The role of LENT and PROMISE scores in predicting survival in malignant pleural effusion.

Background: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a condition, that can be seen in 15% of patients diagnosed with cancer. Because of the short overall survival, it is important to identify the appropriate treatment. In addition to the palliation of secondary symptoms due to MPE, it should also be decided in which cases a more aggressive treatment is to be followed. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance of LENT and clinical PROMISE scores in predicting survival in patients with MPE. Methods: Age, sex, smoking history, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, cancer type, history of chemotherapy/radiotherapy, laboratory values, and pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase were recorded. The LENT and the PROMISE scores were calculated and risk categories were determined. During the follow-up, blood tests and tomography controls were performed on the patients as routine. The overall survival was calculated as the period from the date of diagnosis of MPE to death or until December 31, 2019. Results: A total of 169 patients were included. The median age was 65 (26-86). In the single-variable analysis, there was a significant increase in mortality risk in the poor performance score and if the LENT risk group progressed from the low-to medium-/high-risk group or PROMISE categories A to B, A to C or A to D. In multivariate analysis, mortality risk in 1, 3, 6, and 12 months increased significantly in poor performance score, in PROMISE category B, C, and D. In high LENT risk-group, an increased mortality risk was shown in only 12 months of survival. Conclusions: Our data show that poor performance score (ECOG 3-4), PROMISE category B, C, and D significantly increase mortality risk and the LENT score is inadequate in predicting survival.

Use of adjuvant chemotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer: Is advanced age a prognostic factor?

PURPOSE: In patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the effect of age on adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) after primary surgical treatment is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of age and other clinical variables on survival in NSCLC patients who received adjuvant CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: NSCLC patients who underwent primary resection and received adjuvant CT between January 2012 and January 2016 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two age groups: (1) patients >65 years old (older patient group) and (2) patients ≤ 65 years old (young patient group). The effects of clinical variables such as age, histology, pT stage, pN stage, pTNM stage, adjuvant thoracic radiotherapy, and recurrence status on survival were assessed using the log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 91 NSCLC patients who received adjuvant CT after complete resection were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 60 (36-73) years. Eighty-six percent of the patients were male. 49.4% had squamous NSCLC and 50.6% had nonsquamous NSCLC. 59% had stage I and II disease and 41% had stage III disease. The mean overall survival was 61.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 51.28-72.69] in the young patient group and 73.1 months (95% CI 60.24-85.94) in the older patient group . The mean disease-free survival was 47.0 months (95% CI 37.81-56.23) in the young patient group and 51.1 months (95% CI 40.68-57.17) in the older patient group (P = 0.119 and P = 0.407, respectively). Pathological stage III [heart rate (HR): 2.615, P = 0.014] and presence of recurrence (HR: 2.496, P = 0.019) were found to be independent risk factors. However, age did not show statistical significance (HR: 0.428, 95% CI 0.128-1.427, P = 0.167). CONCLUSION: In NSCLC patients who underwent complete resection and received adjuvant CT, advanced age had no prognostic effect on survival.

Frequency of Silent Brain Metastasis Before Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) decreases incidence of brain metastasis and improves survival in patients with limited disease-small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) who achieved complete response (CR) after treatment. There is no satisfactory evidence about the necessity of new brain imaging for asymptomatic metastasis immediately prior to PCI. The present study aimed to evaluate the frequency of brain metastasis in SCLC patients without neurological symptoms who are candidates for PCI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data files of 243 patients with SCLC referred for cranial irradiation were retrospectively reviewed. The patients with following characteristics were enrolled to the study; 1) LD-SCLC patients with CR after chemoradiotherapy who are candidates for PCI. 2) No neurological signs or symptoms of brain metastasis after chemoradiotherapy. 3) Having brain imaging at initial diagnosis and before PCI. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (83 male, 83.3%) were included in this study. Median age was 60 years. Time interval between initial and reevaluation for brain metastasis was median 5.5 months (range; 4.7-7.1). Asymptomatic brain metastasis rate was 20.2% (18/99). CONCLUSION: Even if local disease is under control, asymptomatic brain metastasis is not rare. Therefore, patients who are candidates for PCI after completion of chemoradiotherapy should be reimaged for brain metastasis before PCI.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy in Stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer: Turkey experience.

AIM: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard therapy for patients with unresectable Stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of concurrent CRT in unresectable Stage III NSCLC in Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 82 patients with histologically proven unresectable Stage III NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, who received concurrent CRT in two different referral centers. Treatment consisted of two cycles of cisplatin at 50 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 and etoposide 50 mg/m 2 between days 1 and 5, 29-33 and concurrent radiotherapy administered once daily, 1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction, at a total dose of 60-66 Gy. RESULTS: The stages of the patients were Stage IIIA in 39 (47.5%) and IIIB in 43 (52.5%) patients. Complete and partial responses were achieved in 15 (18.2%) and 31 (37.8%) of the patients, respectively. Twenty-eight (34.2%) patients had stable disease and 8 (9.8) had progressive disease. Forty-one (50%) patients recurred during follow-up. The primary site of recurrence was as distant metastasis in 19 (23.2%) patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 20 months (95% confidence interval; 12.9-27.09 months), 3 and 4 years survivals were 27.9% and 20.9%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9 months, 3 and 4 years PFSs were 20.1% and 16.1%. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity. In 15 (19.2%) patients grade 2-3 lung toxicity and in seven (8.5%) patients' grade 2-3 dysphagia were reported. CONCLUSION: Concurrent CRT with cisplatin and etoposide schedule is a well-tolerated regimen with acceptable toxicity profile and survival rates in patients with unresectable Stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC. Median survival and OS results were consistent with the literature.