Coronally advanced flap procedure: is the interdental papilla a prognostic factor for root coverage?

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to verify if the dimension of the interdental papilla may be a prognostic factor for the clinical outcome of the coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of gingival recessions. METHODS: Thirty-three Miller Class I recessions were treated in 33 patients using the CAF procedure. Two types of measurements were performed: 1) clinical measurements (probing depth, recession depth, width of keratinized tissue, clinical attachment level) were recorded at baseline and 3 months after surgery and 2) all recessions were photographed and transformed into computer images. A specific software allowed recording of both linear and square measurements. The following digital measurements were recorded at baseline: 1) base, height, and area of the mesial and distal papillae adjacent to the involved tooth and 2) width/depth of the recession and the area of the exposed root surface of the involved tooth. The residual recession area, if any, was recorded 3 months after surgery. The digital measurements of the height and of the area of the papilla were used in statistical analysis (multiple linear regression and logistic regression) to evaluate a possible correlation with root coverage (mm2) and/or with complete root coverage. RESULTS: Root coverage was not significantly correlated to the papilla area (P= 0.3692) or to papilla height (P= 0.0968). The complete root coverage was not correlated to the papilla area (P= 0.3181), but it was correlated to papilla height (P= 0.0499). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the root coverage following CAF procedure is not significantly correlated to papilla dimension. However, complete root coverage is significantly more frequent in sites with lower height of the adjacent papilla.

Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Flap with tension versus flap without tension: a randomized controlled clinical study.

BACKGROUND: This clinical controlled study was designed to measure the tension of coronally advanced flaps (CAF) performed to treat shallow gingival recessions and to compare the recession reduction (Rec Red) achieved in a test group (flaps with tension) and in a control group (flaps without tension) 3 months after surgery. METHODS: Eleven patients, aged 22 to 41 years, with high levels of oral hygiene (full mouth plaque score <20%) were selected for the study. Each patient showed 2 bilateral Miller Class I maxillary or mandibular gingival recessions located on homologous teeth. A total of 22 recessions were treated. The recession depth at the right site was similar to that at the left site (difference < or =1 mm). For each patient, the 2 recessions underwent CAF procedure in the same surgical session. Before suturing, the residual tension (FTens) of both right and left flaps was measured with a dynamometer. Then, one site was randomly assigned to the test group and the contralateral site to the control group. In the test site the flap was sutured. In the control site the flap was further relaxed, the tension was measured again, and the flap was sutured. RESULTS: In the test group (with tension) the initial mean recession depth was 2.82 +/- 0.64 mm and mean FTens was 6.5 g, while in the control group (without tension) the initial mean recession depth was 2.68 +/- 0.81 mm and mean FTens was 0.4 g. Three months later, the test group showed a mean recession reduction of 2.18 +/- 0.60 mm, a mean percent root coverage of 78 +/- 15%, and complete root coverage was achieved on 2 teeth (18%). In the control group the mean recession reduction was 2.32 +/- 0.81 mm and mean percent root coverage was 87 +/- 13%. Complete root coverage was obtained on 5 teeth (45%). The difference of recession reduction between the test and control group was not statistically significant (P = 0.3911). In the test group, linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant association between recession reduction and both recession depth at baseline (P= 0.0001) and mean of the 3 tensions recorded on the test side (MFTens) (P = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that minimal flap tension does not influence recession reduction after 3 months when shallow recessions are treated by means of CAF. In the test group (with tension), the statistical analysis suggests that the higher the flap tension, the lower the recession reduction.

Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Is flap thickness a relevant predictor to achieve root coverage? A 19-case series.

This clinical study was designed to determine whether the thickness of the flap can influence root coverage when gingival recessions associated with traumatic toothbrushing are treated using a coronally advanced flap (CAF). Nineteen patients, aged from 25 to 57 years, with high levels of oral hygiene (full-mouth plaque scores <20%) were selected for the study. Each patient contributed with one Miller Class I or II maxillary or mandibular recession. A total of 19 recessions > or =2 mm were treated. After local anesthesia and before flap elevation, the exposed root surface was planed with a sharp curet. A trapezoidal full- and partial-thickness flap was then elevated, displaced coronally, and sutured to cover the treated root surface. Before suturing, flap thickness was measured in the alveolar mucosa with a gauge. After surgery, all patients were recalled for control and professional prophylaxis once a week during the first month and monthly up to the third month. The mean initial recession depth was 3.0+/-0.9 mm. Mean flap thickness (FT) was 0.7+/-0.2 mm. Three months later, mean recession depth was 0.6+/-0.6 (P <0.0001) and mean recession reduction was 2.4+/-0.7 mm. Mean root coverage was 82+/-17%. Flap thickness >0.8 mm was associated with 100% of root coverage. The results of this study indicate that there is a direct relation between flap thickness and recession reduction (P <0.0001).

Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Treatment of root surface: root planning versus polishing.

This clinical study was designed to determine if mechanical instrumentation (root planing) of the exposed root is useful in treating gingival recession caused by traumatic toothbrushing following a coronally advanced flap (CAF). Ten patients with high levels of oral hygiene (full-mouth plaque score <20%), from 25 to 57 years of age, were selected for the study. Each patient showed 2 bilateral Class I or II maxillary recessions. A total of 20 recessions were treated. The difference in the recessions was < or =1 mm. In each patient, one recession was randomly assigned to the test group and the contralateral one to the control group. In the test group, the exposed root surface was polished at slow speed with a rubber cup and prophylaxis paste for 60 seconds. In the control group, the exposed root surface was planed with a sharp curet. In both test and control groups, a trapezoidal full- and partial-thickness flap was elevated, coronally displaced, and sutured to cover the treated root surface. Before treatment, the mean recession depth in the test group (polishing) was 3.1+/-1.1 mm; and in the control group (root planing), 2.9+/-1.0 mm. Three months after the described procedures, the test group (polishing) showed a mean recession reduction of 2.6+/-0.6 mm; mean percent root coverage was 89+/-14%. In the control group (root planing), the mean recession reduction was 2.3+/-0.7 mm and mean percent root coverage was 83+/-16%. The difference of recession reduction between the test and control group was not statistically significant (P = 0.1405), even though the test group showed slightly better clinical results in terms of root coverage. This prospective clinical, controlled, randomized study shows that mechanical instrumentation (root planing) of the exposed root surfaces is not necessary when shallow recessions caused by traumatic toothbrushing are treated using a coronally advanced flap (CAF) in patients with high levels of oral hygiene.

Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal recessions. A 4-year follow-up study.

The 4-year follow-up results of a clinical trial are reported. The clinical results of the treatment of buccal recession were analyzed comparing the outcomes of a guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedure with nonresorbable membranes and a 2-step mucogingival procedure consisting of a coronally-positioned free gingival graft in two groups of 25 patients each. The final root coverage was 73.07% in the test group (GTR) and 72.3% in the control group (mucogingival surgery). In the test group, statistically significant recession reduction, probing depth reduction, clinical attachment level gain, and increase of keratinized tissue width were observed. In the control group the results were similar except for probing depth, which did not vary significantly. At the end of the 4-year follow-up period, the average periodontal conditions did not differ between the 2 groups, with the exception of the keratinized tissue width. This was obviously greater in the control group, where a free gingival graft had been carried out. Recessions > or = 5 mm had a greater root coverage after GTR treatment. In both groups, the periodontal parameters remained stable between 18 months and 4 years after surgery, indicating remarkable stability; the only exception was a significant increase in the keratinized tissue width in the test group. When the changes between the baseline and the 4-year follow-up were compared, the average reduction in the recession was similar in the two groups while probing depth reduction and clinical attachment level were greater in the GTR group.