Rigid Ring Versus Flexible Band for Tricuspid Valve Repair in Patients Scheduled for Mitral Valve Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Study.

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid valve repair for functional regurgitation is effectively performed with different annuloplasty devices. However, it remains unclear whether there are advantages associated with rigid rings compared to flexible bands. This prospective randomised study aimed to compare results of using a flexible band ring versus a rigid ring for functional tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. METHODS: A single-centre randomised study was designed to allocate patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation undergoing mitral valve surgery to be treated with a flexible band or rigid ring. These patients were analysed by echocardiographic follow-up. The primary outcome was freedom from recurrent tricuspid regurgitation at 12-months follow-up. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, survival, freedom from tricuspid valve reoperation, right ventricular reverse remodelling, and rate of major adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were allocated to receive concomitant tricuspid valve annuloplasty with the flexible band or rigid ring. There was no between-group difference in freedom from recurrent tricuspid regurgitation: 97.3% in Rigid group (95% CI, 93.0-98.8) and 96.2% in the Flexible group (95% CI, 92.0-98.5) at 12-months follow-up (log-rank, p=0.261). Early mortality, survival, freedom from tricuspid valve reoperation, and global right ventricle systolic function were also comparable in both groups of patients. However, the flexible band had advantage in restoring regional right ventricle function (Doppler-derived systolic velocities of the annulus [S], tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion) at 12-months follow-up. CONCLUSION: Both the rigid ring and flexible band offered acceptable outcomes for functional tricuspid regurgitation correction without significant differences, as assessed at 12-months follow-up.

Surgical Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With and Without Left Atrium Reduction for Patients Scheduled for Mitral Valve Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Study.

BACKGROUND: The influence of left atrium (LA) enlargement on atrial arrhythmia recurrence (AAR) after surgical ablation in patients with mitral valve (MV) disease remains unresolved. OBJECTIVE: Left atrial size is critical to the success of concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients scheduled for MV surgery. However, a large LA should not be a limiting factor when evaluating surgical candidates with AF if they receive appropriate treatment during concomitant ablation. This randomised study assessed whether adding LA reduction (LAR) to the maze procedure for MV surgery patients can improve freedom from AAR. METHODS: From September 2014 to September 2017, 140 patients were randomly assigned into two groups. The maze group underwent MV surgery with concomitant surgical AF ablation (n=70). The maze + LA reduction group underwent MV surgery with concomitant AF ablation and LA reduction procedure (n=70). Rhythm outcomes were estimated by Holter monitoring, according to Heart Rhythm Society guidelines. RESULTS: The concomitant LA reduction procedure did not increase early mortality and complications rates. Significant differences in freedom from AAR were observed at 24 months (maze, 78.4%; maze + LAR group, 92.3%; p=0.025). A significant difference in LA volume was detected at discharge (p<0.0001); however, it was not significantly different at 24 months (p=0.182). CONCLUSIONS: Adding LA reduction to the maze procedure led to improvements in freedom from AAR for patients with AF and LA enlargement scheduled for MV surgery. A concomitant LA reduction procedure did not increase mortality and perioperative risk.

Single-Centre Experience of Surgical Myectomy for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Septal myectomy is the gold standard treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. This study aimed to evaluate the results from patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who had undergone septal myectomy. METHODS: Data were analysed that has been prospectively collected over 7 years from 345 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who underwent septal myectomy at Meshalkin National Medical Research Center. RESULTS: Six (6) patients (1.7%) died within 30 days of surgery. The mean (standard deviation, SD) resting left ventricular outflow tract gradients reduced from 83.4 (24.2) mmHg preoperatively to 16.2 (8.5) mmHg at discharge (p < 0.001). Of the 345 patients, 329 (95.4%) attended the most recent follow-up assessments, and of these, 254 (77.2%) were categorised as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I, 64 (19.5%) class II, and 11 (3.3%) class III. The mean overall long-term survival rate after septal myectomy was 95.7% (SD 1.7%) (95% CI, 90.0-97.9). This did not differ from the age-matched and gender-matched general population (log-rank, p = 0.109). At the last follow-up assessments, six of 67 patients who had undergone concomitant Cox-Maze IV procedures had late atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences. A preoperative short-axis view of left atrial diameter of 57.5 mm (hazard ratio, 1.30 (95% CI, 1.03-1.65), p < 0.001) predicted late atrial tachyarrhythmias (p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: At this hypertrophic cardiomyopathy centre, septal myectomy is associated with low operative and early mortality rates (<2%), a low risk of early adverse events, and acceptable intermediate-term clinical and haemodynamic results.

A left atrial versus a biatrial lesion set for persistent atrial fibrillation ablation during open heart surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of left atrial ablation and biatrial (BA) ablation in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing open heart surgery. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2016, 588 consecutive patients with either persistent (20.9%) or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (79.1%) were enrolled in this study. To reduce between-group differences, propensity score-matched groups (156 patients/group) were obtained, with similar preoperative and perioperative characteristics. RESULTS: The propensity score-matched left atrial and BA groups did not differ regarding 30-day mortality (1.9% vs 0.6%; P = 0.617), 5-year overall survival (93.5 ± 2.2% vs 92.8 ± 2.9%, P = 0.998) or survival free from thromboembolic events (97.1 ± 2.8% vs 96.2 ± 2.7%, P = 0.309). The BA lesion set was more beneficial in terms of freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence (85.3 ± 4.5% vs 91.9 ± 3.1%, P = 0.049; hazard ratio 3.26; 95% confidence interval 1.33-7.99), but it was associated with higher pacemaker implantation rate (3.8% vs 17.3%; P < 0.001) due to sinus node dysfunction. There was no significant between-group difference regarding the incidence of atrioventricular conduction disturbances (3.2% vs 7.0%, respectively; P = 0.211). CONCLUSIONS: The 2 lesion sets (left atrial and BA) are associated with similar 30-day mortality, survival rates, incidences of embolic events and atrioventricular conduction disturbances. In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, concomitant surgical ablation with BA lesion set provided better freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence, but BA ablation was associated with a higher incidence of sinus node dysfunction and a higher rate of pacemaker implantation.