RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of lung perfusion imaging obtained with photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison with dual-source, dual-energy CT (DECT). METHODS: Seventy-one consecutive patients scanned with PCD-CT were compared to a paired population scanned with dual-energy on a 3rd-generation DS-CT scanner using (a) for DS-CT (Group 1): collimation: 64 × 0.6 × 2 mm; pitch: 0.55; (b) for PCD-CT (Group 2): collimation: 144 × 0.4 mm; pitch: 1.5; single-source acquisition. The injection protocol was similar in both groups with the reconstruction of perfusion images by subtraction of high- and low-energy virtual monoenergetic images. RESULTS: Compared to Group 1, Group 2 examinations showed: (a) a shorter duration of data acquisition (0.93 ± 0.1 s vs 3.98 ± 0.35 s; p < 0.0001); (b) a significantly lower dose-length-product (172.6 ± 55.14 vs 339.4 ± 75.64 mGy·cm; p < 0.0001); and (c) a higher level of objective noise (p < 0.0001) on mediastinal images. On perfusion images: (a) the mean level of attenuation did not differ (p = 0.05) with less subjective image noise in Group 2 (p = 0.049); (b) the distribution of scores of fissure visualization differed between the 2 groups (p < 0.0001) with a higher proportion of fissures sharply delineated in Group 2 (n = 60; 84.5% vs n = 26; 26.6%); (c) the rating of cardiac motion artifacts differed between the 2 groups (p < 0.0001) with a predominance of examinations rated with mild artifacts in Group 2 (n = 69; 97.2%) while the most Group 1 examinations showed moderate artifacts (n = 52; 73.2%). CONCLUSION: PCD-CT acquisitions provided similar morphologic image quality and superior perfusion imaging at lower radiation doses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The improvement in the overall quality of perfusion images at lower radiation doses opens the door for wider applications of lung perfusion imaging in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: The speed of data acquisition with PCD-CT accounts for mild motion artifacts. Sharply delineated fissures are depicted on PCD-CT perfusion images. High-quality perfusion imaging was obtained with a 52% dose reduction.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic approach of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) and energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two cohorts underwent CT angiographic examinations with EID-CT (Group 1; n = 158) and PCD-CT (Group 2; n = 172), (b) with two options in Group 1, dual energy (Group 1a) or single energy (Group 1b) and a single option in Group 2 (spectral imaging with single source). RESULTS: In Group 2, all patients benefited from spectral imaging, only accessible to 105 patients (66.5%) in Group 1, with a mean acquisition time significantly shorter (0.9 ± 0.1 s vs 4.0 ± 0 .3 s; p < 0.001) and mean values of CTDIvol and DLP reduced by 46.3% and 47.7%, respectively. Comparing the quality of 70 keV (Group 2) and averaged (Group 1a) images: (a) the mean attenuation within pulmonary arteries did not differ (p = 0.13); (b) the image noise was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in Group 2 with no difference in subjective image noise (p = 0.29); and (c) 89% of examinations were devoid of artifacts in Group 2 vs 28.6% in Group 1a. The percentage of diagnostic examinations was 95.2% (100/105; Group 1a), 100% (53/53; Group 1b), and 95.3% (164/172; Group 2). There were 4.8% (5/105; Group 1a) and 4.7% (8/172; Group 2) of non-diagnostic examinations, mainly due to the suboptimal quality of vascular opacification with the restoration of a diagnostic image quality on low-energy images. CONCLUSION: Compared to EID-CT, morphology and perfusion imaging were available in all patients scanned with PCD-CT, with the radiation dose reduced by 48%. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: PCD-CT enables scanning patients with the advantages of both spectral imaging, including high-quality morphologic imaging and lung perfusion for all patients, and fast scanning-a combination that is not simultaneously accessible with EID-CT while reducing the radiation dose by almost 50%.
