Risk factors of acute renal failure in patients with protective ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite the potential benefits of protective ileostomy in rectal surgery, diverting loop ileostomy construction is not free of specific medical consequences implying unplanned hospital readmissions. The most common reason for readmission in these patients is a dehydration with a prevalence of acute renal failure (ARF) of 20%. The objective of this study was to establish the predictive factors of ARF in patients with protective ileostomy after surgery for rectal cancer from a bicentric study. METHODS: we conducted a bicentric retrospective cohort study to identify the risk factor of ARF. This study was carried out on 277 patients operated for rectal cancer with necessity of a protective ileostomy during the study period. ARF was measured at any endpoint between ileostomy creation and reversal. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 277 patients were included, and 18% (n = 50) were readmitted for ARF. In multivariate logistic regression, increased age (OR 1.02, p = 0.01), Psychiatric diseases (OR 4.33, p = 0.014), Angiotensin II receptor blockers (OR 5.15, p < 0.001) and the ASA score ≥ 3 (OR 9.5, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with ARF. CONCLUSION: Acute renal failure is a prevalent and significant event in the postoperative course of ileostomy patients. Patients at risk should be risk stratified before discharge and targeted for intensive preventive measures.

Applicability and outcome of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large tumours.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has been shown to be as safe and effective as conventional open surgery for small and benign adrenal lesions. With increasing experience with laparoscopic adrenalectomy, this approach has become the procedure of choice for the majority of patients requiring adrenalectomy. In our department, from 2011 to 2016, a total of 28 patients with 31 adrenal tumours underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy regardless of tumour size. Our policy in the department is to exclude adrenal tumours that are potentially malignant or metastatic adrenal tumours for laparoscopic resection. In this a retrospective study, we divided patients into two groups according to tumour size: < 5 or ≥ 5 cm, which was considered as the definition of large adrenal tumours. We compared demographic data and per- and postoperative outcomes. There was no statistical difference between the two groups for per-operative complications (16,6% vs 18,75% , P = 0.71), postoperative complications (16,6% vs 18,75% , P = 0.71), postoperative length of hospital stay (5 vs 8 days P = 0.40), mortality (0% vs 0%) or oncologic outcomes: recurrence and metastasis (8.3% vs 6.25% P = 0.70). The only statistical difference was the operating time, at a mean (SD) 194 (60) vs 237 (71) min (P = 0.039) and the conversion rate (0% vs 12.5% P < 0.01). Laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be done for all patients with adrenal tumours regardless of tumour size, even it needs more time for large tumour but appears to be safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons.