Computed tomography assessment of airways throughout bronchial tree demonstrates airway narrowing in severe asthma.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze airway dimensions throughout the bronchial tree in severe asthmatic patients using multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) focusing on airway narrowing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with severe asthma underwent automated (BronCare software) analysis of their right lung bronchi, with counts of airways >3 mm long arising from the main bronchi (airway count) and bronchial dimension quantification at segmental and subsegmental levels (lumen area [LA], wall area [WA], and WA%). Focal bronchial stenosis was defined as >50% narrowing of maximal LA on contiguous cross-sectional slices. Severe asthmatics were compared to 13 nonsevere asthmatic patients and nonasthmatic (pooled) subjects (Wilcoxon rank tests, then stepwise logistic regression). Finally, cluster analysis of severe asthmatic patients and stepwise logistic regression identified specific imaging subgroups. RESULTS: The most significant differences between severe asthmatic patients and the pooled subjects were bronchial stenosis (subsegmental and all bronchi: P < .002) and WA% (P < .0003). Stepwise logistic regression retained WA% as the only explanatory covariable (P = .002). Two identified clusters of severe asthmatic patients differed for parameters characterizing airway narrowing (airway count: P = .0002; focal bronchial stenosis: P = .009). Airway count was as discriminant as forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (P = .01) to identify patients in each cluster, with both variables being correlated (r = 0.59, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Severe asthma-associated morphologic changes were characterized by focal bronchial stenoses and diffuse airway narrowing; the latter was associated with airflow obstruction. WA%, dependent on airway caliber, is the best parameter to identify severe asthmatic patients from pooled subjects.

Relationship between the airway wall area and asthma control score in moderate persistent asthma.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between airway wall area and clinical asthma control, assessed by the Asthma Control Test (ACT). METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated 96 adults for asthma control ["at least well controlled" (ACT ≥ 20; n = 52) or "not well controlled" (ACT < 20; n = 44) and airway dimensions: luminal area (LA), wall area (WA) and WA%], obtained using automated dedicated software measurements from volumetric CT images. Results were analysed for segmental bronchi, subsegmental bronchi in the right upper lobe and basilar segments, both uncorrected and corrected for body surface area (BSA). RESULTS: For all bronchi corrected for BSA, there was no correlation between airway wall area and ACT score. There was a weak but statistically significant correlation between uncorrected WA and ACT score (r = -0.203; P = 0.047); WA values were numerically higher in the "not well-controlled" versus the "at least well-controlled asthma" subgroups. For sub-segmental bronchi, there was a correlation between the ACT score and both WA/BSA (r = -0.204; P = 0.047) and WA (r = -0.249; P = 0.014), and for upper lobe bronchi, between the ACT score and WA (r = -0.207; P = 0.044). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a correlation between subsegmental bronchial airway measurements and clinical control of asthma; this is probably a reflection of airway remodelling and structural changes in chronic poorly controlled asthma. KEY POINTS: • Volumetric computed tomography offers new insights into bronchial morphology. • The relationship between current asthma control and airway wall abnormalities is assessed. • Some relationships between airway wall area and clinical control were demonstrated. • We observed less shape variation of bronchi in "not well-controlled" asthma patients.