Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Physiol Hung ; 100(2): 173-85, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23524182

RESUMO

Previous experimental data suggest that steroids might have protective effects during hypoxic/ischemic injury of various organs. In this study, the association between dexamethason (Dexa) treatment and the anti-apoptotic SGK-1 was tested in ischemic renal injury. In vitro, HK-2 cells were exposed to 24 h hypoxia, and the effect of Dexa incubation on SGK-1 expression / activation and on cell death was studied. In an in vivo rat model of unilateral renal IR, animals were treated with Dexa, and serum renal function parameters, tissue injury and SGK-1 expression and localization were examined after different reperfusion times (2 h, 4 h and 24 h). Dexa at a dose of 2 mg/L exerted a protective effect on cell survival assessed by LDH release and vital staining paralleled by marked up-regulation of SGK-1. In rats, 2 mg/kg Dexa treatment 24 h prior to ischemia resulted in less severe tissue injury and ameliorated urea nitrogen levels 24 h after reperfusion. Furthermore, SGK-1 expression and phosphorylation were higher in Dexa animals demonstrated by Western blot and immunofluorescence technique. Our results provide novel data on the signalling mechanism of Dexa under hypoxia / ischemia and further support that Dexa emerges as an attractive pharmacological agent for the prevention of ischemic injury.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/prevenção & controle , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Imediatamente Precoces/metabolismo , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinases/metabolismo , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/prevenção & controle , Animais , Linhagem Celular , Dexametasona/farmacologia , Glucocorticoides/farmacologia , Humanos , Masculino , Fosforilação/efeitos dos fármacos
2.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 13(1): 81-91, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21595806

RESUMO

Solid-organ transplantation is the optimal long-term treatment for most patients with end-stage organ failure. After solid-organ transplantation, short-term graft survival significantly improved (1). However, due to chronic allograft nephropathy and death with functioning graft, long-term survival has not prolonged remarkably (2). Posttransplant immunosuppressive medications consist of one of the calcineurin inhibitors in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine (Aza) and steroids. All of them have different adverse effects, among which posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) events and infections causing the death of many transplant patients and it may directly contribute to graft failure (3). According to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (4), diabetes mellitus (DM) is defined by symptoms of diabetes (polyuria and polydipsia and weight loss) plus casual plasma glucose concentration ≥ 11.1 mmol/L or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or 2-h plasma glucose level ≥ 11.1 mmol/L following oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). This metabolic disorder occurring as a complication of organ transplantation has been recognized for many years. PTDM, which is a combination of decreased insulin secretion and increased insulin resistance, develops in 4.9/15.9% of liver transplant patients, in 4.7/11.5% of kidney recipients, and in 15/17.5% of heart and lung transplants [cyclosporine A (CyA)/tacrolimus (Tac)-based regimen, respectively] (5). Risk factors of PTDM can be divided into non-modifiable and modifiable ones (6), among which the most prominent is the immunosuppressive therapy being responsible for 74% of PTDM development (7). Emphasizing the importance of the PTDM, numerous studies have determined the long-term outcome. On the basis of these studies, graft and patient survival is tendentiously (8) or significantly (9, 10) decreased for those developing PTDM.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/etiologia , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Criança , Diabetes Mellitus/induzido quimicamente , Diabetes Mellitus/imunologia , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Modelos Biológicos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/induzido quimicamente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/imunologia , Fatores de Risco , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/efeitos adversos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos
3.
Transplant Proc ; 43(4): 1244-6, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21620100

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant recipients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy are considered to be at high risk of serious infectious complications. In 2009, a new influenza pandemic caused serious infections and deaths, especially among children and immunocompromised patients. Herein we have reported the safety and efficacy of a single-shot monovalent whole-virus vaccine against H1N1 infection in the pediatric renal transplant population. METHODS: In November and December 2009, we vaccinated 37 renal transplant children and adolescents and measured their antibody responses. Seroprotection, seroconversion, and seroconversion factors were analyzed at 21 days after vaccination. RESULTS: None of the vaccinated patients experienced vaccine-related side effects. None of the patients had an H1N1 influenza infection after vaccination. All of the patients showed elevations in antibody titer at 21 days after vaccination. In contrast, only 29.72% of the patients achieved a safe seroprotection level and only 18.75% a safe seroconversion rate. More intense immunosuppressive treatment displayed negative effect on seroprotection and seroconversion, and antibody production significantly increased with age. No other factor was observed to influence seroprotection. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend vaccination of children and adolescent renal transplant recipients against H1N1 virus. However, a single shot of vaccine may not be sufficient; to achieve seroprotection, a booster vaccination and measurement of the antibody response are needed to assure protection of our patients.


Assuntos
Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Hungria , Imunização Secundária , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...