Nascent DNA sequencing and its diverse applications in genome integrity research.

Multiple DNA repair pathways and biological responses to DNA damage have evolved to protect cells from various types of lesions to which they are subjected. Although DNA repair systems are mechanistically distinct, all process the damaged region and then insert new bases to fill the gap. In 1969, Robert Painter developed an assay called "unscheduled" DNA synthesis (UDS), which measures DNA repair synthesis as the uptake of radiolabeled DNA precursors distinct from replicative synthesis. Contemporary detection of nascent DNA during repair by next-generation sequencing grants genome-wide information about the nature of lesions that threaten genome integrity. Recently, we developed the SAR-seq (synthesis associated with repair sequencing) method, which provides a high-resolution view of UDS. SAR-seq has been utilized to map programmed DNA repair sites in non-dividing neurons, replication initiation zones, monitor 53BP1 function in countering end-resection, and to identify regions of the genome that fail to complete replication during S phase but utilize repair synthesis during mitosis (MiDAS). As an example of SAR-seq, we present data showing that sites replicated during mitosis correspond to common fragile sites, which have been linked to tumor progression, cellular senescence, and aging.

DNA-PK promotes DNA end resection at DNA double strand breaks in G0 cells.

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination is confined to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle partly due to 53BP1 antagonizing DNA end resection in G1 phase and non-cycling quiescent (G0) cells where DSBs are predominately repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Unexpectedly, we uncovered extensive MRE11- and CtIP-dependent DNA end resection at DSBs in G0 murine and human cells. A whole genome CRISPR/Cas9 screen revealed the DNA-dependent kinase (DNA-PK) complex as a key factor in promoting DNA end resection in G0 cells. In agreement, depletion of FBXL12, which promotes ubiquitylation and removal of the KU70/KU80 subunits of DNA-PK from DSBs, promotes even more extensive resection in G0 cells. In contrast, a requirement for DNA-PK in promoting DNA end resection in proliferating cells at the G1 or G2 phase of the cell cycle was not observed. Our findings establish that DNA-PK uniquely promotes DNA end resection in G0, but not in G1 or G2 phase cells, which has important implications for DNA DSB repair in quiescent cells.

Role of 53BP1 in end protection and DNA synthesis at DNA breaks.

Double-strand break (DSB) repair choice is greatly influenced by the initial processing of DNA ends. 53BP1 limits the formation of recombinogenic single-strand DNA (ssDNA) in BRCA1-deficient cells, leading to defects in homologous recombination (HR). However, the exact mechanisms by which 53BP1 inhibits DSB resection remain unclear. Previous studies have identified two potential pathways: protection against DNA2/EXO1 exonucleases presumably through the Shieldin (SHLD) complex binding to ssDNA, and localized DNA synthesis through the CTC1-STN1-TEN1 (CST) and DNA polymerase α (Polα) to counteract resection. Using a combinatorial approach of END-seq, SAR-seq, and RPA ChIP-seq, we directly assessed the extent of resection, DNA synthesis, and ssDNA, respectively, at restriction enzyme-induced DSBs. We show that, in the presence of 53BP1, Polα-dependent DNA synthesis reduces the fraction of resected DSBs and the resection lengths in G0/G1, supporting a previous model that fill-in synthesis can limit the extent of resection. However, in the absence of 53BP1, Polα activity is sustained on ssDNA yet does not substantially counter resection. In contrast, EXO1 nuclease activity is essential for hyperresection in the absence of 53BP1. Thus, Polα-mediated fill-in partially limits resection in the presence of 53BP1 but cannot counter extensive hyperresection due to the loss of 53BP1 exonuclease blockade. These data provide the first nucleotide mapping of DNA synthesis at resected DSBs and provide insight into the relationship between fill-in polymerases and resection exonucleases.

Two mechanisms of chromosome fragility at replication-termination sites in bacteria.

Chromosomal fragile sites are implicated in promoting genome instability, which drives cancers and neurological diseases. Yet, the causes and mechanisms of chromosome fragility remain speculative. Here, we identify three spontaneous fragile sites in the Escherichia coli genome and define their DNA damage and repair intermediates at high resolution. We find that all three sites, all in the region of replication termination, display recurrent four-way DNA or Holliday junctions (HJs) and recurrent DNA breaks. Homology-directed double-strand break repair generates the recurrent HJs at all of these sites; however, distinct mechanisms of DNA breakage are implicated: replication fork collapse at natural replication barriers and, unexpectedly, frequent shearing of unsegregated sister chromosomes at cell division. We propose that mechanisms such as both of these may occur ubiquitously, including in humans, and may constitute some of the earliest events that underlie somatic cell mosaicism, cancers, and other diseases of genome instability.

Neuronal enhancers are hotspots for DNA single-strand break repair.

Defects in DNA repair frequently lead to neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases, underscoring the particular importance of DNA repair in long-lived post-mitotic neurons1,2. The cellular genome is subjected to a constant barrage of endogenous DNA damage, but surprisingly little is known about the identity of the lesion(s) that accumulate in neurons and whether they accrue throughout the genome or at specific loci. Here we show that post-mitotic neurons accumulate unexpectedly high levels of DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) at specific sites within the genome. Genome-wide mapping reveals that SSBs are located within enhancers at or near CpG dinucleotides and sites of DNA demethylation. These SSBs are repaired by PARP1 and XRCC1-dependent mechanisms. Notably, deficiencies in XRCC1-dependent short-patch repair increase DNA repair synthesis at neuronal enhancers, whereas defects in long-patch repair reduce synthesis. The high levels of SSB repair in neuronal enhancers are therefore likely to be sustained by both short-patch and long-patch processes. These data provide the first evidence of site- and cell-type-specific SSB repair, revealing unexpected levels of localized and continuous DNA breakage in neurons. In addition, they suggest an explanation for the neurodegenerative phenotypes that occur in patients with defective SSB repair.

Dual histone methyl reader ZCWPW1 facilitates repair of meiotic double strand breaks in male mice.

Meiotic crossovers result from homology-directed repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Unlike yeast and plants, where DSBs are generated near gene promoters, in many vertebrates DSBs are enriched at hotspots determined by the DNA binding activity of the rapidly evolving zinc finger array of PRDM9 (PR domain zinc finger protein 9). PRDM9 subsequently catalyzes tri-methylation of lysine 4 and lysine 36 of Histone H3 in nearby nucleosomes. Here, we identify the dual histone methylation reader ZCWPW1, which is tightly co-expressed during spermatogenesis with Prdm9, as an essential meiotic recombination factor required for efficient repair of PRDM9-dependent DSBs and for pairing of homologous chromosomes in male mice. In sum, our results indicate that the evolution of a dual histone methylation writer/reader (PRDM9/ZCWPW1) system in vertebrates remodeled genetic recombination hotspot selection from an ancestral static pattern near genes towards a flexible pattern controlled by the rapidly evolving DNA binding activity of PRDM9.

ATM and PRDM9 regulate SPO11-bound recombination intermediates during meiosis.

Meiotic recombination is initiated by SPO11-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs). In most mammals, the methyltransferase PRDM9 guides SPO11 targeting, and the ATM kinase controls meiotic DSB numbers. Following MRE11 nuclease removal of SPO11, the DSB is resected and loaded with DMC1 filaments for homolog invasion. Here, we demonstrate the direct detection of meiotic DSBs and resection using END-seq on mouse spermatocytes with low sample input. We find that DMC1 limits both minimum and maximum resection lengths, whereas 53BP1, BRCA1 and EXO1 play surprisingly minimal roles. Through enzymatic modifications to END-seq, we identify a SPO11-bound meiotic recombination intermediate (SPO11-RI) present at all hotspots. We propose that SPO11-RI forms because chromatin-bound PRDM9 asymmetrically blocks MRE11 from releasing SPO11. In Atm-/- spermatocytes, trapped SPO11 cleavage complexes accumulate due to defective MRE11 initiation of resection. Thus, in addition to governing SPO11 breakage, ATM and PRDM9 are critical local regulators of mammalian SPO11 processing.

Follicular B2 Cell Activation and Class Switch Recombination Depend on Autocrine C3ar1/C5ar1 Signaling in B2 Cells.

The involvement of complement in B2 cell responses has been regarded as occurring strictly via complement components in plasma. In this study, we show that Ab production and class switch recombination (CSR) depend on autocrine C3a and C5a receptor (C3ar1/C5ar1) signaling in B2 cells. CD40 upregulation, IL-6 production, growth in response to BAFF or APRIL, and AID/Bcl-6 expression, as well as follicular CD4+ cell CD21 production, all depended on this signal transduction. OVA immunization of C3ar1-/-C5ar1-/- mice elicited IgM Ab but no other isotypes, whereas decay accelerating factor (Daf1)-/- mice elicited more robust Ab production and CSR than wild-type (WT) mice. Comparable differences occurred in OVA-immunized µMT recipients of WT, C3ar1-/-C5ar1-/- , and Daf1-/- B2 cells and in hen egg lysozyme-immunized µMT recipients of MD4 B2 cells on each genetic background. B2 cells produced factor I and C3 and autophosphorylated CD19. Immunized C3-/-C5-/- recipients of WT MD4 bone marrow efficiently produced Ab. Thus, B2 cell-produced complement participates in B2 cell activation.

Enhancing our understanding of enhancers in T-helper cells.

A long-standing question in immunology has been to understand how transcription factors (TF) determine cell-type-specific transcription programs. Traditionally, investigating TFs in immune cells has been limited to measuring the effect of a single TF on a limited number of gene targets. The advent of next generation sequencing methods makes it possible to measure the effects of multiple transcription factors on a genome-wide scale. This holistic approach gives us a better understanding of the influence that multiple TFs have on cell-specific programs. In this issue of European Journal of Immunology, Fang et al. [Eur. J. Immunol. 2015. 45: 3150-3157] show that genomic regions cooccupied with two or more TFs show increased epigenetic histone marks of active enhancers, which correspond to increased transcriptional activity.