Point of Care Testing (POCT) to assess drug concentration in patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs).

BACKGROUND: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) do not need routine laboratory monitoring but measurement of drug concentration is important in emergency conditions. Specific laboratory tests are not readily available or not implemented in every hospital. Point-of-Care Tests (POCT) may bridge this gap and be used as a bedside solution. OBJECTIVES: Feasibility of POCT to assess plasma levels of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban. PATIENTS/METHODS: Activated Coagulation Time-Low Range (ACT - LR) using a portable Hemochron Signature Elite for dabigatran and prothrombin time (expressed as INR) by Coaguchek XS Pro for rivaroxaban and apixaban were obtained at trough and peak in 136 consecutive patients taking NOACs (70 on dabigatran, 45 on rivaroxaban and 20 on apixaban). Using a paired study design, drug concentrations were concurrently determined by functional specific tests. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between NOACs concentration and the values obtained using the POCTs was high for dabigatran and rivaroxaban (r = 0.80 and r = 0.82, respectively) and low for apixaban (r = 0.21). ACT-LR ≤ 188 s better detected dabigatran levels ≤ 50 ng/ml, with a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 84.1%. ACT-LR values > 217 s better discriminated value of dabigatran > 200 ng/ml, with a sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 81.4%. INR Coaguchek values ≤ 1.2 better identified patients with rivaroxaban values < 100 ng/ml, with sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 88.5%. This analysis was not possible for apixaban. CONCLUSION: In emergency situations POCT use may provide useful immediate information on dabigatran and rivaroxaban concentration.

APS - Diagnostics and challenges for the future.

Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is essentially based on the detection of circulating antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies. Progress have been made on the standardization of tests exploring the presence of aPL as guidelines on coagulation and immunological tests were recently published in the literature. Clinical relevance of aPL profile has come from prospective cohort studies in populations with a homogeneous antibody profile supporting the view that triple positivity is a high risk pattern in patients and carriers. In addition to the classic ones, several other tests have been proposed for the diagnosis of APS. The detection of antibodies directed to domain 1 and 4/5 of ß2-Glycoprotein I (ß2GP1) were found to be particularly sound. Several issues remain to be addressed. We do not yet know what is the physiological function of ß2GP1 and the pathophysiology of thrombosis and pregnancy loss in these patients. Moreover, treatment is poorly defined especially in the case of feared catastrophic APS.

Laboratory testing for antiphospholipid syndrome.

This is a practical report on laboratory tests for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). After a general definition of APS, this study deals with appropriateness and timing in requesting the determination of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies. Lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti ß2-glycoprotein I (aßGPI) are the mandatory tests to be performed, while other tests are not yet validated for clinical use. Interpretation of results is an important discussed issue that implies a close liaison between clinical pathologists and clinicians. Finally, a personal definition of APS according to aPL antibody profile closes the manuscript.

Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: Rationale and design of the Trial on Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome (TRAPS) trial.

BACKGROUND: New oral anticoagulants may simplify long-term therapy in conditions requiring anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been extensively studied and is now approved for the prevention and therapy of a number of thromboembolic conditions. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: This is a multicentre, randomized, open-label, study that will evaluate if Rivaroxaban 20 mg od (or 15 mg od in patients with moderate renal insufficiency) is non-inferior to warfarin (INR target 2.5), for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding and death in high risk (triple positive) patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Secondary endpoints will assess the incidence of any individual component of the composite end point. An external adjudication committee will evaluate all suspected outcome events. This will be a unique trial, as it will enrol the biggest homogenous cohort of high risk APS individuals. CONCLUSION: The methods and the study design should be appropriate to achieve study results that are both scientifically valid and relevant to clinical practice.

Antibodies to Domain 4/5 (Dm4/5) of ß2-Glycoprotein 1 (ß2GP1) in different antiphospholipid (aPL) antibody profiles.

BACKGROUND: Determination of the three recommended tests for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome [Lupus Anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti ß2-Glycoprotein 1 (aß2GP1) antibodies] allow physicians to allocate patients into classification (risk) categories. OBJECTIVES: To measure antibodies of IgG isotype directed towards Domain 4/5 (Dm4/5) of ß2GP1. PATIENTS/METHODS: In this cross-sectional study we measured IgG aß2GP1-Dm4/5 in a group of individuals positive for IgG aß2GP1 and classified as triple (LAC+, IgG aCL+, IgG aß2GP1+, n=32), double (LAC-, IgG aCL+, IgG aß2GP1+, n=23) or single positive (LA-, IgG aCL-, IgG aß2GP1+, n=10). RESULTS: Geometric mean and standard deviation of IgG aß2GP1 values expressed as Chemiluminescent Units (CU) in triple, double, single positive groups and in 40 healthy individuals were 1795±783, 321±181, 29±8 and 5.0±1.0, respectively (ANOVA p<0.0001). Geometric mean and standard deviation of IgG aß2GP1-Dm4/5 expressed as Optical Density (OD) in triple, double and single positive groups and in 40 healthy individuals were 0.16±0.13, 0.16±0.15 and 0.26±0.15, 0.13±0,11, respectively (ANOVA p<0.002). Individuals in the single positive group, expressed significantly higher values with respect to triple (p=0.04) and double (p=0.03) positive groups. Approximate OD cut-off value (99° percentile) calculated in 40 normal control subjects is 0.404. Positivity to IgG aß2GP1-Dm4/5 according to this cutoff was found in only 5 individuals, 3 in triple positive and 2 in single positive groups and was not associated with thromboembolism. CONCLUSION: Mean level of IgG aß2GP1-Dm4/5 is higher in single positive group. There is no association between positivity to IgG aß2GP1-Dm4/5 and thromboembolic events.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: antibodies to Domain 1 of ß2-glycoprotein 1 correctly classify patients at risk.

BACKGROUND: Determination of lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and ß2-Glycoprotein 1 (aß2GP1) antibodies is mandatory to classify patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) into risk categories. OBJECTIVES: To measure relevant antibodies, considered to be those of the IgG isotype directed towards ß2GP1 and particularly those directed to Domain 1 (Dm1) of the molecule. PATIENTS/METHODS: In this cross-sectional study we measured IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 by a chemiluminescent immunoassay in a group of individuals initially positive for IgG aß2GP1 and classified as triple (LAC+, IgG aCL+, IgG aß2GP1+, n = 32), double (LAC-, IgG aCL+, IgG aß2GP1+, n = 23) or single positive (LA-, IgG aCL-, IgG aß2GP1+, n = 10). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Geometric mean and standard deviation expressed as chemiluminescent units (CU) in triple, double and single positive groups were 273.0 ± 6.2, 18.2 ± 9.6 and 4.4 ± 2.2, respectively. The geometric mean obtained in 40 healthy subjects was 2.0 ± 2.0. Mean CU values were significantly different among groups and with respect to values found in 40 healthy subjects (P < 0.0001). Positive values of IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 (above 14.2 CU) were found in 45 individuals while 20 individuals (20/65 = 30.8%) positive for IgG aß2GP1 were negative for IgG aß2GPI-Dm1. There was a significant association between positive IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 and thromboembolic events (P = 0.001). Positive and negative values of IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 were consistently confirmed after 12 weeks, with only three low positive values being negative after 12 weeks. In conclusion, IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 seems a robust and reproducible test that in association with the classic tests may be useful in clinical practice in identifying individuals at high risk of developing thromboembolic events.

Confirmation of initial antiphospholipid antibody positivity depends on the antiphospholipid antibody profile.

BACKGROUND: The revised classification criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome state that antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LAC] and/or anticardiolipin [aCL] and/or anti-ß2 -glycoprotein I [aß2 GPI] antibodies) should be detected on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. Consequently, classification of patient risk and adequacy of treatment may be deferred by 3 months. OBJECTIVES: In order to early classify patient risk, we evaluated whether aPL positivity confirmation is related to aPL antibody profiles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to our center who were initially positive in one or more tests exploring the presence of aPL were tested after 3 months. During a 4-year period, 225 patients were initially positive in one or more tests, and 161 were available for confirmation after 3 months. Patients were classified as triple-positive (n = 54: LAC(+) , aCL(+) , aß2 GPI(+) , same isotype), double-positive (n = 50: LAC(-) , aCL(+) , aß2 GPI(+) , same isotype) and single-positive (n = 53: LAC or aCL or aß2 GPI antibodies as the sole positive test). RESULTS: Among subjects with triple positivity at initial testing, 98% (53 of 54) had their aPL profile confirmed after 12 weeks. The double-positive and single-positive groups had data confirmed in 42 of 50 (84%) and 23 of 57 (40%) subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that high-risk subjects with triple-positive aPL profiles are identified early, at the time of the initial screening tests.

Major bleeding in patients undergoing PCI and triple or dual antithrombotic therapy: a parallel-cohort study.

The combination of oral anticoagulants with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation (PCI-stenting) is subject to controversy due to the high risk of bleeding. In this multicenter retrospective parallel-group study, we compared the rate of adverse events in chronically anticoagulated patients who underwent PCI-stenting and were discharged on aspirin, clopidogrel and warfarin (triple antithrombotic therapy [TT] group) and were followed in Italian anticoagulation centers, with a parallel cohort of patients who underwent PCI-stenting and were discharged on DAT group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major bleeding while the patients were in TT and DAT. A secondary endpoint was the occurrence of major ischemic adverse events (MACEs). The final cohort consisted of 229 TT patients and 231 DAT patients followed up for 6 and 7 months, respectively. There were 11 (4.8%; 9.1% patient/years) major bleeding events in the TT group (1 was fatal) as compared to 1 (0.4%; 0.7% patient/years) event in the DAT group (p = 0.003). Of the 28 (6.1%) MACE recorded during the follow-up, 12 (5.2%) occurred in the TT group and 16 (6.9%) in the DAT group. In conclusion, despite close monitoring of anticoagulated patients in dedicated centers, the major bleeding incidence remains high among unselected patients undergoing PCI-stenting and treated with TT. Any efforts to minimize these events should be pursued.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: critical analysis of the diagnostic path.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed in the presence of vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity occurring in patients with circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LA] and/or IgG/IgM anticardiolipin [aCL] and/or IgG/IgM anti-beta2glycoprotein I [abeta2GPI] antibodies). Each test may identify different autoantibodies; a single test makes the diagnosis possible when positive on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. However, single test positivity may be unrelated to pathogenic antibodies, which are now considered to be a subclass of abeta2GPI antibodies directed against the domain I of this protein. Conversely, all three positive tests identify a single class of abeta2GPI antibodies, thus identifying high-risk patients with APS.

Clinical course of high-risk patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The characteristics and the clinical course of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in high-risk patients that are positive for all three recommended tests that detect the presence of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies have not been described. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data examined patients referred to Italian Thrombosis Centers that were diagnosed with definite APS and tested positive for aPL [lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti-cardiolipin (aCL), and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) antibodies]. Laboratory data were confirmed in a central reference laboratory. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty patients were enrolled in this cohort study. The qualifying events at diagnosis were venous thromboembolism (76 cases; 47.5%), arterial thromboembolism (69 cases; 43.1%) and pregnancy morbidity (11 cases; 9.7%). The remaining four patients (2.5%) suffered from catastrophic APS. The cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events in the follow-up period was 12.2% (95% CI, 9.6-14.8) after 1 year, 26.1% (95% CI, 22.3-29.9) after 5 years and 44.2% (95% CI, 38.6-49.8) after 10 years. This was significantly higher in those patients not taking oral anticoagulants as compared with those on treatment (HR=2.4 95% CI 1.3-4.1; P<0.003). Major bleeding associated with oral anticoagulant therapy was low (0.8% patient/years). Ten patients died (seven were cardiovascular deaths). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with APS and triple positivity for aPL are at high risk of developing future thromboembolic events. Recurrence remains frequent despite the use of oral anticoagulants, which significantly reduces the risk of thromboembolism.