Influence of Bimaxillary Surgery on Pharyngeal Airway in Class III Deformities and Effect on Sleep Apnea: A STOP-BANG Questionnaire and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate pharyngeal airway space (PAS; nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and total airway) volume and the correlation of an obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and hypopnea syndrome screening questionnaire (STOP-BANG) with various mandibular setbacks during bimaxillary surgery and compare these findings with an age- and gender-matched skeletal Class I control group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was composed of patients with skeletal Class III discrepancy who underwent bimaxillary jaw surgery and were assessed with STOP-BANG score, cephalometry, and cone-beam computed tomography (of the PAS). The predictor variable was bimaxillary jaw surgery and included 4-, 6-, and 8-mm setbacks. The primary outcome variables were PAS volume, body mass index, and STOP-BANG score evaluated at 1 week before surgery and after comprehensive orthodontic treatment (11.25 ± 1.95 months). Other variables were grouped into the following categories: demographic and cephalometric parameters. Statistical intragroup and intergroup differences were assessed by paired t and independent t tests (P < .05), respectively. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 48 patients (18 to 25 yr old); group I received 4-mm setback (n = 16), group II received 6-mm setback (n = 16), and group III received 8-mm setback (n = 16) mandibular surgery, and all test groups received 4-mm maxillary advancement. The entire study group was compared with a skeletal Class I control group (n = 16). The total PAS volume after orthodontic treatment in groups I and II showed a significant decrease compared with the presurgical PAS (P < .001), but the decrease was not less than that in the control group (P > .05). In contrast, the total PAS volume in group III after orthodontic treatment (23,574 ± 1,394 mm3) was less than that in the control group (23,884 ± 1,543 mm3). CONCLUSION: After surgery, patients with Class III discrepancy exhibited a decrease in oropharynx volume; however, the STOP-BANG score showed no change in risk factors scores for OSA at 4- to 8-mm setback surgery of the mandible in bimaxillary jaw surgery.

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: which is better?

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) and mandibular distraction ostoegenesis (MDO) have both been applied in the surgical treatment of Class II mandibular hypoplasia. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the stability and morbidities of both techniques. From the preliminary data, skeletal relapse seems to be comparable between BSSO and MDO within the first post-operative six months. Objective and subjective neurosensory evaluation showed no significant difference in all mean scores for LT, 2PD and PPPT between both surgical techniques. Localized wound infection was a common post-operative complication for MDO. A greater sample size is required to ascertain which technique is better.