Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Subst Abuse Treat ; 112: 29-35, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32199543

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the narrowing gender gap in the prevalence of substance use disorders, women continue to be vastly underrepresented in substance use services. Relational factors, family responsibilities, mental health, and stigma may present unique barriers encountered by women. AIMS: The aims of this study were to examine: (1) gender differences in substance use treatment barriers, (2) gender differences in perceptions of stigmatization for seeking substance use treatment, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and trauma-related stress, and (3) whether perceived stigmatization and mental health symptoms are associated with greater barriers among women. METHODS: One hundred adults (50% self-identified women) from a substance use and concurrent disorders program in Ontario, Canada, completed a questionnaire package containing measures of sociodemographic information, substance use, mental health, perceived stigma, and substance use treatment barriers. RESULTS: Women reported more barriers related to family responsibilities, relational factors, and mental health (p < .01), and higher levels of perceived stigma (p < .01) compared to men. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study contribute to our understanding of treatment barriers and perceived stigmatization among women. This knowledge may be used to aid in the development and delivery of accessible, gender-responsive services that address these barriers and challenge the stigma attached to substance use among women.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Ontário , Fatores Sexuais
2.
J Addict Med ; 14(2): 163-171, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31403977

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Problematic alcohol use accounts for a large proportion of Emergency Department (ED) visits and revisits. We developed the Alcohol Medical Intervention Clinic (AMIC), a Rapid Access Addiction Medicine (RAAM) service, to reduce alcohol-related ED re-utilization and improve care for individuals with alcohol problems. This article describes the AMIC model and reports on an evaluation of its impact on patients and the ED system. METHODS: Individuals presenting to The Ottawa Hospital Emergency Departments (TOH-ED) for an alcohol-related issue were referred to AMIC. Using data collected via medical chart review, and also self-report questionnaires, we assessed ED visits, revisits, and changes in alcohol use and mental health symptoms in patients before and after receiving services in AMIC. The incidence of alcohol-related ED visits and re-visits from 12-month periods before and after the introduction of AMIC were compared using data from TOH Data Warehouse. Connections made to additional services and patient satisfaction was also assessed. RESULTS: For patients served by AMIC, from May 26, 2016 to June 30, 2017 (n = 194), there was an 82% reduction in 30-day visits and re-visits (P < 0.001). An 8.1% reduction in total alcohol-related 30-day TOH-ED revisit rates and a 10% reduction in total alcohol-related TOH-ED visits were found. After receiving AMIC services, clients reported reductions in alcohol use, depression, and anxiety (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AMIC demonstrated positive impacts on patients and the healthcare system. AMIC reduced ED utilization, connected people with community services, and built system capacity to serve people with alcohol problems.


Assuntos
Medicina do Vício/métodos , Medicina do Vício/organização & administração , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Álcool/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Alcoolismo/terapia , Ansiedade/terapia , Depressão/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Encaminhamento e Consulta
3.
J Couns Psychol ; 63(2): 173-182, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26651210

RESUMO

Although integrating progress monitoring (PM) measures into psychotherapy practice can provide numerous benefits, including improved client outcomes, relatively few clinicians use these measures (e.g., Ionita & Fitzpatrick, 2014). To better understand the reasons for clinicians' reluctance, consensual qualitative research methodology was used to examine the challenges faced by clinicians currently using PM measures. Open-ended, semistructured interviews, with 25 clinicians who chose to use PM measures, revealed that clinicians tended to face challenges involving technical concerns, negative responses from others, and personal barriers such as anxiety. The majority of participants discussed ways to overcome the challenges they experienced, including ensuring the fit of the PM measure, explaining measures to others to help engender a positive response, adapting their own perspective, and increasing their own and others' knowledge of the measures. Implications for practicing psychologists and for knowledge translation efforts are discussed.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Psicoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psicoterapia/métodos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...