Community DOT for tuberculosis in a Brazilian favela: comparison with a clinic model.

SETTING: Rio de Janeiro City, Brazil. OBJECTIVE: To compare community-based directly observed treatment (DOT) for tuberculosis (TB), using community health workers (CHWs), with clinic-based DOT. DESIGN: In a longitudinal study in a cohort of TB patients in a region of Rio de Janeiro city, we evaluated treatment modalities and outcomes in 1811 patients diagnosed with TB between 1 January 2003 and 30 December 2004. Patients were offered DOT when they presented to out-patient clinics for an initial diagnosis. DOT was provided in the clinic or in the community, using CHWs, for patients living in a large favela. Outcomes of treatment were assessed using treatment registry databases. RESULTS: Of the 1811 TB patients, 1215 (67%) were treated under DOT; among these, 726 (60%) received clinic-based treatment and 489 (40%) community-based treatment. Patients offered community-based treatment were more likely to accept DOT (99%) than those offered clinic-based treatment (60%, P<0.001). Treatment success rates for new smear-positive and retreatment TB cases were significantly higher among those treated with community-based DOT compared to clinic-based DOT. CONCLUSION: We conclude that using CHWs to deliver DOT in the community may improve TB treatment outcomes in selected areas such as urban slums.

Improvements in treatment success rates with directly observed therapy in Rio de Janeiro City.

SETTING: Rio de Janeiro City, Brazil. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of directly observed therapy (DOT) on treatment success, by comparing the treatment success rates between patients treated under DOT with those who received self-administered therapy (SAT). DESIGN: A longitudinal study in a cohort of tuberculosis (TB) patients. Of 9929 new pulmonary TB cases, 1190 (12%) were treated under DOT and 8739 (88%) under SAT. All patients received a three-drug regimen consisting of rifampicin (RMP), isoniazid (INH) and pyrazinamide for 2 months followed by 4 months of RMP and INH. RESULTS: Patients under DOT were more likely to convert to sputum-negative at the end of the second month than those treated under SAT (86.3% vs. 61.9%, P < 0.001). DOT alone was significantly associated with successful treatment (OR 1.6, 95%CI 1.37-1.86, P < 0.001), even when controlled by sex, age and positive smear or culture at enrollment (OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.33-1.82, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This pilot DOTS implementation phase showed that DOT is highly effective and feasible in a large urban centre of a developing country.