Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Neurosci ; 124(9): 652-6, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24392812

RESUMO

This detailed medical charts' data collection study conducted at a multiple sclerosis (MS) clinic in Germany evaluated the effectiveness of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)/cannabidiol (CBD) oromucosal spray in patients with resistant MS spasticity. Over a 15-month timeframe, THC:CBD spray was initiated in 166 patients. Mean follow-up was 9 months. In all, 120 patients remained on treatment for a response rate of 72%. THC:CBD spray was used as add-on therapy in 95 patients and as monotherapy in 25 patients to achieve best-possible therapeutic results. Among responders, the mean spasticity 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) score decreased by 57%, from 7.0 before treatment to 3.0 within 10 days of starting THC:CBD spray. The mean dosage was 4 sprays/day. Most patients who withdrew from treatment (40/46) had been receiving THC:CBD spray for less than 60 days. Main reasons for treatment discontinuation were: adverse drug reactions, mainly dizziness, fatigue and oral discomfort (23 patients; 13.9%); lack of efficacy (14 patients; 8.4%); or need for a baclofen pump (9 patients; 5.4%). No new safety signals were noted with THC:CBD spray during the evaluation period. In this routine clinical practice setting at an MS clinic in Germany, THC:CBD spray was effective and well tolerated as add-on therapy or as monotherapy in a relevant proportion of patients with resistant MS spasticity.


Assuntos
Canabidiol/uso terapêutico , Dronabinol/uso terapêutico , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Espasticidade Muscular/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla/complicações , Espasticidade Muscular/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Neurol ; 257(3): 322-7, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19756822

RESUMO

A prospective examiner-blind, cross-over study was conducted to compare the efficacy of memantine (40 or 60 mg/day) and gabapentin (1,200 mg/day) as therapy for acquired fixational pendular nystagmus (APN) in 11 patients with multiple sclerosis. APN was documented in 20 eyes by electrooculography (EOG). The primary objective of the study was an at least 50% reduction in amplitude and/or frequency of APN compared with baseline values in EOG. This aim was reached for 17 of 20 APN-affected eyes with memantine 40-60 mg and for 11 eyes with gabapentin up to 1,200 mg. A complete cessation of APN was achieved in eight eyes (four patients) with memantine 40 mg and in a further four eyes (two patients) with memantine 60 mg. One patient achieved the same benefit with memantine 40 mg and gabapentin. In two other eyes APN completely subsided with gabapentin 1,200 mg only, but not with memantine. Near visual acuity, a secondary outcome parameter, improved by at least 0.1 in 11 of 17 eyes treated with memantine and in 8 out of 16 eyes treated with gabapentin. In summary, memantine and gabapentin are safe and effective treatment options for APN.


Assuntos
Aminas/administração & dosagem , Ácidos Cicloexanocarboxílicos/administração & dosagem , Memantina/administração & dosagem , Esclerose Múltipla/complicações , Nistagmo Patológico/tratamento farmacológico , Nistagmo Patológico/etiologia , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Aminas/efeitos adversos , Tronco Encefálico/efeitos dos fármacos , Tronco Encefálico/fisiopatologia , Protocolos Clínicos , Estudos Cross-Over , Ácidos Cicloexanocarboxílicos/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitatórios/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitatórios/efeitos adversos , Movimentos Oculares/efeitos dos fármacos , Movimentos Oculares/fisiologia , Feminino , Gabapentina , Humanos , Masculino , Memantina/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vias Neurais/efeitos dos fármacos , Vias Neurais/fisiopatologia , Nistagmo Patológico/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem , Ácido gama-Aminobutírico/efeitos adversos
3.
J Rehabil Med ; 41(8): 674-80, 2009 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19565162

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether functional electrical stimulation-supported ergometric training of patients with multiple sclerosis has a prosthetic or therapeutic effect on biomechanical (power, smoothness of cycling) and functional outcomes (walking capability, strength of muscle, spasticity). DESIGN: Twelve subjects with multiple sclerosis participated in an electrical stimulation-supported ergometric training (3 sessions/week for 2 weeks). Measurements were made in a cross-over design to study prosthetic (with and without stimulation) and therapeutic effects (before and after training). METHODS: Power and smoothness were calculated by cadence and torque recordings of cycling and spasticity; strength and walking capability were measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale, Manual Muscle Test, and 10-Metre Walk Test. RESULTS: The power and smoothness of pedalling significantly improved prosthetically with electrical stimulation (p=0.02), but did not show significant improvement over the 2 weeks of training. Significant short-term reductions in spasticity (before vs after training session; p<0.05) were found. Isometric strength did not increase significantly during the 2-week training period and there was no improvement in walking ability. CONCLUSION: Patients with multiple sclerosis are able to improve their cycling power and smoothness by pedalling with stimulation. We suggest that severely affected patients benefit more from functional electric stimulation-cycling therapy than do slightly affected patients.


Assuntos
Ciclismo , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Esclerose Múltipla/reabilitação , Adulto , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Estudos Cross-Over , Ergometria , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla/fisiopatologia , Espasticidade Muscular/fisiopatologia , Espasticidade Muscular/reabilitação , Força Muscular/fisiologia , Projetos Piloto , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 106(20): 8302-7, 2009 May 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19416878

RESUMO

Gray matter pathology is increasingly recognized as an important feature of multiple sclerosis (MS), but the nature of the immune response that targets the gray matter is poorly understood. Starting with a proteomics approach, we identified contactin-2/transiently expressed axonal glycoprotein 1 (TAG-1) as a candidate autoantigen recognized by both autoantibodies and T helper (Th) 1/Th17 T cells in MS patients. Contactin-2 and its rat homologue, TAG-1, are expressed by various neuronal populations and sequestered in the juxtaparanodal domain of myelinated axons both at the axonal and myelin sides. The pathogenic significance of these autoimmune responses was then explored in experimental autoimmune encephalitis models in the rat. Adoptive transfer of TAG-1-specific T cells induced encephalitis characterized by a preferential inflammation of gray matter of the spinal cord and cortex. Cotransfer of TAG-1-specific T cells with a myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-specific mAb generated focal perivascular demyelinating lesions in the cortex and extensive demyelination in spinal cord gray and white matter. This study identifies contactin-2 as an autoantigen targeted by T cells and autoantibodies in MS. Our findings suggest that a contactin-2-specific T-cell response contributes to the development of gray matter pathology.


Assuntos
Autoantígenos , Autoimunidade , Moléculas de Adesão Celular Neuronais/imunologia , Esclerose Múltipla/imunologia , Fibras Nervosas Amielínicas/patologia , Transferência Adotiva , Animais , Contactina 2 , Encefalomielite Autoimune Experimental/imunologia , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/etiologia , Ratos , Linfócitos T/transplante
5.
CNS Drugs ; 22(4): 291-324, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18336059

RESUMO

While pain is a common problem in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), it is not frequently mentioned by patients and a more direct approach is required in order to obtain information about pain from patients. Many patients with MS experience more than one pain syndrome; combinations of dysaesthesia, headaches and/or back or muscle and joint pain are frequent. For each pain syndrome a clear diagnosis and therapeutic concept needs to be established. Pain in MS can be classified into four diagnostically and therapeutically relevant categories: (i) neuropathic pain due to MS (pain directly related to MS); (ii) pain indirectly related to MS; (iii) MS treatment-related pain; and (iv) pain unrelated to MS. Painful paroxysmal symptoms such as trigeminal neuralgia (TN), or painful tonic spasms are treated with antiepileptics as first choice, e.g. carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, gabapentin, pregabalin, etc. Painful 'burning' dysaesthesias, the most frequent chronic pain syndrome, are treated with TCAs such as amitriptyline, or antiepileptics such as gabapentin, pregabalin, lamotrigine, etc. Combinations of drugs with different modes of action can be particularly useful for reducing adverse effects. While escalation therapy may require opioids, there are encouraging results from studies regarding cannabinoids, but their future role in the treatment of MS-related pain has still to be determined. Pain related to spasticity often improves with adequate physiotherapy. Drug treatment includes antispastic agents such as baclofen or tizanidine and in patients with phasic spasticity, gabapentin or levetiracetam are administered. In patients with severe spasticity, botulinum toxin injections or intrathecal baclofen merit consideration. While physiotherapy may ameliorate malposition-induced joint and muscle pain, additional drug treatment with paracetamol (acetaminophen) or NSAIDs may be useful. Moreover, painful pressure lesions should be avoided by using optimally adjusted aids. Treatment-related pain associated with MS can occur with subcutaneous injections of interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate, and may be reduced by optimizing the injection technique and by local cooling. Systemic (particularly 'flu-like') adverse effects of interferons, e.g. myalgias, can be reduced by administering paracetamol, ibuprofen or naproxen. A potential increase in the frequency of pre-existing headaches after starting treatment with interferons may require optimization of headache attack therapy or even prophylactic treatment. Pain unrelated to MS, such as back pain or headache, is common in patients with MS and may deteriorate as a result of the disease. In summary, a careful analysis of each pain syndrome will allow the design of the appropriate treatment plan using various medical and nonmedical options (multimodal therapy), and will thus help to improve the quality of life (QOL) of the patients.


Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla/complicações , Manejo da Dor , Dor/etiologia , Humanos , Medição da Dor
6.
Arthritis Rheum ; 56(8): 2774-83, 2007 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17665448

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) is an autosomal-dominantly inherited autoinflammatory disorder caused by mutations in the TNFRSF1A gene. It is characterized by episodes of autoinflammation usually associated with fever, abdominal pain, myalgia, exanthema, arthralgia/arthritis, and ocular involvement. We undertook this study to investigate the prevalence of TRAPS in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who reported, in addition to their neurologic symptoms, at least 2 other symptoms compatible with TRAPS. METHODS: Twenty-five unrelated MS patients were prospectively screened for TNFRSF1A mutations. In addition, blood samples from 365 unrelated MS patients and 407 unrelated Caucasian controls were analyzed to determine the R92Q carrier frequency. RESULTS: Six of 25 adult MS patients (24%) with symptoms suggestive of TRAPS were found to carry the identical arginine-to-glutamine substitution at amino acid position 92 (R92Q or p.Arg121Gln) encoded by exon 4 of the TNFRSF1A gene. All R92Q heterozygotes had similar symptoms, including arthralgias/arthritis, myalgias, urticarial rash, and severe fatigue, which began before the onset of MS. In 5 of the 6 patients, we could identify family members who had TRAPS symptoms and had inherited the identical mutation. The R92Q exchange was also detected in 17 of 365 unselected MS patients (4.66%) and in 12 of 407 controls (2.95%) (P = 0.112). Three patients were heterozygous carriers of MEFV variants, in 1 patient in combination with the R92Q mutation. CONCLUSION: Autoinflammatory syndromes and especially late-onset TRAPS should be considered in MS patients who report symptoms such as arthralgias/arthritis, myalgias, urticarial rash, and severe fatigue.


Assuntos
Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Esclerose Múltipla/genética , Mutação , Receptores Tipo I de Fatores de Necrose Tumoral/genética , Adulto , Arginina/química , Arginina/genética , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/complicações , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/metabolismo , Febre Familiar do Mediterrâneo/patologia , Feminino , Testes Genéticos , Glutamina/química , Glutamina/genética , Heterozigoto , Humanos , Hipergamaglobulinemia/genética , Hipergamaglobulinemia/metabolismo , Hipergamaglobulinemia/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla/complicações , Esclerose Múltipla/metabolismo , Esclerose Múltipla/patologia , Linhagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Receptores Tipo I de Fatores de Necrose Tumoral/química , Receptores Tipo I de Fatores de Necrose Tumoral/metabolismo
7.
MMW Fortschr Med ; 149 Suppl 2: 61-4, 2007 May 21.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17724970

RESUMO

Headaches are among the most frequently named symptoms in general practices. About 90% of the patients suffer from idiopathic headaches, for example, migraine or tension headaches, which are treated according to guidelines. An acute headache can however also be a symptom of a serious primary disease, such as subarachnoidal haemorrhage, arterial dissection, cerebral infarction, cerebral venous thrombosis or acute glaucoma. Patients with suspected symptomatic headaches must be immediately referred to a specialist or hospital for further diagnosis and therapy.


Assuntos
Cefaleia , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Isquemia Encefálica/complicações , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Emergências , Feminino , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Cefaleia/etiologia , Cefaleia/terapia , Hematoma Subdural/complicações , Hematoma Subdural/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Horner/complicações , Hospitalização , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Trombose dos Seios Intracranianos/complicações , Trombose dos Seios Intracranianos/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/complicações , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
8.
Neurology ; 66(2): 275-7, 2006 Jan 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16434675

RESUMO

During the first 6 months of glatiramer acetate therapy in 82 consecutive patients with multiple sclerosis, in only 6% frequency of pre-existing headaches increased by more than 50%. This is less than the headache aggravation reported in an earlier study in up to 35% of patients during the first 6 months on interferon beta.


Assuntos
Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Cefaleia/etiologia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Esclerose Múltipla/complicações , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Peptídeos/uso terapêutico , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Feminino , Acetato de Glatiramer , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Interferon beta/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peptídeos/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...