The Biomechanical Investigation of Osseointegration Levels in Titanium Implants Simultaniously Placed with Different Bone Grafts.

BACKGROUND: Dental implant-supported prostheses have been scientifically accepted and have been a common treatment choice in the case reconstructing of partial or total tooth loss. In additon, bone grafts (alloplast, xsenograft, allograft) are frequently used in implant and sinus lift surgical procedures. AIM: The aim of this study is to investigate the bone-implant osseointegration levels of titanium implants simultaniously placed with different bone grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the study, 32 female S. Dawley rats were divided into four groups. In the control group (n = 8), turned surface implants with a 2.5 mm diameter and a 4 mm length were placed in the tibia of the rats without the use of a graft material. In the experimental groups, bone cavities were opened in the tibias of the rats and a synthetic (alloplast) graft (n = 8), human allograft (n = 8), and bovine xsenograft (n = 8) were placed simultaniously with a 2.5 mm diameter and a 4 mm length turned surface titanium implants. The cavities in the experimental groups were opened with a 4 mm diameter and a 5 mm length. After 8 weeks of recovery, all rats were sacrificed at the end of the experimental period. The implants and surrounding bone tissue were removed. The removed tissue was subjected to biomechanical analysis in order to evaluate bone-implant osseointegration and peri-implant new bone formation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U-test were used in the study. Significance was evaluated at the P < 0.05 level. RESULTS: In the biomechanical analyses, it was determined that there was no statistically significant difference between the control group and the other three groups in which different graft materials were applied in terms of bone-implant osseointegration (P > 0.05). In other words, in the biomechanical analyses, no statistical difference was found between any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of this study, it can be thought that different graft materials can be successfully used in peri-implant-guided bone regeneration and may be an alternative to autogenous grafts.

The Investigation of Bone-Implant Connection and New Bone Formation in Fasting and High-Fatty Diet Rats.

BACKGROUND: Hyperlipidemia caused by a high-fat diet (HFD) has many adverse effects on the cardiovascular system, including vascular problems. In addition, a HFD also has significant adverse effects on bone health. AIM: The aim of this study is to examine bone-implant osteointegration and new bone formation in peri-implant defects in fasting and high-fatty diet applied rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 28 female Sprague Dawley rats were used. The rats were divided into four groups, with seven rats in each group: the control group on a normal diet (Group 1) (n = 7), the fasted group (Group 2) (n = 7), the high-fatty diet (HFD) group (Group 3) (n = 7), and the fasted and HFD group (Group 4) (n = 7). Titanium implants with a diameter of 2.5 mm and a length of 4 mm were placed in the right tibia bones of the subjects, and a bone graft corresponding to 2 mm of the implant length was placed in the bone defect applied to the neck region. All rats that continued the administered diet for 12 weeks were sacrificed at the end of the experiment period. The implants and surrounding bone tissue were surgically removed and subjected to biomechanical analysis to assess bone-implant osteointegration and peri-implant new bone formation. RESULTS: It was determined that there was no statistically significant difference between the rats in the control group and the other three groups in terms of bone-implant osteointegration and peri-implant new bone formation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: As a result of this study, it was determined that fasting or maintaining a HFD does not adversely affect bone-implant osteointegration or peri-implant new bone formation in the tibias of rats.