Routine chest X-ray after percutaneous tracheostomy is unnecessary.

Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) is an increasingly common procedure in the management of critically ill patients. Current practice for both open and percutaneous tracheostomies is a post-procedure chest X-ray to rule out potentially life-threatening complications such as a pneumothorax or tube malposition. Our study evaluated the utility of chest X-ray after PT. A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients undergoing PT at Kern Medical Center between January 1999 and December 2003. Charts were reviewed for age, sex, and clinical outcome as well as the radiologist's interpretation of the postprocedure chest X-ray. A total of 73 procedures were completed in 47 men and 26 women. The majority of the tracheostomies were in trauma patients who needed prolonged ventilatory support. There were no complications identified on postprocedure chest X-ray. A single patient was converted to an open procedure secondary to bleeding. We conclude that routine chest X-ray after PT is unnecessary.

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: is the postoperative infectious complication rate different?

Despite the reported advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), there is debate about the postoperative infectious complication rate. Our study attempts to determine if the infectious complication rate between LA and open appendectomy (OA) is different. A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent appendectomy at Kern Medical Center between 1999 and 2003. Age, sex, white blood cell count, temperature, pathology, and postoperative complications were identified. Fifty-seven patients underwent LA, and 159 patients underwent OA. The groups were well matched for demographics, white blood cell count, temperature, and percent perforated appendicitis. There was an overall 9.3 per cent complication rate. The infectious complication rate in OA versus LA group was statistically different (6.3% vs 17.6%, P = 0.04). The infectious complication rate in the LA group was significantly higher than in the OA group. Further large randomized trials are necessary to confirm our findings and to identify if LA is appropriate for a subset of appendicitis patients.

The efficacy of postoperative oral antibiotics in appendicitis: a randomized prospective double-blinded study.

The conventional treatment of acute appendicitis is appendectomy followed by intravenous (IV) antibiotics until intraabdominal infection has resolved. It is controversial as to whether it is efficacious to add a course of oral antibiotics after cessation of IV antibiotics. All consenting patients who presented to Kern Medical Center between October 2000 and June 2003 with acute appendicitis were entered into the study. Perforated/gangrenous appendicitis was equally represented in the two study arms. After appendectomy, and when IV antibiotics were ready to be discontinued, patients were randomized to receive a 7-day outpatient course of either placebo (Group 1) or oral antibiotics (Group 2). Patients were monitored for infectious complications for a minimum of 3 months, and there was no statistical difference (11.5% in Group 1 vs 12.1% in Group 2, P = 0.61). The data suggest that adding a course of outpatient oral antibiotics, after completing a course of IV antibiotics, does not decrease postoperative infectious complications in appendicitis patients.