The relationship between youth involvement, alliance and outcome in trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Research suggests that combining the trauma-specific elements with a strong alliance helps optimize treatment outcomes in Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) for youth. Building on this, we investigate whether more positive and less negative involvement behaviors during trauma narration are associated with a stronger alliance and predict fewer posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). METHOD: Participants were 65 youth (M age = 15.5, SD = 2.2; 77% girls) receiving TF-CBT. Both youth self-report (Child PTSD Symptom Scale and Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Children) and observer ratings (Client Involvement Rating Scale) were used, and relationships were investigated with correlations and regression analyses. RESULTS: The positive involvement behaviors demonstration of treatment understanding and self-disclosure predicted fewer PTSS but were not associated with the alliance - while initiation of discussions and showing enthusiasm predicted more PTSS but were associated with a stronger alliance. The negative involvement behaviors passivity and avoidance did not predict PTSS but were negatively associated with the alliance. CONCLUSION: The relationships between traumatized youths' positive and negative involvement behaviors, alliance and PTSS outcomes appear mixed. The combination of a clear understanding of why processing the trauma can be helpful, more trauma-related self-disclosure and a stronger alliance seem favorable for alleviating PTSS.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00635752..

Four perspectives on traumatized youths' therapeutic alliance: Correspondence and outcome predictions.

OBJECTIVE: Does the rater-perspective of youths' therapeutic alliance matter? To answer this, we evaluated the relationships between four perspectives of youths' alliance, then, we examined whether each perspective and potential discordance between the perspectives predicted outcomes. METHOD: Participants were 65 youth (M age = 15.11, SD = 2.14; 76.9% girls) undergoing trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) and their therapists (n = 24). Youths' alliance was rated by youth, therapists and parents using the Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Children-revised and by observers using the Therapy Process Observational Coding System-Alliance scale. Posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) were assessed with the Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS) and the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for Children and Adolescents (CAPS-CA). RESULTS: The alliance ratings by youth-parent, parent-therapist, and therapist-observer significantly correlated. Only a higher youth-rated alliance significantly predicted fewer PTSS. Furthermore, a higher therapist-rated than youth-rated alliance significantly predicted higher scores on CPSS and CAPS-CA, and a higher parent-rated than youth-rated alliance predicted significantly higher CPSS score. CONCLUSION: Therapists should explicitly check in with youth clients about the alliance; because only youths' evaluation of their alliance predicted the outcome and an overestimation of their alliance by therapists and parents predicted more PTSS.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00635752..

Therapists' behaviors and youths' therapeutic alliance during trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) is a recommended treatment for posttraumatic stress (PTS) in youth, and a strong therapeutic alliance predicts reductions of PTS in TF-CBT. However, little is known of how therapists can build a strong alliance. This study seeks to understand which therapist behaviors are associated with the strength of alliance in TF-CBT. METHOD: Participants were 65 youth (M age = 15.1, SD = 2.19; 77% girls) engaged in TF-CBT and their therapists (n = 24). The alliance was assessed midtreatment using the Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Children-revised. Therapists' behaviors were coded using the Adolescent Alliance-Building Scale-revised, and youth engagement behavior was coded using the Behavioral Index of Disengagement Scale. Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate clients' and therapists' in-session behaviors as predictors of the alliance, in addition to assessing the potential moderating effects of youth behaviors. RESULTS: Rapport-building behaviors were significantly predictive of higher alliance scores (Est. = 1.81, 95% CI [0.11, 3.52], p = .038), whereas there was no predictive effect of treatment socialization or trauma-focusing behavior on alliance scores. Initial youth behavior significantly moderated the effect of trauma-focusing on the alliance (p = .007); greater focus on trauma was associated with higher alliance scores among passively disengaged youth (Est. = 4.92, 95% CI [1.80, 8.05], p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Rapport-building behaviors are associated with a stronger alliance in TF-CBT. Gradual exposure through initial trauma-eliciting does not appear to undermine alliance formation but is rather associated with higher alliance-scores among passively disengaged youth. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).