Patient-Perceived Recovery and Outcomes after Bipolar Radiofrequency Controlled Ablation with Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Refractory Plantar Fasciosis.

Previous studies have documented persistent postoperative symptoms and limitations following plantar fasciotomy using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The incomplete recovery (resolution) has been theorized to occur from altered foot biomechanics, and alternative treatment methods have continued to gained popularity for addressing refractory plantar fasciosis (RPF). The purpose of the present study was to assess patient-perceived recovery (PPR) and outcomes after bipolar radiofrequency controlled ablation (BRC) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection for RPF. From July 2006 to July 2016, 43 patients (52 procedures) were enrolled. PROMS were prospectively obtained and compared between patients who perceived themselves as recovered without/residual deficits (recovered-resolved, recovered-not resolved) and those not recovered. Holistic satisfaction, procedure-specific satisfaction, complications, reoperations, and failure were recorded. Overall, 67.4% perceived themselves as recovered-resolved, 23.3% as recovered-not resolved, and 9.3% as not recovered. Holistic and procedure specific satisfaction were high (90.7% and 88.4%), with a mean modified Foot Function Index of 11.65, visual analog scale for pain 1.5, and failure rate of 9.3% at a median of 53 months (interquartile range 33 to 83). In the present study, outcomes with BRC with PRP injection compared favorably to the long-term outcomes reported for partial and complete plantar fasciotomy. Although 14 patients (32.6%) continued to have some postoperative symptoms, 71% indicated that they were satisfied with their symptoms, and 64% would undergo a similar procedure again. Therefore, despite the study's shortcomings, a patient's ability to cope appears to have a role in recovery from RPF.

Patient-Perceived Recovery and Outcomes After Silastic Implant Arthroplasty.

In some chronic musculoskeletal conditions, patients with persistent pain and disability have still achieved recovery through behavioral adaptations (readjustment) or cognitive coping (redefinition). Although the pendulum shift from physician-reported clinical indicators to patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) has recently focused on quantifying residual pain and disability to determine recovery (resolution), whether patients are capable of coping with any ongoing deficits and achieving other forms of recovery has not been considered. We performed a retrospective case series to assess patient-perceived recovery and outcomes after silastic implant arthroplasty for hallux rigidus. From July 2006 to July 2016, 28 patients at a single institution were enrolled. PROMs were prospectively obtained and compared between patients considering themselves recovered without or with residual deficits (recovered-resolved, recovered-not resolved) and those not recovered. Holistic satisfaction, procedure-specific satisfaction, complications, reoperations, and failure rates were recorded. Overall, 50.0% perceived themselves as recovered-resolved, 43% as recovered-not resolved, and 7% as not recovered. The mean modified Foot Function Index was 17.26, the verbal analog scale for pain score was 2.03, and implant survivorship 100% at a median of 67 (interquartile range 28.4 to 103.5) months. Although only 50% of patients reported complete symptom resolution, satisfaction was high, and most perceived themselves as recovered, suggesting recovery in hallux rigidus might not always be predicated by the complete resolution of all symptomatology. Although PROMs relying on pain inference and functional disability will continue to be utilized with increasing frequency, foot and ankle surgeons should be cognizant of their inherent limitations in assessing other forms of recovery.

Publication Rates for Oral Manuscript and Poster Presentations From the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons: 2010 to 2014.

The American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS) annual conference has served as a premiere platform to disseminate the latest innovations and research in the field of foot and ankle surgery. The quality of national society conferences is often assessed indirectly by analyzing the the journal publication rate of the abstracts presented. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the journal publication rate for abstracts (oral manuscripts and posters) accepted for presentation at the ACFAS conference from 2010 to 2014. All accepted abstracts from this period were compiled by the ACFAS office. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus searches were performed using abstract titles and author names. Overall, the journal publication rate was 76.9% (83 of 108) for oral manuscripts and 23.2% (258 of 1113) for poster abstracts. The mean time to publication was 9.6 (range 0 to 44) months and 19.8 (range 0 to 66) months for oral and poster abstracts, respectively. The most common journal for abstract publication was The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. Notably, the ACFAS oral manuscript publication rate from 2010 to 2014 (76.9%) exceeded its previously reported rate from 1999 to 2008 (67.5%) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society podium publication rate from 2008 to 2012 (73.7%). To the best of our knowledge, the publication incidence for oral abstracts presented at the ACFAS conference is now the highest reported of any national foot and ankle society conference to date.