Higher preoperative range of motion is predictive of good mid-term results in the surgical management of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a prospective multicentric study.

INTRODUCTION: Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are a frequent cause of pain in young patients and a new CT arthrographic classification system of OLT was recently proposed to help guide the choices of and standardize the indications for surgical treatment. The primary hypothesis was that this algorithm would result in a postoperative AOFAS score of ≥ 80/100. The secondary hypothesis was to identify the preoperative factors of successful surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective observational multicenter study. Eighty-six patients who underwent surgery for OLT after at least 6 months of unsuccessful conservative management were included for a mean follow-up of 15 months (12-36). Forty-nine patients with stage 1 OLT underwent microperforation, 2 patients with stage 2 OLT underwent a lift, drill, fill, and fix graft procedure with screw fixation, and 35 patients with stage 3 OLT were treated with mosaicplasty. RESULTS: After a follow-up of at least 1 year, 56 patients (65%) had an AOFAS score > 80 and the mean AOFAS score was 82 (16-100). A lower BMI (p = 0.038), a higher preoperative range of motion in the ankle (p = 0.033), higher preoperative AOFAS and FAOS scores (p = 0.001 and p = 0.011), and the presence of a preoperative bone bruise on MRI (p = 0.020) were good prognostic factors on univariate analysis. The presence of grade 1 osteoarthritis on the Van Dijk classification was predictive of a poor prognosis (p = 0.044). Multivariate analysis showed that a good preoperative range of motion (OR = 1.080 [1.020-1.150] p = 0.01) was predictive of a positive outcome, while grade 1 osteoarthritis was predictive of a poor outcome (OR = 0.147 [0.036-0.603] p = 0.008). The postoperative AOFAS decreased in six patients and 17 patients had at least one complication: six dysthesias of the superficial fibular nerve, two of the sural nerve, and nine stage 1 complex regional pain syndromes. CONCLUSION: The new algorithm for OLT resulted in a postoperative AOFAS score of ≥ 80/100 in 65% of cases. The positive predictive factors of a successful postoperative outcome were the presence of a good preoperative range of motion and the absence of preoperative osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Needle arthroscopy in anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle: a report of three cases with a parallel comparison to the standard arthroscopy procedure.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the use of the needle arthroscopy in anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle. We hypothesized that the needle arthroscopy would allow anatomical reconstruction to be performed under arthroscopy. METHODS: Three patients underwent treatment of chronic ankle instability. The comparative procedure was performed in the following four steps: 1) anteromedial articular exploration (medial/lateral gutter/anterior chamber/syndesmosis); 2)creation of the talar tunnel via the anteromedial arthroscopic approach; 3) anterolateral fibular tunneling; and 4) positioning of the graft by the anteromedial arthroscopic approach. For each of these steps, the planned procedure using the needle arthroscope was compared to the standard arthroscope. For each step, the planned procedure using the needle arthroscopy was compared to the standard arthroscope and the act was classified based on level of difficulty: facilitated, similar, complicated and impossible. RESULTS: The exploration of the medial and lateral gutter, the creation of the tunnel of the talus and graft positioning were not accomplished using the needle arthroscope. While the syndesmosis visualization was facilitated by the needle arthroscope in comparison to the standard arthroscope. CONCLUSION: The anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle, using the needle arthroscopy-only approach, was impossible in all three cases, regarding: ankle joint exploration, creation of the tunnel of the talus and graft positioning. The needle arthroscope should not be considered as a "mini arthroscope" but as a new tool with which it is necessary to rethink procedures to take advantage of the benefits of this instrument.

Scapulo-humeral arthrodesis using a pedicled scapular pillar graft following resection of the proximal humerus.

BACKGROUND: Scapulo-humeral arthrodesis (SHA) is a proven reconstruction method in patients with proximal humerus malignancies requiring resection of the shoulder abduction apparatus (rotator cuff and deltoid muscles) or its nerve supply. Standard practice consists in using a pedicled fibular flap. We use instead a pedicled autologous bone graft harvested from the ipsilateral scapular pillar. HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to assess functional outcomes and radiological healing after SHA using a pedicled scapular pillar graft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of the 12 patients managed at a single center by a single surgeon between 1994 and 2011. SHA was performed using a vascularised ipsilateral scapular pillar graft after proximal humerus resection to treat a bone malignancy. The graft was harvested from the ipsilateral scapular pillar, pedicled on the circumflex scapular artery, fitted into the remaining proximal humerus, and secured to the glenoid using screws. A humerus-scapular spine plate was added to stabilize the arthrodesis. Radiographic results were assessed on standard radiographs obtained at last follow-up. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the MusculoSkeletalTumour Society (MSTS) score and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 4.9 years, 87.5% of SHA junctions were healed, mean MSTS score was 71%, and mean TESS score was 70%. DISCUSSION: The outcomes in our patients were similar to those reported after SHA using a pedicled fibular flap. However, our technique does not require microsurgery. It is simple, reproducible, and effective. Its indications of choice are intra- or extra-articular resection of the proximal humerus including the attachments of the rotator cuff and deltoid muscle tendons or the nerves supplying these muscles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV (retrospective study).