Polymer versus Titanium Clips in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Surgical clips are commonly used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cystic duct and artery ligation. Titanium and polymer clips are the two most common types used for this indication. Given the cost-saving potential, design advantages, and decreased incidence of complications associated with polymer clips, we sought to study whether there is a clinically significant difference in outcome between polymer and titanium clips in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Fifty consecutive cases using polymer clips followed by 50 consecutive cases using metal clips over a 6-month period by residents under the direction of a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. The following outcomes were evaluated: incidence of bile leak, postoperative bleeding, need for additional procedures, hospital length of stay, and cost. RESULTS: We found that significantly more misfires occurred with the use of the polymer clips (n=17) than with the titanium clips (n=2, p<.001). Eight cases (16%) required opening of an additional polymer clip cartridge to complete the operation. Despite this additional expense, the total cost as it pertained to clip usage ($30.32 USD) was still lower than that using titanium clips ($139.17 USD). While these numbers were not statistically significant, three cases had bile leaks and required additional procedures, all of which were performed with metal clips. No postoperative bleeds were identified and there was no difference in hospital length of stay; most patients were discharged on the day of the procedure. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate comparable clinical outcomes between laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed with polymer and titanium clips, though polymer clip usage carries a lower cost.

Robotic Plication of Rectus Diastasis with Associated Hernias: A Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Rectus diastases (RD) are caused by a weakening of the abdominal musculature and a widening of the linea alba. Some patients are often erroneously told that they are hernias. Despite the fact that they are not true hernias, they are often associated with true hernias and undergo concomitant repairs. Robotic plication of these diastases has been gaining more widespread use in the past few years, but literature regarding outcomes remains limited. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with RD and concomitant ventral hernia that underwent robotic repair were assessed from 2016 to present. Demographics, perioperative morbidity, and outcomes were reviewed, and descriptive analyses were performed. RESULTS: This series consists of 14 patients with an average age of 50.7 years (range 33-78 years), 64% female, and 86% Caucasian. All patients had associated umbilical or ventral/incisional hernia with an average defect size of 7.1cm2 and average mesh size of 254cm2. Robotic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (RTAPP) repair was performed in 67% of cases and robotic extended total extraperitoneal (ReTEP) repair was performed in 33%. Two patients (17%) required conversion to open repair. Hospital length of stay was 0.7 days. There was no morbidity in these patients. At an average follow-up of 2.6 years (range 54-2122 days), the hernia/diastasis recurrence rate is 7.1%. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that robotic plication with intraperitoneal sublay mesh could be an acceptable surgical approach for RD associated with concomitant ventral hernia repair. Further investigation is required to assess outcomes in a larger group of patients and to determine long-term recurrence and complication rates.

Are Surgeons of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative Following Guidelines in Umbilical and Epigastric Hernia Repair?

BACKGROUND: Umbilical and epigastric hernias are among the top three most common hernia surgeries performed in the USA with varied techniques. The European and Americas Hernia Societies (EAHS) recently published guidelines for repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. We evaluated how closely the general surgeons of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) follow these guidelines and to identify areas for possible improvement. METHOD: Data from patients undergoing elective and emergent umbilical or epigastric hernia repair from 2013 to 2021 were extracted from the ACHQC database. The procedures performed on eligible subjects were compared to those proposed by the EAHS guidelines. Data was reported as a percentage and a cutoff of 70% was selected to determine compliance. RESULTS: Based on these criteria, 11,088 patients were included and most of the recommendations, including appropriate preoperative antibiotic dosing (96.1% umbilical; 97.2% epigastric), permanent mesh selection (umbilical 97.8%; 96.1 epigastric), mesh fixation with suture (83.6% umbilical; 75.5% epigastric), use of mesh for open repair of hernias greater than 1 cm (83.6 umbilical; 85.7 epigastric), and primary defect closure during open (98.6% umbilical; 97.5% epigastric) and laparoscopic (99.6% umbilical; 100% epigastric) repair, were met. DISCUSSION: Surgeons of the ACHQC adhere to most of the published guidelines on umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Further research is needed to reinforce or modify the existing recommendations. Standardization of surgical approach will facilitate additional research needed to improve procedural efficiency, while reducing negative outcomes and cost.

Situations That Preclude Routine Intraoperative Cholangiography.

Intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) is a useful tool for surgeons to assess anatomy of the biliary tree and diagnose biliary pathology. Many surgeons utilize cholangiography in most cases in hopes of preventing ductal injuries and are deemed routine cholangiographers. There is little data on the success rate and reasons why IOC is not performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of routine cholangiography and to determine reasons why cholangiography was not performed. 693 cholecystectomies were analyzed. Intraoperative cholangiogram was attempted in 553 (79.8%) of these cases. The success rate of performing cholangiograms in those attempted was 93.3%. Intraoperative cholangiogram was not attempted in 140 patients (20.2%) for various reasons. Although many surgeons consider themselves routine cholangiographers, there are times when IOC is not feasible. Knowledge of these reasons may help clarify indications for IOC. For most cases, routine cholangiography appears to be feasible.