Relationship between exercise test recovery indices and psychological and quality-of-life status in hemodialysis patients: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to correlate the psychological and health-related quality-of-life status of hemodialysis (HD) patients with recovery indices following maximal and submaximal exercise tests. METHODS: Twenty patients on HD (aged 53.5 ± 12.9 years) and 18 healthy individuals (aged 54.1 ± 10.2 years) underwent a maximal and a submaximal cardiopulmonary test (CPETmax and CPETsubmax). Heart rate recovery (HRrec) 1 minute after exercise and time for VO2 to decrease by half (T1/2VO2) were determined. All subjects also completed 3 questionnaires: (a) the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), (b) Quality of Life Index (QLI)-Spitzer Index and (c) SF-36 physical and mental component summary scales. RESULTS: HRrec after maximal (p=0.029) and submaximal test (p=0.041) was found to be lower in patients compared with healthy individuals. T1/2VO2 was raised by 29% (p=0.003) in patients compared with controls. Moreover, a significantly higher BDI (by 133.7%), lower SF-36 physical (by 47.8%) and mental (by 42.9%) component summary score and lower QLI (by 32.1%) results were found in HD patients compared with controls. BDI (p=0.045), QLI (P=0.011), SF-36 physical (p=0.017) and mental component scales (p=0.021) were independently associated with HRrec in maximal tests in patients. Similar correlations remained for submaximal tests among HRrec and BDI (p=0.004), QLI (p=0.006), SF-36 physical (p=0.048) but not mental scales (p=0.369) in the patients' group. T1/2VO2 also correlated to BDI (p=0.019), QLI (p=0.005) and SF-36 mental scale (p=0.017) in maximal tests in these patients. In contrast, there was a correlation between HRrec and BDI (p=0.004) in the control group for maximal tests only. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in HD patients, recovery indices following maximal and submaximal exercise tests were shown to provide useful indications of the patients' psychological and quality-of-life profiles.

Effects of intradialytic exercise training on health-related quality of life indices in haemodialysis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of intradialytic exercise training on health-related quality of life indices in haemodialysis patients. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Thirty-five patients on haemodialysis, with a mean (SD) age of 48.8 (13.9) years, volunteered to participate in the study. They were randomized either to rehabilitation group (group A: 19 patients), following a 10-month intradialytic exercise training programme or to control group (group B: 14 patients). After the randomization, two of the patients, one of each group, withdrew from the study for reasons unrelated to exercise training. METHOD: All patients at the beginning and the end of the study underwent clinical examination, laboratory tests and a treadmill exercise testing with spiroergometric study for the evaluation of their aerobic capacity (Vo(2peak)). A formal psychosocial assessment, which included affective (Beck Depression Inventory), health-related quality of life (Quality of Life Index, Living Questionnaire of Minnesota, Life Satisfaction Index and Short Form-36 questionnaire) and personality (Eysenck Personality Questionnaire) parameters, was evaluated at beginning and end of the study. The dose of erythropoietin was changed as needed, according to the level of the haemoglobin, aiming to keep it at 11 (2) g/dL during the study. RESULTS: Baseline values were similar between the two groups. After training in group A, Vo(2peak) was increased by 21.1% (P<0.05) and exercise time by 23.6% (P<0.05). Moreover, group A showed a decrease in self-reported depression (Beck Depression Index) of 39.4% (P<0.001). In addition, trained patients demonstrated a significant improvement in Quality of Life Index (from 6.5 (1.8) to 9.0 (1.3), P<0.001) and Life Satisfaction Index (from 44.8 (8.6) to 53.0 (5.6), P<0.001), and an increase in the Physical Component Scale of the SF-36 (from 40.5 (5.6) to 44.5 (5.5), P<0.05), while the Mental Component Scale remained unchanged. Multiple regression analysis indicated that the improvement in quality of life depended on the participation in exercise programmes, the effects of training and the reduction in the level of depression. No changes were observed in Eysenck Personality Questionnaire by the end of the study, while all the above parameters remained almost unchanged in the controls. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that intradialytic exercise training improves both physical functioning and psychological status in haemodialysis patients, leading to an improvement of patients' quality of life.