Comparison of Planar Imaging Using Dual-phase Tc-99m-sestamibi Scintigraphy and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Hyperparathyroidism.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare Technetium-99m (Tc-99m)-sestamibi dual-phase planar imaging method and delayed phase single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and to evaluate the accuracy of scintigraphy with histopathological results. Methods: Thirty-six patients with a prediagnosis of hyperparathyroidism, who had not been operated on the neck region before, and were not followed up for any other malignancy, and has confirmed histopathologic and biochemical diagnosis after parathyroidectomy, were retrospectively scanned and included in the study. The images of 36 patients who underwent dual-phase Tc-99m-sestamibi planar scintigraphy at the 20th and 120th minutes in the nuclear medicine clinic and delayed phase SPECT/CT imaging immediately after the 120th minute planar imaging were evaluated visually by two nuclear medicine specialists as positive or negative lesion. Dual-phase planar and SPECT/CT images were statistically compared in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Results: Thirty-six patients with 41 lesions were evaluated. Comparing dual-phase planar imaging and delayed phase SPECT/CT revealed, sensitivity 84.21%-94.74%, specificity 66.67%-66.67%. Positive predictive value 96.97%-97.30%, negative predictive value 25%-50.0%, accuracy 82.93%-92.68% respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between planar imaging and SPECT/CT; SPECT/CT localized the lesion more accurately (p<0.05). Conclusion: SPECT/CT is superior to planar imaging in determining the anatomical details and localization of the lesion, especially in determining the depth of the lesions in the neck and whether it is ectopic. In patients with hyperparathyroidism, SPECT/CT should be used routinely to detect parathyroid pathologies because it has a lower rate of error and higher accuracy rate.

Partial cecum resection using endostapler in acute complicated appendicitis with appendiceal base necrosis.

INTRODUCTION: The method of stump closure is controversial in complicated patients, especially with appendix base necrosis or perforation. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of partial cecum resection technique with an endostapler in patients with appendix base necrosis or perforation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients who underwent laparoscopic partial cecum resection due to appendix base necrosis or perforation between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. In acute complicated appendicitis with appendiceal base necrosis or perforation, it was performed by laparoscopic partial cecum resection using an endostapler within a safe surgical margin. Demographic characteristics, duration of operation, days of hospital stay, and intra- and post-operative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients is 42.72 ±16.69, female/male ratio was 19/17 (52.8%/47.2%). No intraoperative complications developed. Mean operative time and hospital stay were 104.75 ±34.96, 4.58 ±2.82 days, respectively. Post-operative complications developed in 5 (13.7%) patients. One of them was wound infection (2.7%), 2 of them were ileus (5.5%) and 2 patients had an intraabdominal abscess (5.5%). Stapler line leak was not observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an endostapler in laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and effective technique in cases where appendix base necrosis, appendix perforation or severe inflammation affects the base of the cecum.

Rat Model Investigation on the Role of Biomarkers in Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

OBJECTIVES: Liver function is affected by ischemiareperfusion. Ischemia-reperfusion injury to the liver often follows hepatobiliary surgery. Here, we investigated biomarkers of liver ischemia-reperfusion injury using an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this study, 24 male Sprague Dawley rats (146-188 g) were divided into 4 groups: group A was the control group, group B was the partial hepatic ischemia-reperfusion group, group C was the total hepatic ischemia-reperfusion group, and group D was the intermittent total hepatic ischemiareperfusion group. Laboratory liver function levels were measured before ischemia, after ischemia, and after reperfusion. We used liver and renal biopsies for histopathological examination at the end of the study. RESULTS: After clamping and reperfusion, alanine aminotransferase and cystatin C levels in groups B, C, and D were significantly higher than levels in group A. In group B, after clamping, neutrophil gelatinaseassociated lipocalin levels were higher than in groups A and D, with significantly higher level than in group D after reperfusion. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin levels decreased significantly in groups B, C, and D after reperfusion. There was significantly greater hepatic damage in groups B, C, and D compared with group A but no significant differences in renal injury scores among the groups. There was a significant positive correlation between hepatic damage and renal injury. With regard to histopathological examination versus laboratory results, a statistically significant positive correlation was shown between grade of hepatic damage and serum alanine aminotransferase and cystatin C levels. Similarly, there was a positive correlation between renal damage score and alanine aminotransferase level. CONCLUSIONS: In our animal model, alanine amino - transferase and cystatin C levels tended to increase with ischemia-reperfusion injury levels but neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin decreased during reperfusion. In liver ischemia, we suggest that neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin may be an important biomarker for distinguishing the reperfusion phase.

Comparison of slit mesh versus nonslit mesh in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic hernia repair integrates the advantages of tension-free preperitoneal mesh support of the groin with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery procedures. AIM: To compare outcomes between slit mesh (SM) and nonslit mesh (NSM) placement in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 353 patients who underwent TEP inguinal hernia repair between January 2010 and December 2011. One hundred forty-nine and 154 hernias were operated on in the SM and NSM groups, respectively. Postoperative complications, recurrence, early postoperative pain, and chronic pain levels were evaluated. RESULTS: In a total of 303 patients, hernia repair was performed as 395 direct and indirect hernias. Nonslit mesh was converted from TEP to transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) in 4 patients in the group and 6 patients in the slit mesh group. The average operation time of the SM group was significantly higher than that of the NSM group (p < 0.001). In the evaluation of early postoperative pain, VAS levels of the NSM group were statistically significantly lower than those of the SR group in all evaluations (p = 0.001). The pain rate of the SM group after 3 months of chronic pain was significantly higher than that of the NSM group (p = 0.004). There was no difference in recurrence rate, 6th month chronic pain, wound infection or wound hematoma. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SM and NSM in TEP operations is not different in terms of recurrence and complications. However, the use of NSM gives better results in terms of early postoperative pain and chronic pain.

Efficacy and reliability of the use of a needle grasper to prevent trocar site hernia.

INTRODUCTION: Port site herniation is one of the serious complications of laparoscopic surgery, which decreases its benefits. Closure of a fascia defect at the port site is an important problem of laparoscopic surgery, especially in obese patients. AIM: To evaluate needle grasper fascia closure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We closed the port site fascia using a percutaneous organ-holding device (needle grasper) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. This study included 334 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2015 and January 2017 in our hospital. Patients were divided into 2 fascia closure groups: group 1 with a standard simple suturing technique and group 2 with a needle grasper to close the port site. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: There were 243 female and 91 male (total 334) patients with the mean age of 49.18 ±13.15 years. Only 1 patient in the BMI > 30 kg/m2 group of patients had port site hernia development with the needle grasper technique at the end of the 8-month follow-up period. The port site hernia incidence was higher in group 1 than group 2 (p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in terms of operation duration between the two groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.709, respectively). In patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m2, both operation duration and port site hernia incidence were higher in simple suture closure than in the needle grasper technique (p < 0.001, p = 0.016, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The needle grasper technique is easy, simple, safe, fast, and effective for fascia closure of port sites. This method can also be applied in obese patients easily, safely and in a short time.

Laparoscopy offers diagnosis and treatment in abdominal stab injuries.

PURPOSE: To assess the role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal stab injuries (ASI). METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures due to ASI were included in the study. Hemodynamic instability, injuries to the posterior trunk, concomitant severe cranial injuries, and prior abdominal operations were considered as contraindication for laparoscopy. RESULTS: From January 1997 to March 2006, 88 patients underwent laparoscopic management of ASI. In 45 patients (51.1%), there was no intra-abdominal pathology requiring surgical intervention (nontherapeutic laparoscopy) and 5 patients in this group had no peritoneal penetration (negative laparoscopy). In another 25 patients (28.4%), laparoscopic treatment was performed (therapeutic laparoscopy), including bleeding control in liver, colonic, gastric, and diaphragmatic repairs and intra-abdominal bleeding control. Laparotomy was avoided in a total of 70 (79.5%) patients. In 18 patients (20.5%), laparoscopy was converted to laparotomy. There was no mortality, and except one missed small bowel injury nor perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing laparoscopy. In the laparotomy group, major complications were seen in 7 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is safe and efficient in the management of ASI and should be more frequently considered as a therapeutic tool.