Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 101(Pt B): 108214, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34649116

RESUMO

SARS-CoV-2 infection can be a life-threatening disease. The optimal treatment of patients is not yet standardized. We use a serology-based therapeutic strategy based on the presence of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, in which patients with positive serology receive aggressive anti-inflammatory treatment with high-dose dexamethasone and/or tocilizumab and patients with negative serology receive early convalescent plasma therapy. We also analyze the immunological impact of this therapy in the recovery of T cells, B cells and NK cells during hospitalization in a COVID-19 infectious ward. Our results suggest that aggressive therapy with early administration of convalescent plasma and high-dose dexamethasone may be of benefit in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and might avoid progression of lung damage or need of admission in intensive care. This strategy did not impair immune responses against SARS-CoV-2, as 93% of the patients generated antibodies against the virus. Independently of previous immunological status of the patients, serology-guided therapy might benefit even patients with a high CIRS-G score, immunosuppressed or medically debilitated individuals and elderly patients. T cell disturbances were most frequent in patients who required high-dose dexamethasone, and B cell depletion was most frequent in patients who received tocilizumab. Early passive immunotherapy with convalescent plasma does not affect lymphoid recovery.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Linfócitos B/imunologia , COVID-19/sangue , COVID-19/imunologia , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imunização Passiva , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Células Matadoras Naturais/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Soroterapia para COVID-19
5.
Europace ; 22(7): 1062-1070, 2020 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32390046

RESUMO

AIMS: Patients with infective endocarditis (IE) frequently have cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Here, we aim to define the clinical profile and prognostic factors of IE in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Infective endocarditis cases were prospectively identified in the Spanish National Endocarditis Registry. From 3996 IE, 708 (17.7%) had a CIED and 424 CIED-related IE (lead vegetation). Patients with a CIED were older (68 ± 11 vs. 73 ± 8 years); had more comorbidities {pulmonary disease [176 (24.8%) vs. 545 (16.7%)], renal disease [239 (33.8%) vs. 740 (22.7%)], diabetes [248 (35.0%) vs. 867 (26.6%)], and heart failure [348 (49.2%) vs. 978 (29.9%)]}; and fewer complications {intracardiac destruction [106 (15%) vs. 1077 (33.1%)], heart failure [215 (30.3%) vs. 1340 (41.1%)], embolism [107 (15.1%) vs. 714 (21.9%)], and neurological involvement [77 (10.8%) vs. 702 (21.5%)]} (all P-values <0.001) in comparison to subjects without a CIED. In-hospital mortality was similar in patients with and without CIED [171 (24.2%) vs. 881 (27.0%), P = 0.82]. In subjects with a CIED, CIED-related IE was independently associated with in-hospital survival: odds ratio (OR) 0.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.7, P = 0.001]. Surgery was independently associated with in-hospital survival in CIED-related IE: OR 0.4 (95% CI 0.2-0.7, P = 0.004); but not in subjects with valve IE and no CIED lead involvement: OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.5-1.7, P = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Over a sixth of IE patients have a CIED. This group of patients is older, with more comorbidities and fewer IE-related complications in comparison to subjects without a CIED. In-hospital mortality was similar in patients with and without a CIED.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Marca-Passo Artificial , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Eletrônica , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Endocardite/epidemiologia , Endocardite/terapia , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocardite Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/terapia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/terapia , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...