Shortened therapy of eight weeks with paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir is highly effective in people with recent HCV genotype 1 infection.

Paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks are approved for treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. This study assessed the efficacy of shortened duration paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir with or without ribavirin for 8 weeks among people with recent HCV infection. In this open-label single-arm trial conducted in Australia, England and New Zealand, adults with recent HCV (duration of infection <12 months) received paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir (with weight-based ribavirin for genotypes 1a and 1, no subtype) for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Thirty people (median age 38 years, male 93%) commenced treatment (with ribavirin, 97%), of whom 77% (n = 23) were HIV-positive, 93% (n = 28) had genotype 1a infection and 53% (n = 16) had ever injected drugs. Median maximum ALT in the preceding 12 months was 433 IU/L (IQR 321, 1012). Acute clinical hepatitis with ALT > 10 x ULN was documented in 83% (n = 25); one participant (3%) had jaundice. At baseline, median estimated duration of infection was 30 weeks (range 11, 51), and median HCV RNA was 5.7 log10 IU/mL (range 2.7, 7.3). SVR12 was achieved in 97% (29/30; early discontinuation at week 2, n = 1; per protocol 100%, 29/29). No relapse or reinfection was observed. In conclusion, paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir (with ribavirin) for eight weeks were highly effective among HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals with recent HCV infection. These data support the use of this shortened duration direct-acting antiviral regimen in this population.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of boosted PIs in HIV-positive patients: undetectable plasma concentrations and risk of virological failure.

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiretroviral drugs is performed in selected HIV-positive patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of undetectable plasma concentrations of ritonavir and boosted PIs and to evaluate the association between those and the 48 week risk of virological failure. Methods: A TDM registry study and a retrospective follow-up study were conducted. Plasma concentrations were measured through validated methods. According to PI and ritonavir concentrations, patients were stratified as adherent, partially non-adherent or non-adherent. Virological outcome was evaluated 48 weeks afterwards. Results: The TDM registry study included 2468 samples collected from 723 patients (68.1% male, median age 43.5 years). Eighty-seven samples (3.5%, 74 patients) and 68 samples (2.8%, 52 patients) were in the partially non-adherent and non-adherent groups, respectively; more patients on atazanavir/ritonavir (7.9%) versus darunavir/ritonavir (2% twice daily and 1.9% once daily) and lopinavir/ritonavir (1.5%; P < 0.001) were observed in the partially non-adherent group. Two hundred and ninety patients were included in the follow-up study (64.1% male, median age 40 years). Patients in the adherent group had a higher chance of viral control [81.9% (167/204)] versus the partially non-adherent group and the non-adherent group [71.7% (33/46) and 53.1% (17/32), respectively; P  =   0.001]. Based on multivariate analysis, baseline HIV RNA >50 copies/mL ( P < 0.001), genotypic susceptibility score ≤2 ( P = 0.001), lower nadir CD4 cell count ( P = 0.003) and not being in the adherent group ( P = 0.029) were independent predictors of HIV RNA >50 copies/mL at 48 weeks. Conclusions: The measurement of PI and ritonavir plasma levels can uncover incomplete compliance with treatment; TDM may represent a useful tool for identifying patients in need of adherence-promoting interventions.

Previous bloodstream infections due to other pathogens as predictors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in colonized patients: results from a retrospective multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: the purpose of this retrospective multicenter study was to assess whether the risk of developing bloodstream infections (BSI) due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) in colonized patients is influenced by the occurrence of BSI due to other pathogens. METHODS: from January 2012 to March 2014, all patients with at least one rectal swab positive for CRKP and at least 30 days of previous hospital stay were included in the study. The primary outcome measure was CRKP BSI, defined as a time-to-event endpoint. The role of potential predictors was evaluated through univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses, considering previous BSI as a time-dependent variable. RESULTS: during the study period, 353 patients met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-seven developed a CRKP BSI (11%). A higher incidence of CRKP BSI was observed in presence rather than in absence of previous BSI. In the final multivariable model of risk factors for CRKP BSI, multisite colonization (hazard ratio [HR] 13.73, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 3.29-57.32, p < 0.001), ICU stay (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.19-8.31, p = 0.021), and previous BSI (p = 0.026, with the overall effect being mainly due to Enterococcus spp. BSI vs absence of BSI, HR 6.62, 95% CI 2.11-20.79) were associated with the development of CRKP BSI, while an inverse association was observed for age (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: previous BSI due to other pathogens were associated with an increased risk of CRKP BSI that was independent of other factors in colonized patients with prolonged hospital exposure.

Risk factors for bloodstream infections due to colistin-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: results from a multicenter case-control-control study.

The increasing prevalence of colistin resistance (ColR) Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (Kp) is a matter of concern because of its unfavourable impact on mortality of KPC-Kp bloodstream infections (BSI) and the shortage of alternative therapeutic options. A matched case-control-control analysis was conducted. The primary study end point was to assess risk factors for ColR KPC-Kp BSI. The secondary end point was to describe mortality and clinical characteristics of these infections. To assess risk factors for ColR, 142 patients with ColR KPC-Kp BSI were compared to two controls groups: 284 controls without infections caused by KPC-Kp (control group A) and 284 controls with colistin-susceptible (ColS) KPC-Kp BSI (control group B). In the first multivariate analysis (cases vs. group A), previous colistin therapy, previous KPC-Kp colonization, ≥3 previous hospitalizations, Charlson score ≥3 and neutropenia were found to be associated with the development of ColR KPC-Kp BSI. In the second multivariate analysis (cases vs. group B), only previous colistin therapy, previous KPC-Kp colonization and Charlson score ≥3 were associated with ColR. Overall, ColR among KPC-Kp blood isolates increased more than threefold during the 4.5-year study period, and 30-day mortality of ColR KPC-Kp BSI was as high as 51%. Strict rules for the use of colistin are mandatory to staunch the dissemination of ColR in KPC-Kp-endemic hospitals.

The effect of inappropriate therapy on bacteremia by ESBL-producing bacteria.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of empiric appropriate treatment and the risk factors associated with mortality in patients with bacteremia by E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis producing ESBL. METHODS: Data were reviewed in an 8-year retrospective study, and 128 bacteremias were found: 80 caused by E. coli (62.5%), 28 by K. pneumoniae (21.9%) and 20 by P. mirabilis (18.6%). RESULTS: The initial antibiotic treatment, administered within 72 h after the first positive blood culture, was appropriate with carbapenems or other antimicrobial agents with documented in vitro sensitivity in 53.8 and 16% of patients, respectively. The overall mortality 21 days after diagnosis was 17.2%, and it was 14.9 and 35.2% for patients adequately and inadequately treated, respectively. At univariate analysis the p value for mortality with and without appropriate treatment was 0.05, and significant differences were found only for previous positive blood cultures (p = 0.004) and presence of septic shock at diagnosis (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: In this case series there was a high rate of initial appropriate empiric treatment, and only a marginal impact on mortality was found with regard to appropriate and inappropriate treatment. This report shows that the knowledge of ESBL-producing characteristics varies widely among the different case series for reasons that still have to be clarified.