The effect of intra-abdominal pressure on sensory block level of single-shot spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Increased intra-abdominal pressure in pregnancy is thought to affect intrathecal drug spread. However this assumption remains largely untested. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the association between intra-abdominal pressure and maximum sensory block level in parturients receiving spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. METHODS: Parturients having elective cesarean section with single-shot spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5mg were included. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured via a bladder catheter after establishing a T4 sensory block and at the end of surgery in the supine position with 10° left lateral tilt. We recorded demographic data, descriptive characteristics of pregnancy, self-reported weight gain and weight of the newborn. As secondary outcomes, we evaluated onset of sensory block, maximum sensory block, motor block, number of hypotensive episodes, fluid and ephedrine requirements, time to first analgesic request, time to one-point recovery of motor block and side effects. RESULTS: The median value of the maximum sensory block level was T2 in 117 parturients. Median [interquartile range] pre-incision and postoperative intra-abdominal pressure were 13 [11-16] and 9 [6-10]mmHg respectively. No association was observed between maximum sensory block level and pre-incision intra-abdominal pressure (P=0.83). Weight was associated with pre-incision intra-abdominal pressure with an estimated odds ratio of 1.04 per kg (99.4% CI: 1.00-1.08). There was a moderate correlation between pre-incision and postoperative intra-abdominal pressure with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.67 (99.5% CI: 0.5-0.79). There was no association between pre-incision intra-abdominal pressure and secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In parturients, intra-abdominal pressure was not associated with spinal block spread, block onset time, recovery or side effects.

The effects of subfascial wound versus epidural levo-bupivacaine infusion on postoperative pain following hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Local analgesia through wound catheters is used as a part of multimodal analgesia. The efficacy of continuous subfascial wound infusion compared to epidural analgesia is unknown for abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-BSO) via Pfannenstiel incision. The aim of this study was to compare the aforementioned two methods in this type of surgery for postoperative morphine consumption, acute and persistent postsurgical pain. METHODS: Fifty patients enrolled in the study were randomly allocated to receive continuous 10 mL/h levobupivacaine either via subfascial (Group S) or epidural (Group E) catheter for 48 h postoperatively. In Group S 0.25% levobupivacaine was used for the first six hours and 0.125% thereafter, whereas Group E received 0.125% levobupivacaine throughout the study period. Cumulative morphine consumption, static and dynamic pain, gastrointestinal recovery, ambulation, patient satisfaction, hospital stay, as well as pain at 2nd and 6th months were evaluated. RESULTS: Group S was superior to Group E regarding cumulative morphine consumption (16.8±7.2 mg and 28.7±10.3 mg respectively, P<0.001; mean difference -11.9 with 95% CI of the difference -17.1 to -6.7) and pain relief. Patient satisfaction was higher in Group S compared to Group E (P=0.006). Less postoperative vomiting was observed in Group S. No difference was detected in length of hospital stay and persistent postsurgical pain incidence. CONCLUSION: Wound analgesia via subfascial catheter with continuous levobupivacaine infusion decreases postoperative morphine consumption and increases patient satisfaction compared to epidural analgesia with no difference in persistent postsurgical pain following TAH-BSO via Pfannenstiel incision.

Comparison of the effects of thoracic and lumbar epidural anaesthesia on induction and maintenance doses of propofol during total i.v. anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: In this randomized, double-blind study, the effects of thoracic and lumbar epidural anaesthesia on the induction doses (IDs) and maintenance doses (MDs) of propofol during bispectral index (BIS) guided total i.v. anaesthesia were compared. METHODS: Fifty-four patients (three groups, n=18 each) undergoing urological surgery in lumbotomy position were studied in Groups T (Th7-8) and L (L3-4), epidural anaesthesia was performed with initial doses obtaining sensorial block at Th4 (sd 1) followed by 7 ml h(-1) infusion; Group C received no epidural anaesthesia intraoperatively. The ID (BIS <45) and MD (BIS: 40-50) of propofol and recovery (BIS >80) and extubation times were recorded. RESULTS: The volume to obtain a block was significantly lower in Group T than in Group L [10.7 (1.5) vs 14.7 (1.0) ml; P<0.001]. ID was significantly higher in Group C compared with that in Groups T and L [2.16 (0.15) vs 1.33 (0.19) vs 1.46 (0.14) mg kg(-1), respectively; P<0.001] with no significant difference between Groups T and L. For MD, there were significant differences between all groups [3.82 (0.9) vs 5.8 (1.32) vs 9.21 (0.55) mg kg(-1) h(-1) in Groups T, L, and C, respectively; P<0.001]. For recovery and extubation times, Group T

BIS guided sedation with propofol during spinal anaesthesia: influence of anaesthetic level on sedation requirement.

BACKGROUND: In this prospective, clinical study we tested the hypothesis whether two different doses of spinal administered bupivacaine and accordingly, two different levels of spinal anaesthesia can affect the dose requirement of propofol during BIS guided sedation. METHODS: Fifty women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy (high spinal group, HS) or transvaginal tape (TVT) procedure for urinary incontinence (low spinal group, LS) under spinal anaesthesia were enrolled to the study. In group HS, 17.5 mg and in group LS, 7.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine were given intrathecally. After 15 min to obtain the appropriate level of spinal anaesthesia, propofol infusion was started at a rate of 100 microg kg(-1) min(-1) to reach a BIS level of less than 75 (onset time), and titrated to maintain the BIS value between 65 and 75. Propofol infusion was stopped 45 min after placing the spinal to measure the time to reach a BIS level of 90 (recovery time). RESULTS: Median anaesthetic level was T3 (T1-4) in the HS group and T10 (T9-11) in the LS group. In both the HS and the LS groups, onset time was 226 (47) vs 273 (48) s (P=0.001), recovery time was 234 (47) vs 202 (56) s (P=0.03), total dose of propofol was 2.17 (0.43) vs 3.14 (0.56) mg kg(-1) (P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: A high spinal block obtained with hyperbaric bupivacaine 17.5 mg was associated with a faster onset, delayed recovery and lower doses of propofol sedation compared with a low spinal block with 7.5 mg of the same drug.