RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Professionalism is believed to vary depending on factors such as era and culture. Therefore, clarifying the meaning of professionalism in each country, region, and workplace is essential. However, how professionalism is cultivated among dental students in Japanese schools has yet to be fully elucidated. Therefore, this study examined whether professionalism among Japanese dental students changes by year. This research will contribute to effective professional education. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: The participants included six fourth-year dental students and nine fifth-year dental students. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from November 2018 to January 2019, and verbatim transcripts were created from the recorded data. Based on these verbatim transcripts, thematic analysis was utilized to examine and identify professionalism components for each academic year. RESULTS: Three themes based on 14 constituent concepts were obtained for fourth-year students. Three themes based on 20 constituent concepts were obtained for fifth-year students. Fourth-year students primarily focused on technical aspects. In contrast, fifth-year students placed greater emphasis on attitude and communication skills. CONCLUSION: From fourth-year students, who primarily focus on classroom learning and practical training, to fifth-year students who gain clinical experience, the constituent elements of professionalism became more complex. However, this study did not examine other aspects of healthcare professionalism, such as interprofessional collaboration. A comprehensive education program tailored to the clinical setting is necessary for cultivating professionalism.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dental trainees have various clinical experiences during their internships and they grow by experiencing success and failure. When looking back on an event, it is not apparent which experiences result in more critical reflection. Therefore, we qualitatively analyzed the portfolios of dental trainees using Significant Event Analysis to investigate their depth of reflection. METHODS: We asked all Hiroshima University Hospital dental trainees who completed a 1-year training program between 2010 and 2016 to describe their most memorable event from the past year. We coded the text using a qualitative analysis method. Then, we classified the responses as positive or negative events. We evaluated the depth of reflection following a pragmatic approach to categorizing reflective material (Sandars method) and a reflective ability rubric and user guide (O'Sullivan method) and compared these results. The evaluation was performed separately by two researchers and a good rate of agreement was confirmed by the weighted kappa statistic. Comparison of the depth of reflection was performed by the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The assessments of the positive event group and negative event group were compared with the respective evaluation criteria of the Sandars and O'Sullivan methods, and reflection was found to be deeper in the negative event group. The Mann-Whitney U test revealed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the median values of the two groups for both methods. CONCLUSIONS: Both positive and negative experiences are important for dental practitioners to grow, but negative experiences are associated with critical reflections. In promoting the growth of training dentists, it is considered important to encourage deep reflections on positive experiences that are likely to be shallow.
