Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Emerg Nurs ; 47(6): 948-954, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34294455

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Several vaccines have been developed and approved for use against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2; however, the use of personal protective equipment remains important owing to the lack of effective specific treatment and whole community immunity. Hydroxychloroquine sulfate was a treatment option in the early days of the pandemic; however, it was subsequently removed owing to a lack of evidence as an effective treatment. We aimed to evaluate the testing and infection characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 among health care personnel and determine the effectiveness of prophylactic hydroxychloroquine sulfate use to prevent transmission. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted between May 1 and September 30, 2020. The health care personnel included in the study were physicians, nurses, and paraprofessional support personnel. The health records of health care personnel who had been tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 using polymerase chain reaction were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 508 health care personnel were included in the study. A total of 152 (29.9%) health care personnel were diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019. The positive polymerase chain reaction rate was 80.3% (n = 122). A comparison of infected and uninfected health care personnel showed a difference in age and occupation and no difference in sex, working area, and prophylactic hydroxychloroquine sulfate use. DISCUSSION: Protective measures in low-risk areas of our hospital require improvements. All health care personnel should be trained on personal protective equipment use. There was no evidence to support the effectiveness of prophylactic hydroxychloroquine sulfate against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 transmission.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Teste para COVID-19 , Humanos , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Turquia/epidemiologia
2.
Australas Emerg Care ; 24(3): 235-239, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33358480

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients is a potentially high-risk procedure for healthcare professionals. Personal protective equipment (PPE) is recommended to minimize contact with critical patients with COVID-19 infection. This study aimed to primarily examine the effect of PPE use on intubation time and success rate among prehospital healthcare professionals; additionally, we compared intubation times among prehospital health care professionals using PPE with direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy assistance. METHODS: In this prospective simulation study, we compared the intubation times and success rates among prehospital healthcare professionals who were or were not using PPE. Furthermore, demographic data, previous intubation experience, and previous intubation experience with PPE were recorded. RESULTS: Overall time to intubation with PPE use was 51.28±3.89s, which was significantly higher than that without PPE use (33.03±2.65s; p<0.001). In addition, the overall success rate with PPE use was 74.4%, which was significantly lower than that without PPE use (93%;p<0.001). PPE use increased the average intubation time by 19.73±2.59s with direct laryngoscopy and by 16.81±2.86s with video laryngoscopy (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PPE use is associated with increased intubation time and decreased success rate. Video laryngoscopy assistance in cases where PPE use is required facilitates faster endotracheal intubation than does direct laryngoscopy assistance.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Intubação Intratraqueal/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Laringoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Manequins , Estudos Prospectivos , Gravação em Vídeo
3.
Molecules ; 10(7): 767-71, 2005 Aug 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18007345

RESUMO

The crystal and molecular structure of the title compound,C24H36CoN10O(4).2(NO3).3(H2O).Cl, have been determined by X-ray analysis: Cc (No: 9), a = 17.6920(4) A, b = 11.8163(2) A, c = 16.4752(4) A, Beta = 91.679(1) degrees , Z = 4. The Co(III)ion is six-coordinated with octahedral geometry, the pyridine rings are planar and the piperazine rings assume chair conformations.


Assuntos
Cobalto , Piperazinas/química , Piridinas/química , Cristalografia por Raios X , Glioxilatos/química , Modelos Moleculares , Conformação Molecular , Vitamina B 12/análogos & derivados , Vitamina B 12/química
4.
Acta Crystallogr C ; 59(Pt 10): O598-600, 2003 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14532683

RESUMO

The title compound, C(24)H(25)NO(7), is a racemic mixture of 2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-3-ones. It crystallizes in the triclinic system, space group P1, with Z = 2. The asymmetric unit contains two enantiomorphic molecules and the structure is stabilized by hydrogen-bond contacts.


Assuntos
Pirróis/química , Acetatos/química , Anti-Infecciosos/química , Cristalografia por Raios X , Ligação de Hidrogênio , Estrutura Molecular
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...