Factors Influencing Primary Care Career Choice: A Multi-Institutional Cross-sectional Survey of Internal Medicine Primary Care Residency Graduates.

BACKGROUND: Although primary care is associated with population health benefits, the supply of primary care physicians continues to decline. Internal medicine (IM) primary care residency programs have produced graduates that pursue primary care; however, it is uncertain what characteristics and training factors most affect primary care career choice. OBJECTIVE: To assess factors that influenced IM primary care residents to pursue a career in primary care versus a non-primary care career. DESIGN: Multi-institutional cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: IM primary care residency graduates from seven residency programs from 2014 to 2019. MAIN MEASURES: Descriptive analyses of respondent characteristics, residency training experiences, and graduate outcomes were performed. Bivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between primary care career choice with both graduate characteristics and training experiences. KEY RESULTS: There were 256/314 (82%) residents completing the survey. Sixty-six percent of respondents (n = 169) practiced primary care or primary care with a specialized focus such as geriatrics, HIV primary care, or women's health. Respondents who pursued a primary care career were more likely to report the following as positive influences on their career choice: resident continuity clinic experience, nature of the PCP-patient relationship, ability to care for a broad spectrum of patient pathology, breadth of knowledge and skills, relationship with primary care mentors during residency training, relationship with fellow primary care residents during training, and lifestyle/work hours (all p < 0.05). Respondents who did not pursue a primary care career were more likely to agree that the following factors detracted them from a primary care career: excessive administrative burden, demanding clinical work, and concern about burnout in a primary care career (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to optimize the outpatient continuity clinic experience for residents, cultivate a supportive learning community of primary care mentors and residents, and decrease administrative burden in primary care may promote primary care career choice.

Telehealth Attitudes, Training, and Preparedness Among First-Year Internal Medicine Residents in the COVID-19 Era.

Introduction: Telehealth, especially the use of real-time video and phone visits in ambulatory care, is increasingly important in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The current state of internal medicine (IM) interns' telehealth training at the start of residency is unknown. Objective: To characterize the attitudes, training, and preparedness of IM interns regarding the use of telehealth video and phone visits in ambulatory care. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of IM interns at four IM residency programs in the United States in 2020. Results: One hundred fifty-six surveys were analyzed (response rate 82%). Seventy-five percent of interns rated training in the use of real-time video and phone visits for ambulatory care as important or very important. The vast majority received no training (74%) or clinical experience (90% no prior video visits, 81% no prior phone visits) during medical school. More interns believed that primary care may be effectively delivered via video visits compared with phone visits (77% vs. 35%). Most interns (69%) missed clinical time during medical school due to the COVID-19 pandemic; 41% felt that the pandemic negatively affected their ambulatory care preparation. Overall, the majority of interns (58%) felt prepared for primary care; only 12% felt prepared to deliver primary care using either video or phone visits. Conclusions: Although IM interns had favorable attitudes toward video and phone visits, few had training or clinical experience; most felt unprepared. Residency programs may need to close training gaps for current interns in conducting telehealth video and phone visits.

Time for Clinic: Fourth-Year Primary Care Exposure and Clinic Preparedness Among Internal Medicine Interns.

BACKGROUND: Internal medicine (IM) residency graduates consistently report being less prepared for outpatient practice than inpatient medicine. Although an initial study suggested interns arriving for IM residency reported low levels of preparedness for continuity clinic, the impact of education and experience during the undergraduate medical education to graduate medical education transition on ambulatory training is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To describe end of medical school primary care exposure among entering IM interns and its association with self-assessed preparedness for residency continuity clinic. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of 161 entering IM interns in 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Entering interns at four geographically diverse IM residency programs (University of Chicago, University of North Carolina, University of Pennsylvania, and University of Washington), representing 81 US medical schools. RESULTS: A total of 139 interns (86%) responded to the survey. Surveyed interns reported a median of zero days of general internal medicine (GIM) clinic (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-20 days) and 2.5 days of multispecialty adult primary care (IQR: 0-26.5 days) during fourth year of medical school. The median last exposure to primary care was 13 months prior to internship (IQR: 7-18 months). Interns who rated themselves as prepared for primary care clinic reported a median of twenty more multispecialty adult primary care days (20 vs. 0 days; p < 0.01) and fourteen more GIM clinic days (14 vs. 0 days; p < 0.01) than their unprepared counterparts. The experiences were also more recent, with six fewer months between their last multispecialty adult primary care exposure and the start of internship (9 vs. 15 months; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of incoming IM interns had no primary care training during the fourth year of medical school. At the start of residency, IM interns who felt more prepared for their primary care clinic reported more recent and more numerous primary care experiences.

Improving Ambulatory Training in Internal Medicine: X + Y (or Why Not?).

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirement that internal medicine residents spend one-third of their training in an ambulatory setting has resulted in programmatic innovation across the country. The traditional weekly half-day clinic model has lost ground to the block or "X + Y" clinic model, which has gained in popularity for many reasons. Several disadvantages of the block model have been reported, however, and residency programs are caught between the threat of old and new challenges. We offer the perspectives of three large residency programs (University of Washington, Emory University, and Massachusetts General Hospital) that have successfully navigated scheduling challenges in our individual settings without implementing the block model. By sharing our innovative non-block models, we hope to demonstrate that programs can and should create the solution that fits their individual needs.

Care of women veterans.

As more women have joined the US military, there has been a shift in the overall veteran population. Those who served in the US military, especially women, have undergone experiences that will impact their overall health and wellbeing. It is therefore critical for providers to better understand US military culture and be prepared on how to ask patients about their military experience. Health care providers need to be aware of the unique medical, psychiatric, and psychosocial needs of women veterans in order to best serve this patient population.

Dyspepsia.

Dyspepsia is a complex disorder with several distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms that are still poorly understood. Patients who experience dyspepsia have a high burden of disease, with significant personal and economic costs. Although serious pathology presenting as dyspepsia is rare, clinicians need to be aware of alarm features that should trigger prompt referral for subspecialty care. Those without alarm features can be managed in a rational way with either empiric antisecretory therapy, test-and-treat for H pylori eradication, antidepressants, and psychotherapy, or a combination of these. Given the heterogeneity of symptoms and large variability in response to different treatments, more research into specific pathophysiologic mechanisms will likely help guide diagnosis and treatment choices in the future.