Relationship between ethnicity and sleep patterns in normal controls: implications for psychopathology and treatment.

The purpose of the study was to examine ethnic influences on sleep regulation. Seventy-three normal volunteers from four ethnic groups (17 African-Americans, 10 Asians, 30 Caucasians and 16 Hispanics) were studied for two consecutive nights with sleep polysomnography recordings in the laboratory. The subjects were in good physical and psychological health, and were asymptomatic with respect to sleep/wake complaints or sleep disorders. With the exception of minor differences, sleep continuity, sleep architecture and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep patterns were comparable among the four groups. African-Americans had evidence of more stages 1 and 2 and diminished stage 4 sleep, whereas the Hispanics had higher REM density. These preliminary findings suggest that sleep patterns are remarkably similar across cultures. There are, however, important cross-ethnic differences, specifically in the depth of sleep and in phasic REM measures. Because sleep disturbances are common symptoms of emotional disorders and since many psychoactive agents affect sleep, cross-ethnic differences in sleep patterns may have potential implications for the treatment and prevention of psychiatric disorders.

REM sleep in depression is influenced by ethnicity.

The influence of ethnicity on the manifestation of EEG sleep changes in depression was studied in 95 patients (21 African-Americans [AA], 17 Asians [AS], 37 Caucasians [C] and 20 Hispanics [H]) with unipolar major depression. Subjects were studied twice for 2 consecutive nights. On the second night of each 2-night session, placebo or scopolamine (1.5 microg/kg, IM, at 23.00 h) was administered. On the baseline (placebo) night, sleep architecture, sleep continuity and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep variables were generally comparable among the groups. However, REM sleep was less in AA and AS subjects than in C and H subjects. Furthermore, the distribution of REM sleep over the course of the night in AA and AS subjects differed significantly from that in the C and H groups. Although scopolamine significantly affected sleep continuity and REM sleep measures, no significant differential effects of scopolamine were observed. Because many antidepressants suppress REM sleep, the differences in baseline REM sleep observed might be related to the greater sensitivity of some ethnic-minority depressed patients to pharmacotherapy.

Cumulative sleepiness, mood disturbance, and psychomotor vigilance performance decrements during a week of sleep restricted to 4-5 hours per night.

To determine whether a cumulative sleep debt (in a range commonly experienced) would result in cumulative changes in measures of waking neurobehavioral alertness, 16 healthy young adults had their sleep restricted 33% below habitual sleep duration, to an average 4.98 hours per night [standard deviation (SD) = 0.57] for seven consecutive nights. Subjects slept in the laboratory, and sleep and waking were monitored by staff and actigraphy. Three times each day (1000, 1600, and 2200 hours) subjects were assessed for subjective sleepiness (SSS) and mood (POMS) and were evaluated on a brief performance battery that included psychomotor vigilance (PVT), probed memory (PRM), and serial-addition testing, Once each day they completed a series of visual analog scales (VAS) and reported sleepiness and somatic and cognitive/emotional problems. Sleep restriction resulted in statistically robust cumulative effects on waking functions. SSS ratings, subscale scores for fatigue, confusion, tension, and total mood disturbance from the POMS and VAS ratings of mental exhaustion and stress were evaluated across days of restricted sleep (p = 0.009 to p = 0.0001). PVT performance parameters, including the frequency and duration of lapses, were also significantly increased by restriction (p = 0.018 to p = 0.0001). Significant time-of-day effects were evident in SSS and PVT data, but time-of-day did not interact with the effects of sleep restriction across days. The temporal profiles of cumulative changes in neurobehavioral measures of alertness as a function of sleep restriction were generally consistent. Subjective changes tended to precede performance changes by 1 day, but overall changes in both classes of measure were greatest during the first 2 days (P1, P2) and last 2 days (P6, P7) of sleep restriction. Data from subsets of subjects also showed: 1) that significant decreases in the MSLT occurred during sleep restriction, 2) that the elevated sleepiness and performance deficits continued beyond day 7 of restriction, and 3) that recovery from these deficits appeared to require two full nights of sleep. The cumulative increase in performance lapses across days of sleep restriction correlated closely with MSLT results (r = -0.95) from an earlier comparable experiment by Carskadon and Dement (1). These findings suggest that cumulative nocturnal sleep debt had a dynamic and escalating analog in cumulative daytime sleepiness and that asymptotic or steady-state sleepiness was not achieved in response to sleep restriction.