Mature results of a randomized trial comparing two fractionation schedules of high dose rate endoluminal brachytherapy for the treatment of endobronchial tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of high dose rate endobronchial brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for the treatment of centrally located lung tumors, two different fractionation schedules were compared regarding local tumor response, side effects and survival. Mature retrospective results with longer follow-up and more patients were analyzed. Initial results were published by Huber et al. in 1995. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 142 patients with advanced, centrally located malignant tumors with preferential endoluminal growth were randomized to receive 4 fractions of 3.8 Gy (time interval: 1 week, n = 60, group I) or 2 fractions of 7.2 Gy (time interval: 3 weeks, n = 82, group II) endobronchial HDR-BT.Age, gender, tumor stage, Karnofsky Performance Score and histology were equally distributed between both groups. RESULTS: Local tumor response with 2 fractions of 7.2 Gy was significantly higher as compared to 4 fractions of 3.8 Gy (median 12 vs. 6 weeks; p ≤ 0.015). Median survival was similar in both groups (19 weeks in the 4 fractions group vs. 18 weeks in the 2 fractions group). Fatal hemoptysis was less frequent following irradiation with 2 × 7.2 Gy than with 4 × 3.8 Gy, although the difference did not achieve statistical significance (12.2% vs. 18.3%, respectively. p = 0,345). Patients presenting with squamous cell carcinoma were at higher risk of bleeding compared to other histology (21.9% vs. 9%, p = 0,035).Multivariate analysis with regard to overall survival, revealed histology (p = 0.02), Karnofsky Performance Score (p < 0.0001) and response to therapy (p < 0.0001) as significant prognostic factors. For patients showing complete response the median survival was 57 weeks, while for patients with progressive disease median survival time was 8 weeks, p < 0.0001.The KPS at the start of the treatment was significantly correlated with survival. Patients presenting with a KPS ≤ 60 at the start had a significantly (p = 0,032) shorter survival time (10 weeks) than patients with a KPS > 60 (29 weeks).Moreover, the Karnofsky Performance Score of most patients improved during therapy (p = 0,001), suggesting successful palliation of cancer associated symptoms.Multivariate analysis with regard to local tumor control found no significant factors. CONCLUSION: Endobronchial HDR-BT is an effective local treatment for advanced centrally located malignant tumors with endoluminal tumor growth. Local tumor response was significantly higher after HDR-BT with 2 × 7.2 Gy.

Late and very late catch-up after 90Sr/90Y beta-irradiation for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.

Since late vessel failure has been speculated as a significant limitation of vascular brachytherapy (VBT), we conducted a prospective clinical evaluation at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months follow-up after irradiation with (90)Sr/(90)Y for in-stent restenosis (ISR) regardless of the patient's symptomatic status. Complete five-year follow-up is reported for 104 consecutive patients. The cumulative rate of death was 13.5% (6 months: 0.96%; 12 months: 2.88%; 24 months: 4.81%; 36 months: 7.69%), of acute myocardial infarction 4.81% (2.88%; 4.81%; 4.81%; 4.81%), of late thrombotic occlusion 4.81% (3.85%; 4.81%; 4.81%; 4.81%), of target lesion revascularization (TLR) 27.9% (8.65%; 12.5%; 17.3%; 21.2%), of target vessel revascularization (TVR) 43.3% (12.5%; 19.2%; 22.1%; 29.8%), and of all major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) 61.5% (16.3%; 26.9%; 31.7%; 42.3%), respectively. Considered that the annual incidence of TVR after the first year following drug-eluting stenting for in-stent restenosis has been reported as approximately 3% per year, an incidence of 5.8% per year following VBT of our study population clearly indicates a more pronounced, delayed and, even in the fifth year after the index procedure, ongoing restenotic process following beta-irradiation of in-stent restenotic lesions associated with clinically relevant adverse cardiovascular events.

Study protocol of the German "Registry for the detection of late sequelae after radiotherapy in childhood and adolescence" (RiSK).

BACKGROUND: Late effects after radiotherapy in childhood and adolescence have mainly been characterized retrospectively with small patient numbers. However, these analyses are limited due to little information regarding organ dose levels in many cases. To overcome this limitation, the German Group of Paediatric Radiation Oncology (APRO) established the "Registry for the evaluation of late side effects after radiation in childhood and adolescence" (RiSK). The study protocol and the documentation forms are given in this publication. METHODS/DESIGN: Radiation parameters including detailed organ doses as well as toxicity evaluations are collected prospectively from centres all over Germany. Standardized documentation forms are used. These forms are given in an English and German version as additional files to this publication. Documentation is planned for all children who receive radiotherapy in one of the therapy trials of the "German Society of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology (GPOH)". The study started in a pilot phase in June 2001 in few centres. Since 2004 documentation has been performed all over Germany and is still on-going. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, "RiSK" is the only multi-centre study that evaluates radiation associated side effects prospectively with detailed information about organ dose levels. With ongoing recruitment and prolongation of follow-up powerful data will be obtained in a few years. A broad use and international cooperation are welcome.

Simultaneous chemoradiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone after induction chemotherapy in inoperable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: study CTRT99/97 by the Bronchial Carcinoma Therapy Group.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine whether, after preceding induction chemotherapy, simultaneous chemoradiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in inoperable stage IIIA or IIIB received induction chemotherapy with two cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the curve 6 every 3 weeks. Patients without progression at restaging after induction chemotherapy were randomly assigned to radiotherapy (60 Gy) or chemoradiotherapy (paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 weekly). The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were time to progression, response, and toxicity. RESULTS: Three hundred three patients entered the study, and 276 completed induction chemotherapy. Two hundred fourteen patients were randomly assigned (radiotherapy alone: n = 113; simultaneous chemoradiotherapy: n = 101). Median follow-up time of all randomly assigned patients was 13.6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6.4 to 29.0 months), and median follow-up time of the subgroup of censored patients (n = 52) was 37.4 months (IQR, 5.9 to 57.0 months; maximum, 76.1 months). Toxicities during the induction phase were mild. During radiotherapy, overall toxicity rates were not significantly different between the two arms. Median survival times in the radiotherapy group and chemoradiotherapy group were 14.1 months (95% CI, 11.8 to 16.3 months) and 18.7 months (95% CI, 14.1 to 23.3 months; difference not statistically significant, P = .091). Median time to progression significantly favored simultaneous chemoradiotherapy (11.5 months; 95% CI, 8.3 to 14.7 months) versus radiotherapy alone (6.3 months; 95% CI, 5.0 to 7.6 months; P < .001, log-rank test). CONCLUSION: Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy with weekly paclitaxel is feasible. Response, time to progression, and survival favor chemoradiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone.

[Therapy-associated late effects after irradiation of malignant diseases in childhood and adolescence. Feasibility analyses of a prospective multicenter register study]. / Behandlungsassoziierte Spätfolgen nach Strahlentherapie maligner Erkrankungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter : Machbarkeitsanalyse einer prospektiven multizentrischen Registerstudie.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiogenic late effects in children and adolescents have been evaluated retrospectively in most analyses, with small patient numbers. The German Group of Pediatric Radiation Oncology (APRO) has generated a concept for a prospective evaluation of radiation-associated late effects in childhood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a nationwide central database for the documentation of radiation parameters and side effects of all children treated within therapy protocols of the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A study center has been implemented in Muenster, the documentation has started in July 2001 in few centers in a pilot phase. Since February 2004 the documentation is done countrywide. Detailed documentation forms have been designed for treatment parameters and for doses applied at organs at risk. Furthermore, a uniform toxicity documentation, according to the RTOG/EORTC criteria, was chosen. Patients were reported from the study centers of the GPOH to the study center. All information was collected and analyzed in the study center. RESULTS: Till July 31, 2005, 438 documentations of radiation and 579 toxicity documentations of side effects have been collected in the study center. 46 centers for radiotherapy in Germany and one center each in Austria and in Switzerland took part in the documentation. The quality of documentation regarding completeness and plausibility fulfilled the expected criteria in most cases. This feasibility analysis showed that important information about organ dose levels and side effects was documented in a large number of patients (Figures 1 and 2). CONCLUSION: This prospective evaluation of radiotherapy and radiogenic side effects in children and adolescents will allow correlating doses at organs at risk and the incidence of acute and late sequelae in Germany. Further documentations and a longer follow-up are necessary to obtain powerful results.

Three-year clinical follow-up after strontium-90/yttrium-90 beta-irradiation for the treatment of in-stent coronary restenosis.

Because late vessel failure has been speculated as a possible limitation of vascular brachytherapy, we conducted a prospective clinical evaluation at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up after irradiation with strontium-90/yttrium-90 for in-stent restenosis, regardless of the patient's symptomatic status. We report complete 3-year follow-up data for 106 consecutive patients. The cumulative rate of death at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 0.9%, 0.9%, 0.9%, and 1.9% respectively. The corresponding rates for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction were 2.8%, 4.7%, 4.7%, and 4.7%, respectively. The cumulative rate of late thrombotic occlusion at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 3.8%, 4.7%, 4.7%, and 4.7%, respectively. The corresponding rates of target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization were 8.5% and 12.3% (p = 0.046), 14.2% (p = 0.157) and 18.0% (p = 0.046), 12.3% and 18.9% (p = 0.008), and 21.7% (p = 0.083) and 29.2% (p = 0.005), respectively. The cumulative rate of all major adverse cardiovascular events at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 16.1%, 24.5% (p = 0.003), 27.4% (p = 0.083), and 35.8% (p = 0.003), respectively. In conclusion, these results indicate a delayed and, even in the third year after the index procedure, continued restenotic process after beta irradiation of in-stent restenotic lesions.

Evolution of angiographic restenosis rate and late lumen loss after intracoronary beta radiation for in-stent restenotic lesions.

The aim of this study was to investigate the time course of angiographic restenosis rate and late loss after successful percutaneous coronary intervention and vascular brachytherapy with beta-irradiation using strontium-90/yttrium-90 in 98 patients who were prospectively enrolled into a quantitative angiographic and clinical follow-up protocol at 6, 12, and 24 months after the index procedure, regardless of their symptom status. Actuarial restenosis rates measured 11.2 +/- 5% at 6 months of follow-up, 24.5 +/- 5% at 12 months, and 28.5 +/- 6% at 24 months, respectively. Late loss of the stent segment during the first 6 months measured 0.38 +/- 0.40 mm (6 to 12 months: 0.25 +/- 0.38 mm; 12 to 24 months: 0.16 +/- 0.32 mm), of the injured segment 0.27 +/- 0.21 mm (6 to 12 months: 0.21 +/- 0.26 mm; 12 to 24 months: 0.13 +/- 0.24 mm), of the irradiated segment 0.18 +/- 0.29 mm (6 to 12 months: 0.19 +/- 0.31 mm; 12 to 24 months: 0.11 +/- 0.27 mm), and of the analysis segment 0.18 +/- 0.36 mm (6 to 12 months: 0.17 +/- 0.29 mm; 12 to 24 months: 0.11 +/- 0.20 mm). Restenosis after angioplasty and beta-irradiation of in-stent restenotic lesions is not complete within 6 months but is sustained with a gradual decrease over 24 months.

Impact of barotrauma on acute and late angiographic and clinical outcomes following angioplasty and beta-irradiation of coronary in-stent restenotic lesions.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the impact of different degrees of vessel barotrauma on the acute and 1-year clinical and angiographic outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and adjunctive vascular brachytherapy (VBT) with 90Sr/90Y for in-stent restenotic lesions (ISR) in 118 patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty consecutive patients were treated according to an aggressive PCI strategy (group 1); fifty-eight were treated non-aggressively (group 2). Irradiation was performed with a manual afterloader. Clinical and angiographic baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. Group 1 yielded a higher acute lumen gain (2.3 +/- 1.2 mm versus 1.7 +/- 1.3 mm; p=0.005) and a higher prevalence of additional stent implantation (48.3% versus 22.4%; p=0.003). At follow-up, net gain (1.8 +/- 0.7 mm versus 1.4 +/- 0.8 mm; p=0.102) was equalized by a higher late loss in group 1 (0.6 +/- 0.8 mm versus 0.3 +/- 0.7 mm; p=0.036). Remaining target vessel late loss, due to edge effects, was considerably higher in group 1 than in group 2 (0.5 +/- 0.8 mm versus 0.2 +/- 0.5 mm; p<0.001), leading to a higher rate of binary angiographic restenosis (23.3% versus 6.9%; p=0.013) and target vessel revascularization (16.7% versus 5.2%; p=0.046). After excluding patients who received additional stents, the angiographic differences between groups were attenuated. CONCLUSION: Our study does not support the use of oversized balloons and high inflation pressures for the treatment of ISR when combined with VBT. Additional stent implantation combined with VBT carries a high risk of repeat revascularization in the setting of ISR and should be avoided.

Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis after intracoronary beta-radiation in long in-stent restenotic lesions.

In-stent restenosis (ISR) represents the major limitation of stent implantation. Treatment, although of relative technical ease, is unsatisfactory due to the high incidence of recurrent restenosis. Long ISR lesions are especially prone to restenosis. Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) has emerged as a powerful adjunct therapeutic modality to treat ISR. However, VBT may be less effective in very long, diffuse ISR lesions. The present study investigated serial changes of the extent and distribution of neointima formation after beta-radiation as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Following interventional procedures of long ISR in 30 patients, a 40 mm or 60 mm non-centered 90Sr/90Y seed train was used for VBT. Serial (post radiation (PR) and follow-up (FU)) quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) measurements of minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and late lumen loss (LLL) and intravascular ultrasound measurements (IVUS) of cross-sectional areas of the lumen (L-CSA), stent (S-CSA) and intimal hyperplasia (IH-CSA) were performed and compared with historic controls. LLL (0.34 +/- 0.27 mm; p = 0.196), mean decrease of L-CSA (-1.0 +/- 0.8 mm2; p = 0.024) and mean increase of IH-CSA (0.5 +/- 1.3 mm2; p = 0.038) in long ISR were comparable with previously reported results of short ISR. In conclusion the average changes of lumen and intimal hyperplasia after beta-radiation of long ISR are similar to those of short ISR.