide long-term benefit in some patients.

The impact of neoadjuvant systemic therapy on breast conservation rates in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: Surgical results from a phase II randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) induces tumor shrinkage and boosts the chance of breast-conserving thearpy (BCT) in patients with breast cancer. However, only a few trials have evaluated the effect of NST in conversion from BCT ineligibility to BCT eligibility in HER2-positive breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted the surgical sub-study of a phase II randomized trial, which compared standard neoadjuvant treatment or an experimental treatment modified according to the interim Ki-67 evaluation in women with stage II or III HER2-positive breast cancer. The treating surgeons assessed eligibility for BCT before and after NST. We evaluated the change in BCT eligibility following NST. We also analyzed the type of surgery performed and the success rate of BCT. RESULTS: Two hundred six patients were included in this study. Of these, 44.0% were considered BCT candidates at baseline, while 69.8% were deemed eligible for BCT after NST (P < 0.001). Among non-BCT candidates at baseline, 46% successfully converted to BCT candidates. Of 139 patients deemed eligible for BCT following NST, 84.2% attempted BCT, and successful BCT, defined as tumor-free at all surgical margins, was achieved in 96.8% of patients. Different treatment arms did not affect the rate of post-NST BCT eligibility (70.0% vs 69.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that NST resulted in an absolute increase of 25.8% in the rate of BCT eligibility in HER2-positive breast cancer. About a half of non-BCT candidates converted to BCT candidates. BCT was successful in most patients who attempted BCT. There were still patients who chose mastectomy even though they were deemed eligible for BCT. Patients considered BCT-ineligible due to large tumor size most likely converted to BCT-eligible with NST. On the other hand, NST had less impact on the surgical indication of patients with multicentric disease or probable poor cosmetic outcome.

Risk stratification for predicting symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) in breast cancer patients with bone metastases.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) affect many patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. However, predictive models of SSEs in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer have not been established for clinical use. The purpose of this study is to examine risk factors for SSEs in those patients and by combining these risk factors patients are classified into several groups. With this risk-stratification model, we can identify patients at higher risk of SSEs and require close follow-up to maintain ADL. METHODS: Participants included 189 female patients with bone metastases from breast cancer and treated in our institute between 2009 and 2012. To assess risk factors for the first SSEs, clinical data at the time of registration were assessed. To estimate the effects of covariates, we used cause-specific hazard modeling. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that a high number of metastasized vertebral bodies (≥20) (p < 0.001) and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (>5 ng/mL) (p = 0.003) were risk factors for SSEs. Patients were classified into four subgroups according to the combination of the number of vertebral metastases and CEA level: patients with CEA level > 5 ng/mL and ≥20 vertebral metastases; patients with CEA level ≤ 5 ng/mL and ≥20 vertebral metastases; patients with CEA level > 5 ng/mL and <20 vertebral metastases; and patients with CEA level ≤ 5 ng/mL and <20 vertebral metastases. Cumulative incidences of SSEs in these four subgroups at 6 months were 35.6%, 15.6%, 9.3%, and 3.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with elevated CEA level (>5 ng/mL) and extensive vertebral metastases (≥20) should be closely monitored in routine clinical care, to allow prevention of pathological fracture or paraplegia with the intervention of orthopedists or radiologists.

The incidence of atypical femoral fractures in breast cancer patients with bone metastases who received bisphosphonate treatment.

BACKGROUND: Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) have been reported to occur in patients with bone metastases who received long-term bisphosphonate treatment. However, the incidence of AFFs in breast cancer patients with bone metastases who received intravenous bisphosphonate is unclear. The purpose of this study is to examine the incidence of AFFs in breast cancer patients with bone metastases who received intravenous bisphosphonate. In addition, we estimated the number of dose and duration of intravenous bisphosphonate at the time of occurrence of AFFs. METHODS: We identified 356 female breast cancer patients with bone metastases who received intravenous bisphosphonate between November 2004 and October 2013 in our institution. The median number of doses of intravenous bisphosphonate was 18 (range, 1-103). The median duration of intravenous bisphosphonate treatment was 16 months (range, 1-102 months). We estimated the incidence of AFFs in patients who received intravenous bisphosphonate and used Poisson regression model to obtain the incidence rates of AFFs. RESULTS: Three AFFs in two patients were identified and the estimated incidence of AFFs was 2.99 per 1000 person-years. At the time of occurrence of AFFs, the patients had received 41 and 83 doses of intravenous bisphosphonate, for 37 and 79 months, respectively. The patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary nail. The frequency and incidence of AFFs in patients who received intravenous bisphosphonate for at least 41 or 83 doses or for more than 37 or 79 months were 2/60 (3.3%), 1/7 (14.3%), 2/70 (2.9%), and 1/9 (11.1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of AFFs is low in breast cancer patients with bone metastases who received intravenous bisphosphonate. Careful observation is warranted and radiography should be performed to investigate AFFs when clinical signs such as thigh pain appear. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical study.

[Efficacy and safety of aprepitant in patients with breast cancer].

We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of aprepitant in breast cancer patients who were treated with FEC(5- fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide)or EC(epirubicin, cyclophosphamide). We divided patients into two groups according to the aprepitant approval period. The rate of severe nausea(@Grade 2)was significantly less in patients with aprepitant(acute 10. 0%, delayed 15. 0%)than those without aprepitant(acute 29. 1%, delayed 30. 9%). Complete response( no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy)in the acute phase was significantly higher in the aprepitant pretreated group than in the no aprepitant group(82. 5% vs 61. 8%, respectively). Moreover, complete response in the delayed phase was also higher in the aprepitant group than in the no aprepitant group(82. 5%vs 58. 2%, respectively). Pre-treatment with aprepitant did not increase adverse events including constipation and elevation of alanine transaminase. The aprepitant was effective in terms of prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients treated with an anthracycline- based regimen.

[A case of recurrent breast cancer with extensive liver metastasis successfully treated with endocrine therapy].

A 5 6-year-old woman, who underwent breast-conserving surgery and radiation (60 Gy) therapy in July, 1992, at the age of 40, was diagnosed with pT1aN0M0, pStage I. She was administered tamoxifen (TAM) as adjuvant therapy. However, she underwent microdochectomy for DCIS in her contralateral breast in June, 1998. TAM was given till August, 1999. In June, 2006, at the age of 54, 14 years after initial surgery, CT revealed extensive liver masses which were diagnosed as liver metastasis by liver biopsy. Receptor status was positive for ER and PgR, and negative for HER2. AC was started as a first-line chemotherapy ( 4 courses), but did not prove effective. She refused second-line chemotherapy, so letrozole was selected, and subsequently resulted in PR of the liver metastasis. However, 8 months later, with a liver metastasis relapse, exemestane followed by tamoxifen, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and high-dose toremifene were administered sequentially, resulting in long-time disease control. In conclusion, endocrine therapy might be an effective option even in a visceral crisis, if metastatic tumors have showed slow growth and there is positive hormone receptor status.

Efficacy and tolerability of weekly paclitaxel in combination with high-dose toremifene citrate in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Toremifene citrate is expected to prevent drug resistance in cancer patients by inhibiting p-glycoprotein activity. The safety and efficacy of combination therapy with high-dose toremifene citrate and paclitaxel were investigated. Between December 2003 and June 2004, 15 women with a mean age of 53 years old with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. The administration schedule was 80 mg/m2 of paclitaxel given on Days 1, 8, and 15, and 120 mg/day of toremifene citrate orally administered starting on Day 18. On Days 32 and 39, paclitaxel was concurrently administered again. Toxicities, response rate, and time to treatment failure were assessed. All patients had been treated with endocrine or chemotherapy. Grade 3 leukopenia occurred in 2 patients on the administration of paclitaxel alone, and grade 3 febrile neutropenia occurred in 1 patient given the combination therapy. There was no grade 3 or greater non-hematological toxicity. There was no complete response and 1 partial response, producing a response rate of 6.7%. Median time to treatment failure was 2.7 months. Combination therapy of paclitaxel and toremifene was safe and well tolerated with minimal toxicity. Further clinical trials targeting patients with functional p-glycoprotein are warranted.

Identification of serum proteins related to adverse effects induced by docetaxel infusion from protein expression profiles of serum using SELDI ProteinChip system.

BACKGROUND: For the development of quick and easy methods for screening and identifying treatment-responsive proteins, we determined the protein expression profile of the serum after docetaxel infusion using a surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy (SELDI TOF-MS) system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood from breast cancer patients was collected before and 4, 8, 24 and 48 hours after docetaxel infusion. The protein expression profile was determined by a SELDI TOF-MS system. The relative expression levels of target proteins were compared during the time-course after docetaxel injection. RESULTS: We identified two representative proteins with molecular weights of 7790 Da and 9285 Da. The 7790 Da protein was high molecular weight kininogen, and the 9285 Da protein was apolipoprotein A-II. These two proteins had similar expression patterns in 5 patients, except one patient who experienced severe, acute, adverse effects. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that protein expression profiles determined by SELDI TOF-MS represent useful data for the identification of treatment-responsive proteins.

Systematic overview of quality of life studies for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The concept of quality of life (QOL) is essentially subjective, determined from the patient's point of view. Thus, an appropriate investigation and analysis of QOL as an indicator of medical treatment outcome is a task of some difficulty. The physician-led QOL assessment studies to date in Japan have suffered from insufficient knowledge and understanding of the diverse factors contributing to QOL, thereby contributing to a dearth of quality studies. Given this background, the Japanese Breast Cancer Society has established a Task Force for the development of guidelines to properly conduct QOL assessment studies. The present article reports the results of a large-scale systematic overview of QOL assessment studies for breast cancer patients that was undertaken as one part of this project. METHODS: Six databases were used in this overview: MEDLINE, CINAHL, CANCERLIT, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and Japan Centra Revuo Medicina. The search period was 1982-1999 for CINAHL, and 1990-1999 for the others. Following a check of the titles, important information was recorded on relevance and data collection forms. RESULTS: A systematic search was conducted of the literature on QOL assessment studies for breast cancer patients, and 1,954 articles were extracted from a check of titles. Using the relevance and data collection forms, the number of articles was further narrowed to 126. These articles were then classified according to the type and design of the study, the number of QOL and psychological measures used, frequency of use of each measure, and study focus and type of intervention. The results were then compiled. CONCLUSION: To date there have been almost no appropriate systematic overviews or guidelines issued for QOL assessment studies related to breast cancer, even on the international level. The results of the present study may contribute high-quality QOL information for evidence-based medicine, as it continues to gain global prevalence.