Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surgery ; 176(2): 406-413, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796388

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Social determinants of health are increasingly recognized to shape health outcomes. Yet, the effect of socioeconomic vulnerability on outcomes after emergency general surgery remains under-studied. METHODS: All adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations for emergency general surgery operations (appendectomy, cholecystectomy, laparotomy, large bowel resection, perforated ulcer repair, or small bowel resection), within 2 days of non-elective admission were tabulated in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Socioeconomic vulnerability was defined using relevant diagnosis codes and comprised economic, educational, healthcare, environmental, and social needs. Patients demonstrating socioeconomic vulnerability were considered Vulnerable (others: Non-Vulnerable). Multivariable models were constructed to evaluate the independent associations between socioeconomic vulnerability and key outcomes. RESULTS: Of ∼1,788,942 patients, 177,764 (9.9%) were considered Vulnerable. Compared to Non-Vulnerable, Vulnerable patients were older (67 [55-77] vs 58 years [41-70), P < .001), more often insured by Medicaid (16.4 vs 12.7%, P < .001), and had a higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (4 [3-5] vs 2 [1-3], P < .001). After risk adjustment and with Non-Vulnerable as a reference, Vulnerable remained linked with a greater likelihood of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.64, confidence interval 1.58-1.70) and any perioperative complication (adjusted odds ratio 2.02, confidence interval 1.98-2.06). Vulnerable also experienced a greater duration of stay (ß+4.64 days, confidence interval +4.54-4.74) and hospitalization costs (ß+$1,360, confidence interval +980-1,740). Further, the Vulnerable cohort demonstrated increased odds of non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio 2.44, confidence interval 2.38-2.50) and non-elective readmission within 30 days of discharge (adjusted odds ratio 1.29, confidence interval 1.26-1.32). CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic vulnerability is independently associated with greater morbidity, resource use, and readmission after emergency general surgery. Novel interventions are needed to build hospital screening and care pathways to improve disparities in outcomes.


Assuntos
Fatores Socioeconômicos , Populações Vulneráveis , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Emergências , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Cirurgia Geral , Cirurgia de Cuidados Críticos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...