Ventilatory function in children with severe motor disorders using night-time postural equipment.

AIM: Night-time postural equipment (NTPE) can prevent hip subluxation in children with severe motor disorders (SMDs). However, it is unclear how it affects ventilatory function. The aims of the study were to determine how NTPE use affects ventilatory function and to compare night-to-night variability of ventilatory function in children with SMDs and typically developing healthy children. METHOD: Fifteen NTPE users (six males, nine females), aged 1 to 19 years (mean age 8y 7mo) alternated sleep condition between NTPE and sleeping unsupported for 14 nights. In all but two participants, gross motor function was classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level V; in the other two it was level IV. Oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpO2 ) was monitored each night and transcutaneous CO2 (PtcCO2 ) for one night in each sleep condition. In 17 healthy children of similar age, home SpO2 only was monitored for seven nights. RESULTS: In 13 of 15 NTPE users and 12 of the 17 typically developing children, SpO2 monitoring was satisfactorily completed. Of the children with SMDs, two had mean SpO2 levels below the treatment threshold for supplemental oxygen, which was uniquely associated with use of NTPE in only one participant, and three had nocturnal hypoventilation, which was uniquely associated with NTPE use in only one case. Night-to-night SpO2 variability was higher in children with SMDs than in typically developing children. INTERPRETATION: NTPE may impair or enhance ventilatory function in a minority of children. Owing to night-to-night variability in SpO2 , at least three nights of monitoring are recommended to determine optimal positioning for effective ventilation before and after NTPE introduction.

Sleep quality and respiratory function in children with severe cerebral palsy using night-time postural equipment: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Night-time postural equipment (NTPE) prevents contractures and hip subluxation in children with severe physical disabilities. However, impact on sleep quality and respiratory function has not been objectively studied. METHODS: Ten children with severe cerebral palsy (CP), mean age of 10.9 (range: 5.3-16.7) years, were recruited from a community population. Polysomnography was undertaken on two nights, once with the child sleeping in their NTPE and once sleeping unsupported. Randomization to first night condition controlled for first night effects. RESULTS: Night-time postural equipment use was associated with higher mean overnight oxygen saturation for three children but lower values for six children compared with sleeping unsupported. There were no differences in sleep quality between the conditions. The study group had lower overnight oxyhaemoglobin saturation values, less rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and higher arousal indices compared with typically developing children. CONCLUSION: This pilot study indicated that children with severe CP risk respiratory compromise in sleep irrespective of positioning. Further study will determine if the observed trend for mean overnight oxygen saturation to be lower within positioning equipment reflects random night-to-night variation or is related to equipment use. We suggest that respiratory function is assessed when determining optimal positioning for children using night-time positioning equipment.