Creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate estimation in patients with liver disease: the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation is not better.

OBJECTIVES: Limitations of serum creatinine in patients with an impaired liver function are well known. The commonly used modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation has a low diagnostic performance to approximate kidney function in patients after liver transplantation (LT) and patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula has been shown to provide a more accurate estimation of kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease, but studies in patients with liver disease are lacking. METHODS: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of CKD-EPI in comparison with the re-expressed MDRD formula in patients after LT (group 1; n=59) and in patients suffering from LC (group 2; n=44). GFR was measured by 99mTc-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (group 1) and inulin clearance (group 2). Bias, precision, and accuracy as compared with the measured GFR were determined. RESULTS: The measured mean GFR (95% confidence interval) was 52.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 (47.7; 56.9; group 1) and 35.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 (29.12; 41.3; group 2), respectively. In transplanted patients GFR estimation by CKD-EPI and MDRD did not significantly differ with respect to bias (9.7 vs. 4.3 ml/min/1.73 m2), precision (16.9 vs. 15.5 ml/min/1.73 m2) and accuracy (64.4 vs. 69.5% within 30% of 'true GFR'). In patients with LC, both formulae showed a very high bias (42.5 vs. 40.1 ml/min/1.73 m2), a very low precision (20.7 vs. 25.7 ml/min/1.73 m2) and accuracy (6.8 within 30% of the measured GFR in both groups). CONCLUSION: The CKD-EPI equation does not improve the creatinine-based GFR estimation in patients after LT. In patients with LC, both equations should not be applied as they extremely overestimate GFR.

Is beta-trace protein an alternative marker of glomerular filtration rate in liver transplant recipients?

BACKGROUND: Renal insufficiency is common after liver transplantation (LT). The use of creatinine (Crea) as a marker of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is limited in patients after LT. Beta-trace protein (BTP), an alternative marker of GFR, is independent of muscle mass and has not been evaluated in LT recipients. AIM: To evaluate BTP as an alternative tool to monitor renal function in LT recipients. METHODS: We determined the diagnostic performance of BTP in comparison to Crea and cystatin C (CysC) in 52 patients, who concomitantly underwent (99m)Tc-DTPA-clearance measurements. Furthermore, we evaluated bias, precision and accuracy of five recently developed BTP-based equations to estimate GFR. RESULTS: The average measured GFR was 51 (46.1; 56.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2). Using a cut-off of 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) the area under the curve (AUC) was nearly identical for all markers. At a decision point of 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) BTP showed only a trend towards a higher AUC compared with Crea and CysC (0.806 vs. 0.754 and 0.760, respectively; P>0.2). In comparison to the modification of diet in renal disease-formula (MDRD) only one of five BTP-based equations displayed a significantly higher accuracy within 30% of the measured GFR (84.6 vs. 59.6%; P=0.006). None of these equations showed a significant improvement compared with MDRD with respect to bias and precision. CONCLUSIONS: Beta-trace protein can be used as an alternative diagnostic tool to detect moderate or severe GFR reduction in patients after LT. Furthermore BTP-based equations are able to estimate GFR in LT recipients. However, these equations fail to perform constantly better than the MDRD formula.

Validation of the CKD-EPI formula in patients after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Accurate calculation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial in the management of patients after kidney transplantation (KTx). Recently, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula was introduced to estimate GFR in chronic kidney disease patients. However, to date the diagnostic value of this equation remains to be determined in patients after KTx. METHODS: We analysed the CKD-EPI formula in comparison to the re-expressed Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation in 170 stable patients after renal transplantation. Correlation, bias, precision and accuracy within 30 and 50% of true GFR were determined. GFR was measured by technetium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid clearance [39.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 37.3-42.0 mL/min/1.73m(2)]. RESULTS: The results for the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations correlated well with GFR (0.82; 0.83, respectively). GFR calculated by MDRD (44.1, 95% CI: 41.6-46.8 mL/min/1.73m(2)) and CKD-EPI (47.7, 95% CI: 44.7-50.7 mL/min/1.73m(2)) overestimated true GFR significantly (P < 0.001). Precision was not significantly different between MDRD and CKD-EPI (10.9 versus 10.0 mL/min/1.73m(2), respectively). Accuracy within 30% of true GFR was significantly higher for MDRD (71.8%) than for CKD-EPI (64.1%, P = 0.0014). Accuracy within 50% of true GFR did not differ significantly (MDRD: 89.4% versus CKD-EPI: 84.7%, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The new CKD-EPI formula did not improve the estimation of GFR in Caucasian patients after renal transplantation in this study.

Serum levels of beta-trace protein and its association to diuresis in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Beta-trace protein (BTP) has been proposed as an alternative endogenous marker of the glomerular filtration rate. However, possible determinants of BTP in ESRD patients undergoing regular renal replacement therapy have not been evaluated. METHODS: Serum levels of BTP, beta-2-microglobulin, creatinine and urea were analysed before and after dialysis treatment in 73 patients [haemodialysis (HD) n=52; haemodiafiltration (HDF) n=21]. Patients were categorized into four groups with residual diuresis (RD)<0.5 l/day (group 1; n=24), 0.5-1 l/day (group 2; n=18), 1.1-1.5 l/day (group 3; n=12) and >1.5 l/day (group 4; n=19). Subsequently RD was compared to pre-treatment levels of BTP. RESULTS: HD treatment did not affect BTP serum levels [pre-treatment 8.1+/-4.1 mg/l (mean+SD) vs post-treatment 7.7+/-4.1 mg/l; -0.6 +/- 16.1%; ns]. However, in 6 out of 21 patients undergoing HDF BTP levels were reduced by more than 20%. Overall, the resulting decrease in serum concentration was minuscule (9.6+/-6.2 vs 8.3+/-4.9 mg/l; -14+/-21.9%; P=0.03). BTP serum levels were tightly associated to RD of the four groups. Comparison of BTP levels showed significant differences between patients of groups 1 vs 3 and 4 as well as 2 vs 4. CONCLUSIONS: BTP serum levels may serve as a surrogate marker for residual renal function since HD and HDF do not exert clinical relevant alterations on them. Furthermore, BTP serum concentrations appear strongly associated to RD.

Can modifications of the MDRD formula improve the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in renal allograft recipients?

BACKGROUND: Two modifications of the MDRD equation [the Mayo Clinic (MC) equation and Rule's refitted (RR) MDRD formula] were proposed to overcome disadvantages of the original MDRD formula to calculate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Additionally, a correction factor for the original MDRD formula has been introduced to adapt this formula to creatinine values measured by the isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) method. Although precise determination of GFR is of central importance in renal transplant recipients, these equations have not been tested in these patients so far. METHODS: Considering the impact of different creatinine calibrations, we analysed the MC equation and the RR-MDRD formula in comparison with the old as well as the re-expressed (IDMS traceable) MDRD equation and the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) formula in 126 consecutive patients after kidney transplantation with respect to correlation, bias, precision, accuracy and ROC analysis. GFR was determined as technetium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA-clearance). RESULTS: After adjustment to IDMS creatinine determination, the performance of the re-expressed MDRD formula improved considerably in comparison to the original MDRD equation. In comparison with the re-expressed MDRD formula bias of the MC formula and the RR-MDRD formula were significantly smaller (2.31 and -0.35 vs 3.82 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). However, precision and correlation of these formulae did not differ significantly from one another, but all equations showed a higher precision than the C-G formula (P < or = 0.006 each). The accuracies within 30% of true GFR of the MC (79.4%) and the RR-MDRD equation (84.9%) were significantly higher than those of the re-expressed MDRD formula (72.2%; P < 0.03). CONCLUSION: In comparison to the original and the re-expressed MDRD formula, calculation of GFR by the MC equation and the RR-MDRD formula led to improved diagnostic performance in renal transplant recipients after adjustment of creatinine. In quotidian work both formulae can be applied to these patients. Nonetheless, to determine GFR exactly, gold standard techniques are mandatory.

Estimation of glomerular filtration rates after orthotopic liver transplantation: Evaluation of cystatin C-based equations.

Early detection of renal dysfunction in patients after orthotopic liver transplantation is important. Creatinine-based equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were found to be less accurate in liver transplant recipients than in their original populations. Since cystatin C (CysC) is independent from muscle mass and hepatic biosynthesis, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 3 CysC-based equations (Larson, Hoek, and Filler formulae) that are based on the same CysC method as that of our center in comparison to the abbreviated creatinine-based modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula in 59 liver transplant recipients. "True GFR" was measured by 99mTc-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) clearance. Neither correlation with the GFR (correlation coefficients: 0.594-0.640) nor precision (root mean square error: 15.7-18.17 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) differed significantly between the tested formulae. The biases of the Hoek and Larsson formulae were significantly smaller than those of the MDRD and Filler equations (-0.1 and -2.3 vs. 10.1 and 7.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively; P

Prediction of glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant recipients: cystatin C or modification of diet in renal disease equation?

BACKGROUND: To overcome disadvantages of serum creatinine two strategies have been suggested to identify patients with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR). On the one hand, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation is now recommended to classify the stage of chronic kidney disease. On the other hand, cystatin C (Cys C) has been investigated in numerous studies, finding a higher sensitivity than creatinine in detecting diminished GFR. To date, no comparison of both strategies in patients after renal transplantation has been performed. METHODS: One hundred and five consecutive renal transplant recipients underwent (99m)Tc-DTPA-- clearance measurement. Simultaneously, MDRD estimates were calculated and Cys C serum levels were determined. ROC analyses were performed at different decision points from 20 to 70 mL/min/1.73 m(2). RESULTS: Although the area under the curve did not differ significantly between MDRD and Cys C within the tested GFR range, the AUC for Cys C tended to be higher when GFR exceeded 55 mL/min/1.73 m(2). A significantly higher diagnostic accuracy for Cys C compared with MDRD (p = 0.045 at 65 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) was found when investigating the subgroup of patients with well-functioning grafts (GFR>40 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). CONCLUSION: MDRD equation is equivalent to Cys C measurement in renal transplant recipients. As availability of MDRD is superior to Cys C, we recommend GFR estimation using the MDRD equation. Nevertheless, Cys C may serve as a confirmation test of high MDRD estimates in patients with well-functioning grafts because of superior accuracy in these patients.

MDRD equations for estimation of GFR in renal transplant recipients.

After renal transplantation monitoring and detection of slight-to-moderate changes in GFR is a prerequisite for an optimal patient management. Recently, several equations to estimate GFR were developed and verified in the MDRD study cohort. However, little is known about the application of the MDRD formulas in the setting of renal transplantation. We prospectively conducted a study of the GFR estimates of the Cockcroft and Gault (C&G), MDRD6-, MDRD7 and the abbreviated MDRD (aMDRD) with the true GFR as measured by (99m)Tc-DTPA clearance in 95 consecutive patients 6.5, 5.3-7.7 years (mean, 95% CI) after renal transplantation. On average the DTPA clearance was 37.4, 34.4-40.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2), which differed significantly from estimates of GFR by C&G (52.6, 48.3-56.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), MDRD7 (44.8, 40.7-49.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), MDRD6 (43.8, 39.9-47.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and aMDRD (46.6, 42.4-50.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Bias was lowest for MDRD6 (6.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and highest for C&G (15.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Precision was similar for MDRD7 and aMDRD (10.6 and 11.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) but significantly better for MDRD6 (8.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2); p < 0.035). Accuracy within 50% of real GFR was 55.8% for C&G, 83.2% for aMDRD, 87.4% for MDRD7 and 90.5% for MDRD6. MDRD equations perform significantly better than the commonly used C&G formula. Moreover, the MDRD6 equation provides the best diagnostic performance, and should therefore be preferred in renal transplant recipients.

Intravenous treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in patients on chronic hemodialysis--a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) can be performed with the oral application of vitamins. However, this therapy rarely normalizes total homocysteine (tHcy) levels. Frequently, a rebound is observed after the end of treatment. Currently, no data are available about intravenous combination therapy with folic acid, pyridoxine (B6), and cyanocobalamin (B12). METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study comprising 13 patients on chronic hemodialysis treatment (63.7+/-4.9 years; 6 female, 7 male) for 27 weeks. The patients received 10 mg folic acid and 100 mg pyridoxine intravenously (IV) after each dialysis plus 1000 microg vitamin B12 IV once a week for 9 weeks. Between weeks 10 and 18 the patients received 10 mg folic acid, 100 mg vitamin B6 once a week, and 1000 microg vitamin B12 bimonthly IV. RESULTS: The therapy regimen decreased tHcy concentration (baseline: 30.5+/-2.2 micromol/L) significantly to 17.4+/-1.2 micromol/L, 15.6+/-1.0 micromol/L, and 16.4+/-0.1 micromol/L after 3, 6, and 9 weeks, respectively (p<0.01 vs. baseline concentration). The maximum reduction (-47.5+/-3.3%) of tHcy concentration was measured after 6 weeks of therapy. During the following maintenance therapy, tHcy-levels did not increase and no rebound of tHcy was detected during follow-up (week 27:16.5+/-1.97 micromol/L). CONCLUSION: The concept of a short, high-dose induction therapy with intravenous folic acid, pyridoxine, cyanocobalamin, and a subsequent low-dose maintenance regimen is effective in the treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in patients with ESRD.

Time course of low molecular weight proteins in the early kidney transplantation period--influence of corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Cystatin C (Cys C) is an established new marker of renal function in patients with various renal diseases and in kidney transplantation. However, few data are available for the early post-transplantation period. METHODS: Twenty-two patients who underwent renal transplantation (RTx) were evaluated for the kinetics of Cys C from day 0 to 14 in relation to creatinine and beta-2 microglobulin (B2MG). Blood samples were obtained immediately before and after transplantation and on a daily basis thereafter. Serum levels before transplantation (100%) were used to calculate reduction ratios. RESULTS: The decrease of the analytes differed considerably: immediately after RTx Cys C declined by 27.3% (P < 0.01). However, after 3 days, on average, all patients showed a significant increase in Cys C levels (15+/-2.5%; P < 0.01). B2MG levels fell quickly by 55.4 and 73.8% after days 1 and 7, respectively, and remained stable thereafter. In contrast, creatinine did not decrease immediately after RTx but fell slowly by 67.5% at the end of the study. Prior to rejection, all analytes showed a similar behaviour. Rejection treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone induced a significant increase in Cys C (+22.8+/-7.9%, P < 0.05), while in parallel, creatinine and B2MG decreased (-12.9+/-3.4 and -8.4+/-6.89%). CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroid treatment for induction of immunosuppression or rejection therapy significantly induces Cys C, but decreases B2MG. Cys C and B2MG are not helpful in establishing the diagnosis of rejection earlier. Thus, our data indicate that Cys C and B2MG testing does not accurately reflect changes in the glomerular filtration rate early after transplantation.

Cholesterol metabolism in patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis.

Premature atherosclerosis is a major concern in patients on chronic dialysis and the identification of risk factors is important for preventive and interventional strategies. Other than the recognized atherogenic lipoprotein levels, little is known about overall cholesterol metabolism in patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) and the best therapeutic intervention is still being debated. Therefore, we investigated intestinal cholesterol absorption, cholesterol and bile acid synthesis, and non-cholesterol plasma sterols in eight patients on dialysis and compared the results to those of 16 healthy male controls matched for body mass index and dietary cholesterol intake. Total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides did not differ between the groups, but dialysis patients had a significantly lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level (39 +/- 11 mg/dL vs. 48 +/- 10 mg/dL, p < 0.045). However, fractional cholesterol absorption, was significantly lower in dialysis patients (42.8 +/- 10.9% vs. 53.4 +/- 11%, p < 0.035), whereas plasma plant sterol concentrations and their ratios to cholesterol did not differ. Bile acid and total cholesterol synthesis were lower in dialysis patients (40% and -25%, respectively), although the differences were not significant. In contrast, lathosterol and its ratio to cholesterol in plasma was significantly lower in dialysis patients (0.176 +/- 0.084 mg/dL vs. 0.251 +/- 0.102 mg/dL, p < 0.024 and 0.733 +/- 0.353 microg/mg vs. 1.172 +/- 0.407 microg/mg, p < 0.017, respectively), indicating reduced hepatic de novo cholesterol synthesis. It is concluded that reduced HDL cholesterol and reduced bile acid synthesis contributes to atherosclerosis pathogenesis in dialysis patients, whereas intestinal cholesterol absorption and hepatic cholesterol synthesis did not seem dominant in this process at this stage of disease. Consequently, treatment with bile acid binding resins could be preferable to treatment with cholesterol absorption and synthesis inhibitors.