Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis: influence of concurrent aspirin administration on skin testing and provocation.

BACKGROUND: Provocation tests in patients with food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) are often negative, even after a sufficient quantity of the implicated food and exercise have been taken. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of aspirin in provocation tests and in skin prick testing (SPT) of patients with FDEIA. Gluten as a major allergen in wheat-dependent FDEIA was also investigated. METHODS: Provocation tests and SPT with suspected foods were performed in 12 patients with FDEIA. Provocation tests were performed with combinations of foods, exercise and aspirin. Detection of gluten-specific IgE was also performed by the CAP System FEIA radioallergosorbent test, SPT and a histamine release test. RESULTS: The SPT reaction was enhanced by pretreatment with oral aspirin in five of eight (62.5) patients. Aspirin facilitated provocation in five of seven (71%) patients tested. Ingestion of wheat and aspirin without exercise provoked symptoms in two patients. Aspirin provoked symptoms even with a small amount of wheat and exercise in one patient. Only the combination of aspirin, wheat and exercise provoked anaphylaxis in one patient. Specific IgE, SPT and/or the histamine release test with gluten were positive in nine of 11 patients with wheat-dependent FDEIA. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin enhances symptoms of FDEIA, and prior ingestion of aspirin under controlled conditions can be used to confirm FDEIA. In practice, such patients should avoid aspirin ingestion. Gluten appears to be the major allergen in these patients with wheat-dependent FDEIA.

The necessity for dual food intake to provoke food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FEIAn): a case report of FEIAn with simultaneous intake of wheat and umeboshi.

BACKGROUND: Food-dependent exercised-induced anaphylaxis (FEIAn) is classified among the physical allergies. Many different food allergens have been reported, but the pathophysiology of FEIAn remains unknown. Furthermore, provocation tests with a suspected food do not always succeed in patients with FEIAn. OBJECTIVE: We sought to clarify and investigate causative foods and mechanisms of FEIAn in a 14-year-old boy. In addition, we tested in vivo and in vitro effects of cromolyn sodium in the same patient. METHODS: We used open challenge tests for the provocation of FEIAn and measured changes in plasma histamine levels and FEV1. In addition, we investigated the mechanism of FEIAn in this case with in vitro histamine release testing. RESULTS: The patient was diagnosed as having FEIAn by provocation testing with a simultaneous intake of wheat and umeboshi, but not when each food was eaten singly, followed by exercise. In addition, his plasma histamine level increased transiently and forced expiratory volume 1, expressed as a percentage change from baseline, decreased significantly. A synergistic effect on in vitro histamine release testing with 2 kinds of the causative foods was shown. Administration of cromolyn sodium proved to be effective on both the in vitro and in vivo tests. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of FEIAn provoked by the test with a simultaneous intake of 2 kinds of food. This case might in part explain negative challenge test results in patients with FEIAn.

Digestibility of allergens extracted from natural rubber latex and vegetable foods.

BACKGROUND: Several cross-reactive allergens are now known to be involved in the defense responses of higher plants. Such proteins are drawing the attention of plant breeders because of their antimicrobial or stress-alleviating activities. Plants genetically modified to express defense-related proteins are being developed. The current concern is focused on the allergenicity of these intentionally expressed proteins. OBJECTIVE: It is believed that food allergens are proteins resistant to digestion. Digestibility tests have been accepted as an appropriate method for evaluating the allergenicity of newly introduced proteins. In this study we investigated the usefulness of this method for detecting allergens from natural rubber latex and vegetable foods. METHODS: Proteins were extracted from rubber latex, potato, and 5 kinds of fruits. Simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) were used for the digestibility test. An aliquot of each digest was periodically withdrawn and analyzed. Allergens were detected with pooled sera from individuals with latex allergy or patients given a diagnosis of oral allergy syndrome. RESULTS: Most latex and vegetable food proteins were digested by the SGF within 4 minutes. Numerous allergens were also decomposed by the SGF within 8 minutes. Although vegetable food allergens were relatively stable in the SIF, kiwi allergens were substantially degraded by the SIF within 16 hours. CONCLUSION: The pronounced lability of the plant-derived allergens was thought to reflect the discrete sensitization and elicitation processes of patients with latex-fruit syndrome or oral allergy syndrome. These results indicate that the allergenicity of a newly expressed protein should be carefully evaluated according to not only its digestibility but also other important properties.

[Usefulness of hypoallergenic rice (AFT-R 1) and analysis of the salt insoluble rice allergen molecule].

An involvement of rice allergy in development and exacerbation of recalcitrant atopic dermatitis (AD) has been suggested in some cases, and it has been also known that elimination diet of rice results in improvement of AD and reduction of the doses of steroid ointment and anti-allergic drugs used for the treatment. We prepared the hypoallergenic rice grain, AFT-R 1 (Allergen-free Technology Lab. Inc.-Rice 1), with alkali treatment from the rice material, Koshihikari, which is popular in Japan. Its usefulness was evaluated clinically and serologically. The serological study with IgE-ELISA showed that the major allergic protein were remarkably reduced to less than 1/6400 of them in the AFT-R 1. Then it was applied to the clinical trial, and evaluated as useful by the clinical effect in 14 (93%) out of 15 patients, who were diagnosed to have rice allergy by the elimination (in 15 case) and ingestion (in 12 cases) of the regular rice. The serum taken from the patient, whom the AFT-R 1 was evaluated as unuseful in the clinical trial, was shown to have IgE antibodies reactive to the remaining protein in AFT-R 1 by IgE-ELISA, and the 60 kd protein band was detected as an IgE-binding component of AFT-R 1 by IgE-immunoblotting with the same serum. This 60 kd rice protein was identified as ADP (UDP)-glucose-starch glycosyl transferase (EC: 2.4.1.21) by N-terminal amino acid analysis. These results indicated that AFT-R 1 is very useful as a substitute of rice in many AD patients with rice allergy, although IgE-binding component such as the 60 kd protein is remaining in one.