RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gallstones are a major cause of acute pancreatitis, which is associated with high recurrence, morbidity, and mortality. Careful consideration of demographic and clinicopathological features is required to understand the association between the cause and severity of pancreatitis in various populations, and such crucial information is lacking for Jharkhand's population. Here, we sought to describe the demographic and clinicopathological features of gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis at a tertiary hospital in Ranchi. METHODS: This hospital-based descriptive study was conducted at Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences in Ranchi. The hospital records of patients admitted to the surgical unit with acute gallstone-induced pancreatitis from January 2023 to December 2023 were analyzed. The study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 72 patients admitted with acute gallstone-induced pancreatitis (mean age: 42.5 years), 46 (64%) were males and 26 (36%) were females. All 72 patients had abdominal pain and 44 (61%) were vomiting. The severe vs. non-severe pancreatitis groups differed significantly in age (≥40) and male gender (p = 0.013 and 0.031, respectively). A total of 45 (62.5%) patients had severe gallstone-induced pancreatitis, and the most common complication was acute kidney injury, followed by pleural effusion (18 (25%) and 13 (18.1%) cases, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that gallstone-induced pancreatitis was more common in males and that age and gender were significantly associated with severity. However, late presentation to the hospital may have influenced our study, resulting in more severe cases being reported, with the most common complication being acute kidney injury. To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe the demographic, clinicopathological, and outcome data of acute gallstone-induced pancreatitis in Ranchi. These results can guide hospital policy development to improve patient outcomes.
RESUMO
Purpose: The aim of the study was to dosimetrically compare intra-cavitary brachytherapy technique (ICBT) with free-hand (intra-cavitary + interstitial, IC + IS) technique. Material and methods: Twenty seven locally advanced carcinoma cervix patients were included in the study. Patients with more than medial 1/3rd parametrial residual disease without extending upto lateral pelvic wall were included, following external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in which cobalt-60 high-dose-rate (60Co HDR) brachytherapy source was used. Dose for both plans were 6.5 Gy × 4 fractions, 2 fractions per day, 6 hours apart, over 2 days. Free-hand brachytherapy technique, consisted of placement of central tandem and 2 ovoids along with needles without using template, was applied. Two plans were generated by activating and deactivating the needles, and compared by normalizing to V100. Results: A total of 79 needles were applied. Using paired-t test, dosimetric comparison of both the plans was done. Free-hand plan had a significant higher mean V90 (volume receiving 90% of the dose) of 94.2% compared with 87.22% in ICBT plan (p ≤ 0.0001). Free-hand and ICBT plans presented a mean V100 values of 89.06% and 81.51% (p ≤ 0.0001), respectively, favoring free-hand plan. The mean D90 (dose to 90% volume), D98, and D100 of free-hand plan were 6.28 Gray (Gy), 4.91 Gy, and 3.62 Gy, respectively, but equivalent parameters in ICBT plan were 5.26 Gy, 3.72 Gy, and 2.61 Gy, with p value ≤ 0.0001. In both the plans, D2cc of the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 4.59 Gy, 3.98 Gy, 2.77 Gy, and 4.46 Gy, 3.90 Gy, 2.67 Gy, respectively, with no statistical significance. Conclusions: Free-hand brachytherapy (IC + IS) achieves a statistically significant better dose distribution to high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) comparing with ICBT technique with similar dose to organs at risk.
